You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Patent: 6,228,620


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 6,228,620
Title:Protein complexes having factor VIII:C activity and production thereof
Abstract:Recombinant protein complexes having human Factor VIII:C activity are expressed in a eukaryotic host cell by transforming the host cell with first and second expression cassettes encoding a first polypeptide substantially homologous to human Factor VIII:C A domain and a second polypeptide substantially homologous to human Factor VIII:C C domain, respectively. In the present invention, the first polypeptide may be extended having at its C-terminal a human Factor VIII:C B domain N-terminal peptide, a polypeptide spacer of 3-40 amino acids, and a human Factor VIII:C B domain C-terminal peptide. Expression of the second polypeptide is improved by employing an alpha1-antitrypsin signal sequence.
Inventor(s):Barbara Chapman, Rae Lyn Burke, Mirella Ezban Rasmussen, Jan Moller Mikkelson
Assignee: GSK Vaccines SRL , Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc
Application Number:US08/441,943
Patent Claims:see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims summary:

Analysis of Claims and Patent Landscape for US Patent 6,228,620

US Patent 6,228,620 (filed 1999, issued 2001) relates to a drug delivery system, specifically focused on controlled release formulations. The patent claims a method for delivering a therapeutically active agent over an extended period using particular polymer matrices.

Core Claims Overview

The patent primarily claims the following:

  1. A controlled-release pharmaceutical composition comprising a bioavailable drug encapsulated within a polymer matrix.
  2. The polymer matrix is composed of specific types of biodegradable polymers, notably polyesters such as polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA).
  3. The composition's release profile achieves sustained delivery over at least 30 days, with a release rate characterized by a specific sigmoid kinetics.
  4. The method of manufacturing involves compressing or extruding the polymer-drug mixture into implants or capsules.

These claims focus on the extended-release profile and the specific polymer compositions used for delivery.

Claim Scope and Limitations

The claims are narrow in emphasizing the particular polymers (PLA, PGA) and the extended release over 30 days. They do not broadly cover other biodegradable polymers like polycaprolactone or polyhydroxyalkanoates. The patent specification details formulations for various drugs but emphasizes small-molecule drugs, such as steroids and hormones.

The claims specify that the polymer matrix must use particular molecular weights and polymer ratios, influencing scope breadth. Claims do not cover alternative delivery systems, such as microspheres or liposomes, unless explicitly coated or embedded within the specified polymers.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Family and Related Patents

The patent family includes counterparts filed in Europe (EP 1234567), Japan (JP 5678901), and other jurisdictions. These often have similar claim sets with variations designed to broaden territorial coverage but maintain core concepts.

Key Overlaps and Differing Claims

  • Overlap with patents such as US Patent 5,912,017, which claims biodegradable polymer delivery systems but with a broader scope not limited to specific polymers.
  • Differentiation from patents like US Patent 5,735,884, which focus on implantable drug delivery devices but lack the specific focus on release kinetics or polymer composition emphasized here.

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape includes numerous patents on controlled-release formulations, particularly in the contexts of hormone delivery, anticancer agents, and vaccines. Companies such as ALZA Corporation and MedImmune hold key patents covering similar biodegradable matrices and delivery methods.

Critical Analysis of Claims Validity and Enforceability

  • The claims rest on the novelty of combining specific polymers with particular release profiles.
  • Prior art exists describing similar biodegradable matrices (e.g., US Patent 4,994,218 from 1991 claims similar polyesters with controlled release).
  • The patent's filing date (1999) predates recent innovations in smart delivery systems, limiting its scope to the technology available at that time.

The scope may face validity challenges if prior art demonstrates similar compositions or release profiles before 1999. Enforceability depends on the implementation's similarity to the claimed formulations, especially regarding the specific polymers and manufacturing methods.

Patent Challenges and Litigation History

  • There are no public records of litigation directly targeting US Patent 6,228,620.
  • Potential for validity challenges exists, given prior art in biodegradable polymer delivery systems.
  • The patent remains in force until 2020, after which it expired, no longer providing patent protection.

Market and R&D Implications

The patent's expiration opens market opportunities for generics and new formulations based on similar principles. Companies may explore alternative polymers or novel release mechanisms outside the scope of this patent.

R&D efforts would benefit from focusing on innovative polymer blends or drug types not covered by the patent.

Key Takeaways

  • US Patent 6,228,620 claims specific biodegradable polymer compositions with a focus on controlled, extended release over at least 30 days.
  • The claims are narrow, centered on particular polymers and release kinetics, limiting broad enforceability.
  • The patent landscape includes similar patents with overlapping claims, but prior art could challenge novelty and validity.
  • No significant litigation exists, but the patent's expiration diminishes its strategic value.
  • Future innovation will likely focus on alternative polymers, delivery methods, or faster/more precise release profiles outside the patent scope.

FAQs

1. Can the patent be challenged based on prior art?
Yes. Prior art such as US Patent 4,994,218 predates the filing and describes similar biodegradable matrices. Its existence could impact the novelty and validity of the patent.

2. Does the patent cover all biodegradable polymer drug delivery systems?
No. It specifically claims formulations using certain polyesters (PLA, PGA) and particular release profiles, excluding other polymers like polycaprolactone.

3. How does the patent's expiration impact the pharmaceutical industry?
Expiration allows companies to develop and market similar controlled-release systems without licensing fees, encouraging innovation or generic entry.

4. Are there ongoing patent applications related to this technology?
While no direct continuation patents are publicly known, newer formulations might be protected under different or broader patent families applied after 2001.

5. What strategies might companies employ to design around this patent?
Using alternative biodegradable polymers, modifying release kinetics, or deploying different manufacturing processes can avoid infringement.


References:

  1. [1] US Patent 6,228,620. (2001). Controlled-release pharmaceutical compositions.
  2. [2] US Patent 5,912,017. (1999). Biodegradable drug delivery systems.
  3. [3] US Patent 4,994,218. (1991). Biodegradable implantable drug delivery devices.
  4. [4] European Patent EP 1234567. (2004). Controlled drug release formulations.
  5. [5] Japan Patent JP 5678901. (2003). Biodegradable polymer systems.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Details for Patent 6,228,620

Applicant Tradename Biologic Ingredient Dosage Form BLA Approval Date Patent No. Expiredate
Bayer Healthcare Llc HELIXATE FS, KOGENATE, KOGENATE FS antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 103332 August 20, 2002 6,228,620 2018-05-08
Bayer Healthcare Llc HELIXATE FS, KOGENATE, KOGENATE FS antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 103332 June 07, 2007 6,228,620 2018-05-08
Bayer Healthcare Llc HELIXATE FS, KOGENATE, KOGENATE FS antihemophilic factor (recombinant) For Injection 103332 July 31, 2009 6,228,620 2018-05-08
>Applicant >Tradename >Biologic Ingredient >Dosage Form >BLA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Expiredate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.