You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Antihemophilic factor (recombinant) - Biologic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for antihemophilic factor (recombinant)
Tradenames:5
High Confidence Patents:0
Applicants:7
BLAs:15
Suppliers: see list8
Recent Clinical Trials: See clinical trials for antihemophilic factor (recombinant)
Recent Clinical Trials for antihemophilic factor (recombinant)

Identify potential brand extensions & biosimilar entrants

SponsorPhase
Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now part of ShirePhase 4
Baxalta US Inc.Phase 4
Baxalta now part of ShirePhase 4

See all antihemophilic factor (recombinant) clinical trials

Note on Biologic Patents

Matching patents to biologic drugs is far more complicated than for small-molecule drugs.

DrugPatentWatch employs three methods to identify biologic patents:

  1. Brand-side disclosures in response to biosimilar applications
  2. These patents were identified from disclosures by the brand-side company, in response to a potential biosimilar seeking to launch. They have a high certainty of blocking biosimilar entry. The expiration dates listed are not estimates — they're expiration dates as indicated by the brand-side company.

  3. DrugPatentWatch analysis and brand-side disclosures
  4. These patents were identified from searching drug labels and other general disclosures from the brand-side company. This list may exclude some of the patents which block biosimilar launch, and some of these patents listed may not actually block biosimilar launch. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

  5. Patents from broad patent text search
  6. For completeness, these patents were identified by searching the patent literature for mentions of the branded or ingredient name of the drug. Some of these patents protect the original drug, whereas others may protect follow-on inventions or even inventions casually mentioning the drug. The expiration dates listed for these patents are estimates, based on the grant date of the patent.

1) High Certainty: US Patents for antihemophilic factor (recombinant) Derived from Brand-Side Litigation

No patents found based on brand-side litigation

2) High Certainty: US Patents for antihemophilic factor (recombinant) Derived from DrugPatentWatch Analysis and Company Disclosures

These patents were obtained from company disclosures
Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Patent No. Estimated Patent Expiration Source
Bayer Healthcare Llc HELIXATE FS, KOGENATE, KOGENATE FS antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 103332 6,060,447 2017-05-09 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Bayer Healthcare Llc HELIXATE FS, KOGENATE, KOGENATE FS antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 103332 6,228,620 2018-05-08 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Bayer Healthcare Llc HELIXATE FS, KOGENATE, KOGENATE FS antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 103332 9,364,520 2029-08-13 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Llc REFACTO antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 103779 6,599,724 2020-07-12 DrugPatentWatch analysis and company disclosures
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Patent No. >Estimated Patent Expiration >Source

3) Low Certainty: US Patents for antihemophilic factor (recombinant) Derived from Patent Text Search

These patents were obtained by searching patent claims

Supplementary Protection Certificates for antihemophilic factor (recombinant)

Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
14C0037 France ⤷  Get Started Free PRODUCT NAME: TUROCTOCOG ALFA; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/13/888 20131113
300663 Netherlands ⤷  Get Started Free PRODUCT NAME: TUROCTOCOG ALFA; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/13/888 20131115
19C1031 France ⤷  Get Started Free PRODUCT NAME: DAMOCTOCOG ALFA PEGOL; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/18/1324 20181126
122014000053 Germany ⤷  Get Started Free PRODUCT NAME: TUROCTOCOG ALFA; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/13/888 20131113
>Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant): A Global Outlook

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

The antihemophilic factor (recombinant) class of biologic drugs has revolutionized the management of hemophilia A, a rare hereditary bleeding disorder characterized by deficiency or dysfunction of coagulation factor VIII. Over the past decade, technological advances, higher demand for targeted therapies, and evolving market landscapes have significantly altered the economic and competitive dynamics within this sector. This analysis explores current market drivers, challenges, and anticipated financial trajectories shaping the future of recombinant antihemophilic factor products.


Market Overview

Prevalence and Treatment Landscape

Hemophilia A affects approximately 1 in 5,000 male live births globally[1]. Standard treatment involves replacement therapy, primarily with factor VIII concentrates—either plasma-derived or recombinant. The recombinant variants dominate over plasma-derived formulations due to superior safety profiles, reduced infection risks, and recent innovations that extend product half-life.

Leading Players and Approvals

The market is led by multinationals including BioMarin, Roche, Bayer, Pfizer, and Sangamo, among others. Key recombinant products comprise Eloctate (rFVIIIFc), Adynovate (rFVIII Fc), and Afstyla (lonoctocog alfa), all designed to improve patient compliance and reduce infusion frequency[2].


Market Dynamics

1. Technological Innovations and Product Pipelines

The primary driver of market growth relates to innovations targeting extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII products. These therapeutics afford less frequent dosing—ranging from weekly to every 2-3 weeks—improving compliance and reducing treatment burden. Companies are investing heavily in Fc-fusion technology, pegylation, and nanobody-based formats to further lengthen half-life[3].

2. Increasing Global Adoption and Access

Rising prevalence estimates and expanding healthcare infrastructure, especially in emerging markets like China, India, and Latin America, fuel growth. Efforts by organizations such as WHO and global health agencies aim to improve access, though high treatment costs remain a barrier, particularly in low-income economies.

3. Pricing Strategies and Reimbursement Policies

Reimbursement frameworks and pricing strategies vary substantially across geographies. In developed markets, reimbursement for innovative EHL products remains favorable, supported by evidence of cost savings through reduced infusion frequency and improved quality of life[4]. Conversely, price pressures and tiered healthcare budgets threaten profit margins.

4. Competitive Landscape and Market Share Dynamics

Market share is increasingly contested by biosimilar products and long-acting biosimilars designed to undercut innovator product prices. Patent expirations of early recombinant products have led to the emergence of biosimilars, intensifying price-based competition[5].

5. Regulatory Environment and Approvals

Stringent regulatory pathways in the U.S. (FDA), Europe (EMA), and other jurisdictions influence product development timelines. Recent approvals of gene therapies and non-factor modalities pose potential disruptions but also expand the therapeutic landscape for hemophilia A.


Financial Trajectory and Forecast

Revenue Expectations

The global hemophilia A market was valued at approximately USD 11 billion in 2021, with recombinant factor VIII products accounting for nearly 70% of sales[6]. Projects estimate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 5-7% from 2022 to 2030, driven primarily by the launch of next-generation long-acting products and expanded access.

Cost Structures and Profitability

Research and development (R&D) costs for recombinant biologics remain high, often exceeding USD 1 billion per product until approval[7]. However, the incremental margin on mature products remains robust, especially as manufacturing processes become more efficient and biosimilar competition increases.

Impact of Biosimilars and Competition

Biosimilar entries are exerting downward pressure on prices, particularly in mature markets. For instance, the introduction of generic-like biosimilars in Europe has reduced per-unit pricing by up to 30%, impacting revenue streams for original biologic manufacturers[8].

Emerging Opportunities

The advent of gene therapies (e.g., valoctocogene roxaparvovec) promises the potential for a paradigm shift from chronic replacement to potentially curative treatments, which could alter long-term revenue expectations. These therapies may command high upfront costs but could reduce cumulative expenditure over a patient’s lifetime[9].


Challenges and Risks

  • Regulatory delays or unfavorable decisions can impede product launches.
  • High development costs and uncertain reimbursement pathways threaten profit margins.
  • Patent cliff risks for early recombinant products may accelerate biosimilar entries.
  • Competition from non-factor modalities like gene therapy and mRNA-based approaches.

Future Outlook and Strategic Insights

The hybridization of technological innovation, regulatory support, and increasing global demand underpin a cautiously optimistic outlook for recombinant antihemophilic factor products. Industry players that prioritize pipeline diversification—integrating longer-acting biologics, biosimilars, and gene therapies—are positioned to sustain growth trajectories. Cost containment measures and strategic partnerships will be essential for navigating price pressures and expanding market access. The transition toward personalized medicine, leveraging pharmacogenomics to optimize dosing and efficacy, could further refine the financial and operational landscape[10].


Key Takeaways

  • Market Growth: The global recombinant antihemophilic factor market is poised for steady growth driven by innovations in half-life extension technologies and expanding access in emerging markets.
  • Pricing and Competition: Price pressures from biosimilars and healthcare payers necessitate strategic pricing, value demonstration, and cost containment strategies.
  • Innovation Pipeline: A strong pipeline of next-generation biologics and curative gene therapies will redefine revenue landscapes over the next decade.
  • Global Access: Bridging affordability gaps remains critical for long-term growth, with partnerships and global health initiatives playing pivotal roles.
  • Investment Opportunities: Companies investing in pipeline expansion, biologics manufacturing efficiencies, and strategic collaborations will likely outperform in a competitive environment.

FAQs

1. How do biosimilars impact the revenue of recombinant antihemophilic factor products?
Biosimilars introduce competitive pricing, leading to significant price reductions of up to 30-50%, which can erode profit margins of branded biologics and force companies to innovate or diversify their pipeline.

2. What role do gene therapies play in the future of hemophilia A treatment?
Gene therapies offer potential cures with a single treatment, possibly reducing or eliminating the need for routine factor VIII infusions. Their emergence could transform the market, impacting revenues from traditional recombinant products.

3. How are pricing strategies evolving in different markets?
In developed markets, payers favor value-based pricing, emphasizing cost savings from reduced infusion frequency. In emerging markets, affordability remains challenging, prompting tiered pricing and global health subsidies.

4. What are the main regulatory challenges faced by recombinant biologics?
Regulatory agencies demand robust clinical evidence for safety and efficacy, particularly for EHL products and biosimilars. Variability in approval pathways across jurisdictions can delay market entry.

5. Can technological innovations sustain revenue growth amid rising competition?
Yes, by continuously improving product efficacy, safety, and convenience, along with expanding indications and access, companies can maintain competitive advantages despite biosimilar and newer modality competition.


References

[1] World Federation of Hemophilia. (2022). Global Hemophilia Statistics.
[2] BioWorld. (2021). Market Trends in Hemophilia A Treatments.
[3] Seppala, E., & Lalu, M. (2020). Advances in Long-Acting Hemophilia Therapies. Blood Reviews.
[4] IMS Health. (2021). Healthcare Economics of Hemophilia Treatments.
[5] IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. (2018). Biosimilar Market Dynamics.
[6] EvaluatePharma. (2022). Hemophilia Market Report.
[7] Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. (2021). Cost of Biologics R&D.
[8] GoodRx. (2022). Impact of Biosimilars on Pricing.
[9] National Hemophilia Foundation. (2021). Emerging Cure Therapies.
[10] European Medicines Agency. (2020). Personalized Medicine in Hemophilia.


Author’s Note: This comprehensive analysis aims to inform business trajectories and strategic planning within the biologic hemophilia market. Staying abreast of technological innovations, regulatory developments, and global health dynamics remains crucial for maximizing opportunities and mitigating risks.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.