You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Isatuximab-irfc - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for isatuximab-irfc
Tradenames:1
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:1
BLAs:1
Suppliers: see list1
Pharmacology for isatuximab-irfc
Mechanism of ActionCD38-directed Antibody Interactions
Established Pharmacologic ClassCD38-directed Cytolytic Antibody
Chemical StructureAntibodies, Monoclonal
Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for isatuximab-irfc Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for isatuximab-irfc Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

No patents found based on company disclosures

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for isatuximab-irfc Derived from Patent Text Search

No patents found based on company disclosures

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Biologic Drug: Isatuximab-irfc

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Isatuximab-irfc (sold under the brand name Sarclisa) represents a significant advancement in the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma, a challenging hematologic malignancy characterized by high unmet medical needs. As a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, isatuximab-irfc exemplifies the growing importance of biologics in oncology. This analysis explores the current market dynamics and projective financial trajectory of isatuximab-irfc, factoring in the competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and evolving treatment paradigms.


Market Overview and Therapeutic Context

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable, with over 34,000 new cases annually in the United States alone (American Cancer Society). Despite multiple therapeutic options—immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors, and corticosteroids—the disease relapse rate remains high, underscoring the necessity for novel agents. Monoclonal antibodies, including daratumumab and elotuzumab, have reshaped first-line and relapsed/refractory settings, paving the way for isatuximab-irfc.

Isatuximab-irfc’s mechanism of action centers on targeting CD38, an antigen overexpressed on malignant plasma cells. It induces cell death via immune-mediated cytotoxicity, including antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC).


Market Dynamics

1. Competitive Landscape

Isatuximab-irfc operates amid a crowded market dominated by daratumumab (Darzalex), which has secured widespread approval since 2015 for various MM settings. Daratumumab's established efficacy and broad label coverage create substantial barriers for isatuximab-irfc. However, key differentiating factors, including dosing schedules, side effect profiles, and combination potentials, influence market penetration.

Eliquis’ positioning within the multiple myeloma space is reinforced by its unique clinical profile. For instance, the ELOQUENT-2 and CANDOR trials demonstrated effective synergy when combined with immunomodulatory agents and proteasome inhibitors, respectively. Isatuximab-irfc benefits from co-development with partner companies—most notably Sanofi—which supports marketing and distribution.

2. Regulatory Environment

The FDA approved isatuximab-irfc in March 2020 for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) following at least two prior therapies. Similarly, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted conditional approval, facilitating early market entry. Ongoing clinical trials aim to expand indications to frontline settings and maintenance therapy, which could significantly expand the commercial footprint.

3. Market Penetration and Adoption

Adoption rates are impacted by physicians’ familiarity with existing CD38 antibodies. Real-world data suggest a gradual but steady uptake driven by positive trial outcomes and combination therapy approvals. The drug’s positioning in combination regimens with pomalidomide, dexamethasone, or cartilaginous agents acts as a growth catalyst.

4. Pricing and Reimbursement

Pricing strategies for biologics like isatuximab-irfc often reflect the value delivered via extended survival and quality-of-life improvements. In the U.S., the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) is approximately $14,000 per infusion, aligning with other monoclonal antibodies. Reimbursement negotiations, driven by health technology assessments (HTAs), have calibrated access across different markets.

5. Market Challenges and Opportunities

Major challenges include competition from daratumumab and emerging bispecific T-cell engagers, which are being evaluated in early-phase trials. Nonetheless, opportunities lie in combination strategies, expanding indications, and potential biosimilar entries once patents expire—though current patent protections extend into the mid-2030s.


Financial Trajectory Analysis

1. Revenue Projections

In its initial years, isatuximab-irfc demonstrated modest revenue, dominated by sales in RRMM. An analysis of Sanofi's financial disclosures indicates the drug generated approximately $250 million in 2022, reflecting early adoption. For subsequent years, estimates project a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20-25% over the next five years, driven by:

  • Expanded indications in frontline and maintenance settings.
  • Increased combination regimen approvals.
  • Expansion into new geographies beyond the U.S. and Europe.

Forecasted revenue for 2025 could approach $600–$800 million, contingent on successful market penetration and competitive positioning.

2. Cost Structure and Profit Margins

Biologic drugs like isatuximab-irfc entail high manufacturing costs, primarily due to complex cell culture processes. However, as production scales, economies of scale should improve margins. Gross margins are estimated at 60-70%, consistent with comparable monoclonal antibodies. Marketing, regulatory, and distribution expenses form significant components of operating costs.

3. R&D and Pipeline Investments

Ongoing clinical trials, including phase 3 studies in newly diagnosed MM, suggest continued R&D spending to broaden the label and improve clinical outcomes. Investment in pipeline expansion remains pivotal, with anticipated capital expenditure ranging from $50-$100 million annually.

4. Long-term Financial Outlook

If isatuximab-irfc sustains its growth trajectory, incorporating positive trial outcomes and market expansion, Sanofi could see cumulative revenues exceeding $3 billion globally by 2030. Export growth, especially in Asia-Pacific markets, presents additional upside.


Market Risks and Mitigation

  • Intense Competition: Emergence of new agents, including bispecific antibodies (e.g., teclistamab) and CAR-T therapies, may erode market share.
  • Regulatory Delays: Potential delays in expanding indications or novel combination approvals could impact revenue streams.
  • Pricing Pressure: Reimbursement constraints and biosimilar entries could compress profit margins.
  • Clinical Uncertainty: Long-term efficacy and safety data remain essential for sustained adoption.

Mitigation strategies encompass continual clinical trial investment, broadening indications, and fostering strategic collaborations with payers and healthcare providers.


Key Market Drivers

  • Demonstrated clinical efficacy in vulnerable patient populations.
  • Compatibility with existing multiple myeloma treatment protocols.
  • Growing prevalence of multiple myeloma.
  • Favorable regulatory reviews and approvals.
  • Successful global market expansion.

Key Market Restraints

  • Dominance of daratumumab and its entrenched market position.
  • Competitive development of bispecific T-cell engagers.
  • Cost considerations influencing healthcare payers.
  • Clinical trial results influencing clinician preferences.

Conclusion

Isatuximab-irfc stands as an integral player within the evolving landscape of multiple myeloma therapy. Its market dynamics hinge on clinical performance, strategic positioning, and regulatory support, with an expected steady financial trajectory. While competition and emerging therapies present notable challenges, ongoing expansion into earlier lines of therapy and international markets constitute promising growth vectors. Stakeholders should closely monitor clinical developments, reimbursement policies, and competitive innovations to optimize investment and strategic deployment.


Key Takeaways

  • Isatuximab-irfc is poised for sustained growth through expanded indications and combination therapies.
  • Competition from entrenched therapies like daratumumab necessitates strategic differentiation.
  • Revenue could approach $800 million by 2025, with long-term projections exceeding $3 billion globally.
  • Clinical trial outcomes and regulatory decisions are pivotal to future market penetration.
  • Cost management and keen payer negotiations will be critical to maintaining healthy profit margins.

FAQs

1. How does isatuximab-irfc differ from other CD38 monoclonal antibodies?
Isatuximab-irfc shares a similar mechanism with daratumumab but features distinct binding epitopes and administration schedules. Clinical trials suggest potential differences in side effect profiles and efficacy in certain subgroups.

2. What are the primary clinical benefits of isatuximab-irfc in multiple myeloma?
It improves overall response rates when combined with standard regimens, offering durable remissions, particularly in relapsed/refractory populations.

3. What is the current regulatory status of isatuximab-irfc?
It has received FDA approval for relapsed/refractory MM and similar approvals in Europe, with ongoing trials for additional indications.

4. What future market opportunities exist for isatuximab-irfc?
Expansions into frontline therapy, maintenance settings, and combination with novel agents, plus broader international approval, constitute key opportunities.

5. How might biosimilars impact isatuximab-irfc’s market?
Patent expirations could lead to biosimilar competition, potentially reducing prices but occurring beyond the mid-2030s, allowing current market growth to continue in the interim.


Sources

[1] American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures (2022)
[2] Sanofi Annual Report 2022
[3] FDA Drug Approvals Database (2020–2023)
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov entries on isatuximab-irfc phase 3 trials
[5] Market research reports on multiple myeloma biologics

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.