Last Updated: August 11, 2026

Dastech Intl Company Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the competitive landscape for DASTECH INTL

DASTECH INTL has two approved drugs.



Summary for Dastech Intl
US Patents:0
Tradenames:1
Ingredients:1
NDAs:2

Drugs and US Patents for Dastech Intl

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Dastech Intl DIFLUNISAL diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 073563-001 Nov 27, 1992 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Dastech Intl DIFLUNISAL diflunisal TABLET;ORAL 073562-001 Nov 27, 1992 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Similar Applicant Names
Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

Dastech Intl Pharmaceutical Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, Strength, Patent/IP Leverage, and Competitive Risk

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Dastech Intl’s competitive posture is best evaluated by mapping (1) its clinical and regulatory pipeline focus, (2) its commercial product categories and channels, (3) its sourcing and manufacturing partnerships, and (4) any patent/IP exposure tied to marketed products or products it markets. No public dataset was provided here that identifies Dastech Intl’s specific marketed SKUs, drug substances, pipeline candidates, FDA filings, or any corresponding patent records. Without those identifiers, a complete competitive landscape analysis that ties market position to Orange Book status, patent estate strength, Paragraph IV risk, biosimilar threats, or litigation outcomes cannot be produced accurately.

What does Dastech Intl actually sell, and where does it compete?

Featured snippet answer: A precise competitive landscape for Dastech Intl requires the specific active ingredients, dosage forms, and FDA approvals tied to Dastech Intl’s marketed portfolio.

Which product classes define Dastech Intl’s market footprint?

A competitive analysis should segment Dastech Intl’s competition along:

  • Generic small molecules vs. branded generics
  • OTC vs. prescription
  • Hospital/IDN distribution vs. specialty channels
  • Sterile injectables vs. oral solids
  • Therapeutic area concentration (oncology, cardiology, infectious disease, CNS, etc.)
  • Regulatory posture (505(b)(2), ANDA, 505(j), NDA-associated products)

What commercial metrics determine “market position”?

For actionable market positioning, competitive benchmarking typically uses:

  • Net sales by therapeutic area
  • Volume and share by dosage form
  • Margin sensitivity by category (generics vs. branded vs. specialty)
  • Customer concentration (IDNs, wholesalers, government contracts)
  • Contract manufacturing dependency and supply continuity

How strong is Dastech Intl’s IP and patent estate compared with peers?

Featured snippet answer: Patent strength is not measurable without identifying Dastech Intl’s drug substances and the patents listed in the FDA Orange Book (or relevant national registers for non-US markets).

What patents protect Dastech Intl’s products?

A robust assessment includes:

  • Drug substance patents (composition of matter)
  • Drug product patents (formulations, particle size, polymorphs, co-crystals, delivery systems)
  • Method-of-use patents (indications, dosing regimens)
  • Manufacturing method patents (process controls, crystallization, lyophilization steps)
  • Regulatory exclusivities (NCE, 5-year, 7-year, pediatric, orphan)

How many patents cover each marketed drug?

A defensible approach maps each product to:

  • Patent numbers
  • Patent expiration dates
  • Patent exclusivity expiration vs. patent term
  • Claims scope indicators (active ingredients, excipients, process parameters)
  • ANDA paragraph IV exposure (if applicable)

How does patent strength compare with generic rivals?

Competitive leverage often hinges on:

  • Whether Dastech Intl’s products have “hard barriers” (broad composition claims, narrow generic design-arounds)
  • Whether competitors can enter via carve-outs (label changes, different salt/polymorph)
  • Whether the product is exclusivity-driven (short time window) or patent-driven (multi-year lock)

When does Dastech Intl lose exclusivity, and what generic entry risks exist?

Featured snippet answer: Timing risk requires Orange Book “listed drug” mapping, patent expiration dates, and any FDA exclusivity periods associated with Dastech Intl’s products.

What generic entry risks exist for Dastech Intl products?

Key risk vectors:

  • Paragraph IV filings by challengers
  • Settlement agreements that define launch dates and carve-out scopes
  • Design-around feasibility (alternate polymorph, salt, or formulation)
  • Supply-side bottlenecks that delay generic launches
  • Label-competing indications that reduce substitution

What does “Orange Book status” look like for Dastech Intl’s portfolio?

A complete answer includes, per product:

  • Listed drug name
  • Patent and exclusivity listings
  • Patent-by-patent expiration calendar
  • Whether the product is protected by patents only, exclusivity only, or both

What formulations are protected, and how does delivery system matter?

Featured snippet answer: Formulation protection and delivery-system differentiation can materially delay generic substitution, but only if Dastech Intl’s specific dosage forms and formulations are identified.

What is the typical formulation patent set that protects market exclusivity?

Common protected elements:

  • Controlled release profiles
  • Solid-state forms (polymorphs, hydrates, solvates)
  • Excipients and coating systems
  • Bioequivalence-relevant parameters
  • Sterile manufacturing constraints and stability windows

How does formulation protection affect competitor design-around?

Evaluation should cover:

  • Whether a generic challenger can keep the same active and change the formulation without losing approval pathway
  • Whether the formulation patents claim narrow excipient systems or broad functional outcomes
  • Whether stability or impurity profile claims make manufacturing harder

What patent litigation affects Dastech Intl, including Paragraph IV and settlements?

Featured snippet answer: Litigation exposure requires named parties, case captions, and relevant patent numbers tied to Dastech Intl’s products.

Which companies are challenging Dastech Intl’s products?

A full competitor challenge map needs:

  • ANDA challenger names
  • Filed patent lists and asserted patents
  • Injunction outcomes, dismissals, or trial decisions
  • Settlement dates and stipulated launch triggers

What are the settlement agreement terms that control launch timing?

The competitive impact typically comes from:

  • Launch date carve-outs
  • Authorized generic terms
  • Non-infringement or covenant not-to-sue scope
  • Design-around approvals or required labeling limitations

What is the FDA regulatory status of Dastech Intl’s products and pipeline?

Featured snippet answer: Regulatory status must be tied to specific drug approvals, FDA application numbers, and submission pathways.

What FDA pathway governs Dastech Intl products?

For a competitive map:

  • ANDA pathway for generics (ANDA number, 505(j))
  • 505(b)(2) route for reformulations or bridging studies
  • NDA route for branded or wholly new products
  • Changes to regulatory status over time (supplements, labeling revisions)

How do regulatory milestones influence competitive entry?

Entry sensitivity depends on:

  • Bioequivalence study requirements
  • Transfer/scale-up validation
  • Inspection outcomes and quality agreement terms
  • Submission timing relative to patent expiry and exclusivity windows

How does Dastech Intl compare with peers by competitive strategy?

Featured snippet answer: Strategy comparison requires peer identification (top generic manufacturers, specialty distributors, or branded generics) and alignment of their product categories with Dastech Intl’s portfolio.

Key strategic axes that decide competitive outcomes

A decision-grade comparison should score:

  • Portfolio overlap with high-volume therapeutic categories
  • Manufacturing footprint (sterile vs. non-sterile)
  • Regulatory track record (approvals, refusals, warning letters)
  • IP aggressiveness (patent thickets vs. product substitution readiness)
  • Partner ecosystem (contract manufacturers, distributors, licensing counterparties)

Key Takeaways

  • A complete competitive landscape analysis for Dastech Intl cannot be produced without Dastech Intl’s specific marketed products, active ingredients, dosage forms, FDA application identifiers, and the corresponding Orange Book/patent listings.
  • Patent/IP leverage, exclusivity timing, Paragraph IV exposure, and litigation risk are product-specific and require drug-level mapping.
  • The most actionable next step for a defensible analysis is to anchor on Dastech Intl’s “listed drugs” and then build a patent and exclusivity calendar product-by-product.

FAQs

  1. What does Orange Book “listed drug” status mean for generic competition against Dastech Intl products?
  2. How do Paragraph IV challenges typically impact generic launch timing and authorized generic strategies?
  3. What categories of formulation patents most often block generic substitutions?
  4. Which regulatory pathways (ANDA vs. 505(b)(2) vs. NDA) most affect competitive entry barriers?
  5. How should investors evaluate a generic distributor’s supply and quality risk as a competitive differentiator?

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.