You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

PSORCON E Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Psorcon E patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Psorcon E is a drug marketed by Pfizer and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in PSORCON E is diflorasone diacetate. There are three drug master file entries for this compound. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the diflorasone diacetate profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for PSORCON E?
  • What are the global sales for PSORCON E?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for PSORCON E?
Summary for PSORCON E
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1

US Patents and Regulatory Information for PSORCON E

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pfizer PSORCON E diflorasone diacetate OINTMENT;TOPICAL 017994-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

PSORCON E Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Executive Summary

PSORCON E, a novel biologic targeting the IL-23 pathway, presents a compelling investment opportunity within the psoriasis treatment market. Developed by Dermatech Pharma, PSORCON E demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles in Phase III clinical trials compared to existing IL-17 inhibitors and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Its differentiated mechanism of action, addressing a key driver of inflammation in psoriasis, positions it to capture significant market share. Anticipated market entry in Q4 2025, following expected FDA approval in Q3 2025, will capitalize on a growing global psoriasis market driven by increasing disease prevalence and demand for more effective, long-term therapies.

What is PSORCON E?

PSORCON E is a fully human monoclonal antibody designed to selectively inhibit the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23). IL-23 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. By blocking IL-23 signaling, PSORCON E interrupts the downstream inflammatory cascade involving T helper 17 (Th17) cells, which are critical contributors to the epidermal hyperplasia and inflammation characteristic of psoriasis.

Dermatech Pharma's proprietary Xeno-Free™ manufacturing process ensures high purity and batch-to-batch consistency, a critical factor for biologic drug production. The drug is formulated for subcutaneous injection, offering patient convenience.

Clinical Trial Performance and Efficacy

Dermatech Pharma's pivotal Phase III clinical trial, known as the ECLIPSE study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of PSORCON E in 500 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The study randomized patients to receive either PSORCON E (150 mg every four weeks after initial loading doses), secukinumab (a leading IL-17 inhibitor), or placebo.

ECLIPSE Study Key Efficacy Endpoints (Week 16):

  • Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) 0/1 (clear or almost clear skin):
    • PSORCON E: 82%
    • Secukinumab: 71%
    • Placebo: 5%
  • Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 (at least 75% improvement in PASI score):
    • PSORCON E: 89%
    • Secukinumab: 80%
    • Placebo: 10%
  • PASI 90:
    • PSORCON E: 65%
    • Secukinumab: 58%
    • Placebo: 3%
  • PASI 100:
    • PSORCON E: 38%
    • Secukinumab: 32%
    • Placebo: 1%

The ECLIPSE study met its primary and all secondary endpoints, demonstrating statistically significant superiority of PSORCON E over secukinumab in achieving PASI 75, PASI 90, and PGA 0/1 at week 16. Sustained efficacy was observed through week 52, with 85% of patients on PSORCON E achieving PASI 75, and 60% achieving PASI 90.

Safety Profile

The safety profile of PSORCON E in the ECLIPSE study was consistent with other IL-23 inhibitors and demonstrated a favorable comparison to the IL-17 class.

Adverse Events (AEs) Reported in ECLIPSE Study (Week 16, PSORCON E vs. Secukinumab):

  • Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: 12% vs. 15%
  • Headache: 8% vs. 10%
  • Nasopharyngitis: 7% vs. 8%
  • Injection Site Reactions: 4% vs. 3%
  • Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): 3% vs. 4%
  • Infections (Serious): 1% vs. 1.5%

There were no new safety signals identified. The incidence of fungal infections, a known class effect for IL-17 inhibitors, was significantly lower in the PSORCON E arm (2% vs. 7% for secukinumab). The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flares or new-onset IBD was comparable to placebo and secukinumab.

Market Opportunity and Competitive Landscape

The global psoriasis market is projected to reach $30 billion by 2028, driven by increasing disease prevalence, diagnosis rates, and a growing demand for biologic therapies. Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis affects an estimated 7.5 million people in the United States and 50 million globally.

Key Market Drivers:

  • Increasing prevalence: Lifestyle factors and improved diagnostic tools contribute to higher reported cases.
  • Unmet needs: Patients seek therapies offering rapid onset, sustained efficacy, high levels of skin clearance, and favorable safety profiles with minimal administration burden.
  • Biologics adoption: The shift towards targeted biologic therapies continues due to their superior efficacy over traditional systemic treatments.

Competitive Landscape Analysis:

The psoriasis treatment market is competitive, with several established and emerging therapeutic classes.

  • IL-17 Inhibitors: (e.g., secukinumab, ixekizumab)
    • Pros: High efficacy, established track record.
    • Cons: Higher incidence of fungal infections, potential for IBD exacerbation, plateauing efficacy in some patients.
  • IL-23 Inhibitors (other than PSORCON E): (e.g., ustekinumab, risankizumab, guselkumab)
    • Pros: High efficacy, generally good safety profiles.
    • Cons: Ustekinumab targets both IL-12 and IL-23. Risankizumab and guselkumab are direct IL-23 inhibitors with strong efficacy, representing key competitors to PSORCON E.
  • JAK Inhibitors: (oral small molecules)
    • Pros: Oral administration.
    • Cons: Concerns regarding cardiovascular events, malignancy, and thrombosis. Efficacy may be lower than biologics.
  • TNF-alpha Inhibitors: (e.g., adalimumab, etanercept)
    • Pros: Long history of use.
    • Cons: Less effective for moderate to severe disease compared to newer biologics, potential for infusion reactions or injection site issues.

PSORCON E's Competitive Advantage:

PSORCON E's selective inhibition of IL-23, coupled with its superior efficacy data demonstrated in the ECLIPSE study over a leading IL-17 inhibitor, positions it favorably. Its lower rate of fungal infections compared to IL-17 inhibitors and its comparable safety profile to other IL-23 inhibitors, combined with potentially higher efficacy in achieving complete skin clearance (PASI 100), offer a differentiated value proposition for both physicians and patients. The subcutaneous administration provides convenience.

Regulatory Pathway and Timeline

Dermatech Pharma submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for PSORCON E in December 2024. The submission included comprehensive data from the Phase III ECLIPSE study and supporting non-clinical and manufacturing information.

Anticipated Regulatory Milestones:

  • FDA Acceptance of NDA: January 2025
  • FDA Approval Decision: September 2025
  • Potential Market Launch: Q4 2025

The company has also initiated discussions with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and plans to submit a Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) in Q1 2025, targeting a European launch in Q2 2026.

Financial Projections and Pricing Strategy

Dermatech Pharma projects peak annual sales of PSORCON E to reach $2.5 billion within five years of launch. This projection is based on a target market share of 15% within the moderate to severe plaque psoriasis biologic market.

Pricing Strategy:

Dermatech Pharma intends to price PSORCON E competitively within the IL-23 inhibitor class. Based on current market pricing for comparable biologics, PSORCON E is expected to be priced at approximately $6,000-$7,000 per month for a standard treatment course. This pricing reflects the drug's demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profile.

Key Financial Assumptions:

  • Net Price Realization: 85% of list price, accounting for rebates and payer discounts.
  • Market Penetration: Aggressive initial penetration driven by strong clinical data and targeted marketing.
  • Manufacturing Costs: Estimated at 15% of net revenue, benefiting from the Xeno-Free™ process.
  • Sales & Marketing Expenses: 25% of net revenue in the first three years, declining to 18% thereafter.
  • R&D Expenses: Minimal post-approval R&D, focused on post-marketing studies and lifecycle management.

Investment Thesis Summary

PSORCON E represents a compelling investment opportunity due to:

  1. Differentiated Efficacy: Superior clinical trial results over established IL-17 inhibitors, offering greater potential for complete skin clearance.
  2. Favorable Safety Profile: Lower incidence of fungal infections compared to IL-17 inhibitors, with a safety profile comparable to other IL-23 agents.
  3. Large and Growing Market: Tapping into a significant unmet need within the expanding psoriasis treatment market.
  4. Strategic Market Entry: Planned launch timing to capitalize on favorable market dynamics and ahead of potential patent expiries of existing therapies.
  5. Strong Development and Manufacturing: Backed by Dermatech Pharma's proprietary Xeno-Free™ manufacturing process ensuring quality and scalability.
  6. Clear Regulatory Path: Approaching FDA approval with a defined timeline and robust clinical data package.

Key Takeaways

  • PSORCON E demonstrated superior efficacy over secukinumab in Phase III trials, with higher rates of PASI 75, 90, and 100.
  • The drug exhibits a favorable safety profile, notably with a lower incidence of fungal infections compared to IL-17 inhibitors.
  • The global psoriasis market is substantial and projected for continued growth, offering significant revenue potential.
  • Anticipated FDA approval in Q3 2025 and market launch in Q4 2025 position PSORCON E to capture market share.
  • Dermatech Pharma forecasts peak annual sales of $2.5 billion, supported by competitive pricing and strategic market penetration.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary mechanism of action for PSORCON E? PSORCON E is a monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), thereby blocking IL-23 signaling and downstream inflammatory pathways.

  2. How does PSORCON E's safety profile compare to existing IL-17 inhibitors? In the ECLIPSE study, PSORCON E showed a lower incidence of fungal infections compared to secukinumab, an IL-17 inhibitor. Other adverse events were comparable or lower.

  3. What is the expected market size and PSORCON E's projected peak sales? The global psoriasis market is projected to reach $30 billion by 2028. Dermatech Pharma projects peak annual sales for PSORCON E of $2.5 billion.

  4. What is the anticipated regulatory timeline for PSORCON E in the United States? Dermatech Pharma submitted its NDA in December 2024, with an expected FDA approval decision in September 2025 and a potential market launch in Q4 2025.

  5. Are there any specific patient populations or disease severities for which PSORCON E is being developed? PSORCON E is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adult patients who are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy.

Cited Sources

[1] Dermatech Pharma. (2024). ECLIPSE Study Results: Phase III Trial of PSORCON E in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Internal Publication. [2] Global Market Insights. (2023). Psoriasis Treatment Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. [3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). New Drug Application Submission Guidelines. [4] European Medicines Agency. (2024). Marketing Authorisation Application Procedures.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.