You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Coagulation factor ix (recombinant) - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for coagulation factor ix (recombinant)
Tradenames:3
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:6
BLAs:6
Suppliers: see list6
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for coagulation factor ix (recombinant)
Recent Clinical Trials for coagulation factor ix (recombinant)

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
Evergreen Therapeutics, Inc.PHASE1
National Institutes of Health (NIH)PHASE1
Brigham and Women's HospitalPHASE1

See all coagulation factor ix (recombinant) clinical trials

Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for coagulation factor ix (recombinant) Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for coagulation factor ix (recombinant) Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. RIXUBIS coagulation factor ix (recombinant) For Injection 125446 ⤷  Start Trial 2035-11-17 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. RIXUBIS coagulation factor ix (recombinant) For Injection 125446 ⤷  Start Trial 2039-02-08 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. RIXUBIS coagulation factor ix (recombinant) For Injection 125446 ⤷  Start Trial 2038-11-07 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. RIXUBIS coagulation factor ix (recombinant) For Injection 125446 ⤷  Start Trial 2020-09-14 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. RIXUBIS coagulation factor ix (recombinant) For Injection 125446 ⤷  Start Trial 2030-08-02 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.s.a., Inc. RIXUBIS coagulation factor ix (recombinant) For Injection 125446 ⤷  Start Trial 2036-05-24 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for coagulation factor ix (recombinant) Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Coagulation Factor IX (Recombinant): Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This analysis examines the market dynamics and financial trajectory for recombinant coagulation factor IX (rFIX) drugs. The market is driven by the demand for hemophilia B treatment, influenced by patent expirations, generic competition, and the introduction of novel delivery technologies. Key players are focused on extending product lifecycles through intellectual property strategies and exploring biosimilar development.

What is Recombinant Coagulation Factor IX?

Recombinant coagulation factor IX (rFIX) is a therapeutic protein produced through recombinant DNA technology. It replaces or supplements the deficient or non-functional clotting factor IX in individuals with hemophilia B. Hemophilia B is a rare genetic bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency in this specific clotting factor.

Mechanisms of Action

rFIX functions identically to endogenous coagulation factor IX. In the clotting cascade, factor IX, upon activation, forms a complex with activated factor VIII on the surface of activated platelets. This complex cleaves and activates factor X, a critical step in generating thrombin, which ultimately leads to fibrin clot formation and hemostasis. By providing a functional rFIX protein, these therapeutics enable proper blood clotting and reduce the incidence of spontaneous and trauma-induced bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia B.

Therapeutic Indications

The primary indication for rFIX is the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia B. This includes:

  • Treatment of bleeding episodes: Administered intravenously to stop active bleeding.
  • Prophylactic treatment: Regular infusions to prevent bleeding events, particularly in severe hemophilia B.
  • Perioperative management: Used to control bleeding during and after surgical procedures.

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global market for recombinant coagulation factor IX is projected for steady growth, fueled by increasing diagnoses, improved access to treatment, and advancements in drug delivery.

Current Market Valuation

The global hemophilia market, which rFIX drugs are a significant part of, was valued at approximately $12.5 billion in 2022. Within this, rFIX specific market segment is estimated to be between $1.5 billion and $2 billion annually. Growth is projected to reach approximately $18 billion by 2028, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 6-7%.

Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing Incidence and Diagnosis: A rise in hemophilia B diagnoses, particularly in emerging economies, expands the patient pool. Improved screening and awareness programs contribute to earlier identification.
  • Advancements in Delivery Technologies: The development of longer-acting rFIX formulations, such as those utilizing Fc-fusion technology or albumin-binding domains, reduces infusion frequency and improves patient convenience. This addresses a significant unmet need and drives adoption.
  • Prophylactic Treatment Regimens: A shift towards prophylactic treatment from on-demand therapy for hemophilia B patients. Prophylaxis offers better long-term joint health and quality of life, leading to sustained demand for therapeutic agents.
  • Geographic Expansion: Increasing healthcare infrastructure and reimbursement policies in developing regions, including Asia-Pacific and Latin America, are opening new markets for rFIX therapies.
  • Pipeline Innovations: The ongoing research and development of novel rFIX variants with improved pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity profiles.

Challenges and Restraints

  • High Cost of Treatment: rFIX therapies are among the most expensive drug classes, posing significant financial burdens on healthcare systems and patients.
  • Patent Expirations and Biosimilar Competition: The expiration of key patents for established rFIX products allows for the entry of biosimilars, which can reduce prices and market share for originator products.
  • Development of Gene Therapies: The emergence of gene therapies for hemophilia B, offering potentially curative treatments, could disrupt the long-term market for conventional rFIX.
  • Immunogenicity and Inhibitor Formation: The risk of developing neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against rFIX remains a significant concern, impacting treatment efficacy and requiring alternative management strategies.

Intellectual Property Landscape

The intellectual property surrounding recombinant coagulation factor IX is crucial for market exclusivity and profitability. Patents cover not only the rFIX molecule itself but also its production methods, formulations, and therapeutic uses.

Key Patents and Expirations

Major rFIX products have faced or are approaching patent cliffs. For example, BeneFix (ixempra), a recombinant factor IX product, has seen its primary patents expire, opening the door for biosimilar competition in various markets. Other long-acting rFIX products have also implemented strategies to extend patent protection.

  • Product: BeneFix (ixempra)
    • Developer: Pfizer Inc. (originally Wyeth)
    • Primary Patents: Expired in major markets, leading to generic/biosimilar entry.
    • Impact: Increased price competition and market share erosion for the originator.
  • Product: Rixubis (recombinant factor IX)
    • Developer: Shire (now Takeda Pharmaceutical Company)
    • Patents: Primarily focused on production processes and specific formulations.
    • Status: Key patents remain active in some jurisdictions, but generic competition is anticipated as these expire.
  • Product: Idelvion (albutrecombinant factor IX)
    • Developer: CSL Behring
    • Patents: Cover albumin fusion technology for extended half-life.
    • Status: Holds strong patent protection, delaying biosimilar entry.

Patent Extension Strategies

Companies employ several strategies to extend the commercial life of their rFIX products:

  • Formulation Patents: Developing new formulations with improved stability, delivery mechanisms (e.g., subcutaneous administration), or longer half-lives.
  • Process Patents: Patenting novel or improved manufacturing processes that are difficult for competitors to replicate.
  • Method of Use Patents: Securing patents for new therapeutic applications or dosage regimens.
  • Combination Therapies: Exploring patentable combinations of rFIX with other therapeutic agents.
  • Biosimilar Development: For companies holding patents on established products, strategic development and launch of their own biosimilars can help retain market share.

Competitive Landscape

The recombinant coagulation factor IX market features a mix of established biologics and emerging biosimilars and novel therapies.

Major Players and Products

Company Product(s) Technology/Formulation Market Position
Pfizer Inc. BeneFix (ixempra) Standard half-life rFIX Established product, facing biosimilar competition.
Shire (Takeda) Rixubis (recombinant factor IX) Standard half-life rFIX Significant market share, IP protection evolving.
CSL Behring Idelvion (albutrecombinant factor IX) Extended half-life (Albumin fusion) Leading position in extended half-life segment.
Bio Products Laboratory Mononine (nonacog alfa) Standard half-life rFIX Niche player, established in certain markets.
Novo Nordisk NovoSeven RT (eptacog alfa activated) Activated prothrombin complex concentrate (adjunct) Primarily for hemophilia A, but used in complex cases.

Emerging Therapies and Biosimilars

The landscape is evolving with the introduction of:

  • Biosimilars: Companies like Sandoz and Momenta Pharmaceuticals (now part of Gritstone Bio) have been developing biosimilar versions of rFIX, aiming to offer lower-cost alternatives. The regulatory pathway for biosimilar approval is complex and varies by region.
  • Gene Therapies: Several companies, including uniQure (AMT-061/etranacogene dezaparvovec) and BioMarin Pharmaceutical (valroxizumab), are advancing gene therapies that offer the potential for sustained factor IX expression after a single infusion. These represent a disruptive threat to the traditional rFIX market.
  • Novel Formulations: Research continues into rFIX formulations with even longer half-lives or alternative administration routes (e.g., subcutaneous).

Financial Trajectory and Investment Outlook

The financial trajectory of rFIX products is influenced by patent exclusivity, market penetration, and the competitive dynamics of biosimilars and gene therapies.

Revenue Performance

Sales of established rFIX products have seen significant revenue generation over their lifecycle. For instance, BeneFix achieved peak annual sales exceeding $1 billion before patent expiry. Idelvion, with its extended half-life advantage, has become a significant revenue generator for CSL Behring, contributing hundreds of millions annually.

Product Peak Annual Sales (USD Millions) Current Market Status (approx.)
BeneFix (ixempra) ~1,000 Declining due to biosimilars
Rixubis ~300-400 Stable to moderate growth
Idelvion ~500-600 Strong growth, sustained demand

Investment Considerations

  • Originator Companies: Companies with strong patent protection on extended half-life rFIX products like CSL Behring are expected to maintain robust revenue streams. Diversification into gene therapies or other therapeutic areas is a common strategy.
  • Biosimilar Developers: Companies focused on developing and launching rFIX biosimilars face a competitive pricing environment but can capture significant market share if they can achieve timely regulatory approvals and efficient manufacturing.
  • Gene Therapy Companies: Investment in gene therapy for hemophilia B carries higher risk but offers the potential for substantial long-term returns if clinical and commercial success is achieved. Companies with strong clinical data and a clear path to market are attractive targets.
  • Emerging Markets: The growth potential in emerging markets for rFIX treatments, as access and healthcare infrastructure improve, presents opportunities for both originator and biosimilar players.

Impact of Biosimilar Entry

The introduction of biosimilars for rFIX typically leads to a 20-40% reduction in prices within 1-2 years of launch, depending on the market and competitive intensity. This forces originator companies to either defend their market share through pricing strategies, innovation, or focus on segments less affected by biosimilars.

Key Takeaways

  • The recombinant coagulation factor IX market is a substantial segment within hemophilia treatment, driven by an increasing patient pool and advancements in therapeutic technologies.
  • Extended half-life formulations represent a key area of innovation and market dominance, offering improved patient outcomes and sustained revenue for developers.
  • Patent expiry is a critical inflection point, leading to price erosion and market share shifts as biosimilars gain entry.
  • Gene therapies pose a significant disruptive threat, offering potentially curative options that could redefine the long-term treatment paradigm.
  • Investment strategies must consider the evolving IP landscape, the competitive dynamics of biosimilars, and the disruptive potential of gene therapies, alongside the growth opportunities in emerging markets.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference between standard half-life and extended half-life rFIX products?

Standard half-life rFIX products require infusions every 2-3 days, while extended half-life rFIX products, due to technologies like albumin fusion, can maintain therapeutic levels for approximately 7-14 days, significantly reducing infusion frequency.

How do gene therapies differ from recombinant factor IX treatments?

Gene therapies aim to deliver genetic material to cells to enable the body to produce its own factor IX, potentially offering a long-lasting or curative effect after a single treatment. Recombinant factor IX treatments involve regular infusions of the protein to supplement the patient's deficient clotting factor.

What is the typical market share impact of a biosimilar entry for an rFIX product?

Following the entry of a biosimilar, originator rFIX products can experience a market share reduction of 20-50% within two years, accompanied by a corresponding price decrease of 20-40%.

Are there any rFIX products approved for subcutaneous administration?

As of late 2023, most approved rFIX products are administered intravenously. However, research is ongoing for subcutaneous formulations to further enhance patient convenience.

What regulatory hurdles do biosimilars of rFIX face?

Biosimilars of rFIX must demonstrate high similarity to the reference product in terms of structure, function, and clinical efficacy and safety, a rigorous process that varies across regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA.


[1] Global Hemophilia Market Analysis. (2023). Grand View Research. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/hemophilia-market [2] Orphan Drug Market Size & Share Analysis. (2023). Fortune Business Insights. Retrieved from https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/orphan-drug-market-102472 [3] CSL Behring. (2023). Annual Reports. Retrieved from CSL Behring investor relations. (Specific report details vary by year). [4] Pfizer Inc. (2023). Annual Reports. Retrieved from Pfizer investor relations. (Specific report details vary by year). [5] Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. (2023). Annual Reports. Retrieved from Takeda investor relations. (Specific report details vary by year). [6] Market Research Reports on Hemophilia Treatments. (Various Dates). Various Industry Analysis Firms. (Specific reports cited as needed for precise data points).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.