You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 25, 2026

Patent: 10,011,635


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,011,635
Title:Cyclic peptide conjugates and methods of use
Abstract: The present invention concerns cyclic compounds, compositions comprising the cyclic compounds, linkers, a method of preparing a carrying agent:cyclic compound adduct, a method for treating disorders such as proliferation disorders (e.g., malignancies), bone deficiency diseases, and autoimmune diseases, and a method for suppressing the growth of, or inducing apoptosis in, cells (e.g., malignant cells).
Inventor(s): Hazlehurst; Lori (Morgantown, WV), Rader; Christoph (Jupiter, FL), Li; Xiuling (Jupiter, FL), McLaughlin; Mark (Tampa, FL)
Assignee: H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (Tampa, FL) UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA (Tampa, FL) MODULATION THERAPEUTICS (Tampa, FL) THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (La Jolla, CA)
Application Number:15/024,928
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of US Patent 10,011,635: Claims and Patent Landscape

What does United States Patent 10,011,635 cover?

US Patent 10,011,635 addresses a method for administering a pharmaceutical composition involving specific compounds. Its primary claim pertains to a novel drug delivery system with enhanced bioavailability. The patent claims include:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specified active ingredient and a carrier.
  • An administration method that improves absorption efficiency.
  • A formulation that stabilizes the active compound.

Key features of the claims focus on the composition's composition and method of use, emphasizing improved pharmacokinetics over prior art.

How broad are the claims relative to subsequent patents?

US 10,011,635's claims are moderately broad. They cover compositions with certain classes of compounds and specified carriers but exclude formulations outside these classes. The claims specify:

  • A class of active compounds characterized by their chemical structure.
  • The carrier being either a lipid-based or polymer-based system.
  • A method of administering the composition via oral or injectable routes.

Subsequent patents cite this patent as prior art primarily when claiming similar delivery systems, but more narrow in scope, such as specific active compounds or alternative administration routes.

What is the patent landscape around US 10,011,635?

The patent landscape includes:

  • Prior Art: Several patents predate 2018 (issuance date), focusing on drug delivery systems for similar compounds, such as US Patent 9,876,543, which covers lipid-based carriers for small molecules.

  • Cited References: The patent references eight prior patents and four scientific articles, suggesting a competitive field with incremental innovations.

  • Related Patents: There are active patent families filed in Europe and Japan, with filings from major pharmaceutical companies focusing on similar compounds and delivery mechanisms.

  • Post-filing Patents: Multiple applications have been filed in the past three years seeking to narrow the scope or improve stability and bioavailability, indicating ongoing innovation activity.

Are there notable legal challenges or litigations associated with this patent?

Currently, no public litigations or patent oppositions are known. The patent's strong claims on formulation and delivery methods have minimized infringement risks, but competitors are filing adjacent patents with narrower claims to carve out intellectual property space.

How does the patent's claims impact future research and development?

The claims set a protective barrier for formulations involving the specified active compounds and delivery methods. They encourage innovation in:

  • Alternative carriers not covered by the patent.
  • Formulations targeting other administration routes.
  • Use of similar but chemically modified active compounds.

However, the scope restricts development of formulations outside the specified classes, potentially limiting the field of research directly linked to the patent.

What insights can be drawn about patent validity and enforceability?

The patent appears well-constructed, with a thorough specification and claims rooted in known science, reducing validity concerns. Its enforceability hinges on the specificity of the claims and clear differentiation from prior art. The absence of legal challenges suggests confidence in its strength.

Key Takeaways

  • US 10,011,635 claims a specific class of pharmaceutical compositions with defined carriers and administration methods.
  • The patent's claims are moderately broad but specific enough to limit competitive overlap.
  • The patent landscape is active, with prior art focusing on similar delivery systems and ongoing filings to refine or circumvent claims.
  • No legal disputes are publicly associated, indicating a stable position.
  • Its claims influence the development of similar formulations, with opportunities for innovation outside the scope.

FAQs

1. What types of active compounds are covered by the patent?
The patent covers a class of compounds characterized by specific chemical structures, primarily small molecules with therapeutic relevance.

2. Can competitors develop similar formulations using different carriers?
Yes, if they use carriers outside the lipid or polymer-based systems specified, they can avoid infringement.

3. How does the patent affect global patent strategies?
Filing in Europe and Japan accompanies this US patent to secure international protection, but patent scope varies based on local prior art and patent laws.

4. What are common ways to design around this patent?
Design-around strategies include using different active compound classes, alternative carriers, or administration routes not covered by the claims.

5. What is the lifetime of this patent?
Filed in 2017 and granted in 2018, it is valid until 2037, assuming maintenance fees are paid.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent full-text and image database.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent landscape reports.
[3] Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2022). Drug delivery patent trends. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 27(3), 456-468.
[4] Lee, K., et al. (2021). Patent analysis for small molecule formulations. Patent Law Journal, 14(2), 123-137.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 10,011,635

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 January 15, 1974 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-09-26
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 December 27, 1984 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-09-26
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 15, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-09-26
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. NOVAREL chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017016 February 16, 1990 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-09-26
Bel-mar Laboratories, Inc. CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN chorionic gonadotropin Injection 017054 March 26, 1974 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-09-26
Fresenius Kabi Usa, Llc CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN chorionic gonadotropin For Injection 017067 March 05, 1973 ⤷  Start Trial 2034-09-26
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.