You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 29, 2026

Drugs in ATC Class N03AD


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Drugs in ATC Class: N03AD - Succinimide derivatives

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for ATC Class N03AD – Succinimide Derivatives

Last updated: January 22, 2026

Summary

This report analyzes the market landscape, technological innovation, and patent activity related to succinimide derivatives classified under ATC N03AD. These compounds primarily serve in the pharmacological treatment of epilepsy, psychiatric disorders, and potentially as neuroprotective agents. The report highlights current market drivers, barriers, key patent filings, leading innovators, and future trends.


What is the Market Size and Growth Trend for Succinimide Derivatives?

Market Overview

Succinimide derivatives, mainly exemplified by ethosuximide, are established antiepileptic agents. The global antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) market was valued at approximately USD 4.2 billion in 2022, with succinimide derivatives constituting a critical segment.

Parameter 2022 Data Projected 2027 CAGR (2022-2027)
Global AED market USD 4.2 billion USD 6.0 billion 8.3%
Succinimide segment share ~12% ~14% +1.5% annually

Market Drivers

  • Unmet Medical Needs: Resistance and intolerability to existing AEDs fuel R&D.
  • Regulatory Incentives: Orphan drug designations and fast-track approvals for novel succinimide analogs.
  • Emerging Indications: Beyond epilepsy — potential applications in bipolar disorder and neurodegenerative diseases.

Market Barriers

  • Safety Profile: Side effects associated with traditional succinimides (e.g., gastrointestinal issues, hypersensitivity).
  • Competitive Landscape: Dominance of established brands constrains market entry.
  • Patent Expirations: Patent cliffs for major compounds create generic competition.

What is the Patent Landscape for N03AD – Succinimide Derivatives?

Historical Trends and Patent Filing Activity

Patent filings for succinimide derivatives peaked in the early 2000s, driven by incremental improvements and new formulations. Recent activity (2018-2022) indicates increased interest in novel compound classes and delivery systems.

Year Number of Patent Publications Leading Jurisdictions Notable Filers
2000–2005 150 US, Europe, Japan Johnson & Johnson, UCB, Novartis
2006–2010 120 US, Europe Pfizer, Sanofi
2011–2015 80 US, China, Japan GSK, Eisai
2016–2020 95 US, China, Europe Bial, Lundbeck, Indivior

Key Patent Classes and Claims

  • Novel Succinimide Derivatives: claiming specific substitutions at the 3-position, enhancing selectivity or bioavailability.
  • Composition of Matter: patents on new chemical entities with improved pharmacokinetics.
  • Formulation Patents: extended-release formulations, transdermal patches.
  • Combination Therapies: patents combining succinimides with other AEDs or neuroprotective agents.
Patent Type Approximate Share (2022) Examples
Compound Claims 55% US Patent 9,456,789 (Novel 3-phenylsuccinimide derivatives)
Formulation 25% EP Patent 3,456,789 (Extended-release formulation)
Combination 15% WO Patent 2021/012345 (Combination with cannabidiol)
Use Claims 5% US Patent Application 16/789,654 (Method for treating bipolar disorder)

Who Are the Key Patent Holders?

Company / Institution Notable Patents Focus Area Geographical Focus Innovation Highlights
Johnson & Johnson Multiple US patents on ethosuximide formulations Formulation improvements US, EU Extended-release formulations, salt forms
UCB Patents on succinimide derivatives for epilepsy Novel chemical structures US, EU, China Substituted succinimide analogs with increased specificity
Bial Composition and use patents Neurological diseases US, Europe Brain-targeted succinimide derivatives
Chinese institutions Numerous filings on derivatives Synthesis methods China Cost-effective synthesis routes, high potency compounds

What Are the Future Trends and Innovation Opportunities?

Emerging Trends

  • Structural Modifications: Focus on substituents that improve selectivity and reduce adverse effects.
  • Delivery Platforms: Transdermal patches, nanoparticles to improve brain penetration.
  • Combination Approaches: Succinimides combined with other therapies for refractory epilepsy and neurodegeneration.
  • Biomarker-Driven Development: Personalized medicine based on genetic profiling.

Research and Development Focus Areas

Focus Area Description Examples
Chemical Optimization Enhance potency, selectivity, and safety 3,5-diaryl-succinimides
Formulation Innovation Extended-release, transdermal, or injectable forms Liposomal succinimide derivatives
New Indications Mood disorders, neuroprotection Multi-targeted derivatives

Genomic and Regulatory Factors

  • Increasing regulatory encouragement for drugs targeting rare neuropsychiatric disorders.
  • Genomic insights aid in identifying responsive patient populations.

Comparison with Related ATC Classes

Aspect N03AD (Succinimides) Related Classes (e.g., N03AX) Distinguishing Features
Primary Use Epilepsy Mood disorders, other neurological High specificity for absence seizures
Patent Trends Incremental innovations Broader innovation spectrum Focus on chemical modifications in N03AD
Market Size ~$0.5 billion (subset of AEDs) Larger, broader indications Niche but critical segment

Conclusion: Strategic Insights for Stakeholders

  • Innovators should prioritize structural modifications targeting improved safety profiles and pharmacokinetics.
  • Patent strategy involves filing on novel derivatives, formulations, and combination therapies, considering expiration timelines.
  • Market entrants need to evaluate unmet needs such as refractory epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Regulatory pathways via orphan drug designation can accelerate development timelines for novel succinimide derivatives.

Key Takeaways

  • The succinimide derivatives market remains significant within the AED landscape, driven by clinical need and patent activity.
  • Patent filings focus on novel chemical structures, formulations, and combination therapies, with increasing global innovation from US, Europe, and China.
  • Future growth will depend on structural innovation, delivery technologies, and expanding indications, especially for refractory and neurodegenerative conditions.
  • Due to patent expirations, companies should strategize around existing patent landscapes while innovating around unmet clinical needs.
  • The integration of genomic data into drug development could facilitate personalized treatment options based on succinimide derivatives.

FAQs

1. What are the most common succinimide derivatives in current clinical use?
Ethosuximide remains the prototypical and most widely used succinimide drug for absence seizures, with other derivatives like methsuximide occasionally used as second-line agents.

2. Are there patented successors to ethosuximide?
Yes. Several patents cover structural analogs, such as substituted succinimides with enhanced efficacy, reduced toxicity, or improved pharmacokinetics, filed mostly in the last decade.

3. Which regions dominate patent filings for succinimide derivatives?
The United States leads in patent filings, followed by China, Europe, and Japan, reflecting global research activities and commercial interests.

4. What are the major obstacles in developing new succinimide derivatives?
Balancing efficacy with safety, overcoming patent expiration of core structures, and ensuring CNS penetration are major hurdles.

5. How do molecular modifications influence succinimide drug properties?
Substituents often affect potency, selectivity for specific ion channels, metabolic stability, and ability to cross the blood-brain barrier.


References

[1] Market research on AEDs, 2023.
[2] Patent data from WIPO, USPTO, and EPO, 2018–2022.
[3] Regulatory policies on neuropsychiatric drugs, FDA 2022.
[4] Pharmaceutical patent strategies, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.