Last Updated: May 3, 2026

NIFEDIPINE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Nifedipine patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Nifedipine is a drug marketed by Acella, Actavis Elizabeth, Chase Labs Nj, Heritage Pharma, Teva, Velzen Pharma Pvt, Alembic, Alkem Labs Ltd, Aurobindo Pharma, Aurobindo Pharma Usa, Elite Pharm Solution, Martec Usa Llc, Novast Labs, Osmotica Pharm Us, Ph Health, Pharmadax, Pharmobedient, Rising, Spil, Twi Pharms, Valeant Pharms North, and Zydus Pharms. and is included in thirty NDAs.

The generic ingredient in NIFEDIPINE is nifedipine. There are thirty-nine drug master file entries for this compound. Thirty-three suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the nifedipine profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Nifedipine

A generic version of NIFEDIPINE was approved as nifedipine by ACTAVIS ELIZABETH on January 8th, 1991.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for NIFEDIPINE?
  • What are the global sales for NIFEDIPINE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for NIFEDIPINE?
Summary for NIFEDIPINE
US Patents:0
Applicants:22
NDAs:30

US Patents and Regulatory Information for NIFEDIPINE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Rising NIFEDIPINE nifedipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 201071-001 Dec 3, 2010 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Osmotica Pharm Us NIFEDIPINE nifedipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 077127-002 Nov 21, 2005 AB2 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Twi Pharms NIFEDIPINE nifedipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 203126-001 Apr 3, 2014 AB2 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Zydus Pharms NIFEDIPINE nifedipine TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 210184-002 Jun 29, 2018 AB1 RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Nifedipine Investment Scenario and Fundamentals Analysis

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is nifedipine and why does it matter commercially?

Nifedipine is a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker used for cardiovascular indications including hypertension and angina. Commercially, it has moved from patent-protected originator status into a mature, generic-dominated market, where pricing, channel execution, and manufacturing cost structure drive returns rather than patent exclusivity.

Core commercial reality: Nifedipine is widely available as immediate-release and extended-release formulations, typically in oral dosage forms. The investment case is therefore anchored in (1) generic market share capture, (2) lifecycle management of formulation variants, and (3) regulatory durability and supply reliability.

Which market fundamentals shape returns for nifedipine?

Market structure: generic-led, volume-driven

  • Nifedipine’s patent estate has largely matured, pushing the product into generic competition.
  • Pricing pressure is structurally tied to the entry of additional abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) and subsequent supply expansions.
  • Revenue growth is therefore constrained; upside usually comes from volume share, payer positioning, and switching between strengths and release profiles.

Demand stability: cardiovascular “baseline”

  • Antihypertensive and antianginal categories show persistent baseline demand.
  • Volume is influenced by guideline adherence, formulary placement, and prescriber familiarity rather than major therapeutic breakthroughs.

Supply and cost: the real determinant

  • For generic cardiovascular drugs, gross margin sensitivity typically tracks:
    • API and key excipient costs,
    • manufacturing yield and batch consistency,
    • regulatory compliance costs and inspection outcomes,
    • logistics and backorder risk.

Competitive intensity: high

  • Multiple manufacturers and multiple strengths create a market where differentiation is limited.
  • Switching drivers often include:
    • reimbursement changes,
    • formulary tender outcomes,
    • pharmacist substitution.

How do formulary and reimbursement dynamics affect nifedipine pricing power?

Payer and formulary outcomes determine whether a manufacturer holds shelf position or is relegated to lower-utilization tiers.

Key levers

  • Formulary listing status by plan type and region.
  • Preferred status for specific release profiles (immediate vs extended) and certain strengths.
  • Therapeutic interchangeability: formulary rules that allow easy substitution reduce margin durability for any one brand or generic.

Implication for investors

  • The durable profit pool is usually in manufacturing scale plus reliable compliance, not brand differentiation.

What is the investment scenario across the supply chain?

1) Generic manufacturers (finished dosage)

Primary value drivers

  • Cost curve (API procurement and manufacturing efficiency)
  • Regulatory execution (timely approval/launch after ANDA triggers)
  • Supply reliability (fewer shortages, fewer batch rejections)

Investment thesis

  • Target manufacturers with strong operating discipline, inspection outcomes, and established API sourcing.
  • Evaluate whether their portfolio includes multiple strengths and release formats to match demand fragmentation.

2) API producers

Primary value drivers

  • Cost position and yield in API crystallization and final specification
  • Ability to secure long-term supply contracts
  • Compliance track record (GMP and inspections)

Investment thesis

  • API producers can benefit from volume stability even when finished dosage pricing is under pressure.
  • Margin durability depends on raw material availability and process robustness.

3) Formulation specialists (extended-release and differentiated release)

Primary value drivers

  • Ability to meet dissolution, bioavailability-relevant performance, and stability targets
  • Changelog management for formulation processes without breaking equivalence assumptions
  • Packaging and shelf-life management to reduce commercial returns

Investment thesis

  • Where product differentiation exists, it is typically limited to release profile performance and ease of dosing, which can matter at the margin for formulary selection.

What are the main product categories to model for demand and pricing?

Immediate-release vs extended-release

  • Immediate-release nifedipine tends to be used in scenarios aligned with rapid onset and dosing schedules.
  • Extended-release formulations are often used to smooth dosing and support adherence.

How to model it

  • Segment revenue and volume by release profile and strength.
  • Track price changes as a function of generics entering the market and relative formulary preference.

Strengths and package economics

  • Packaging size influences pharmacy turnover and distribution economics.
  • Bulk tenders can compress prices and standardize preferred suppliers.

What does the regulatory landscape imply for an investment case?

ANDA competition and lifecycle pressure

  • As generic products proliferate, the product becomes a commodity.
  • FDA approval timelines for new entrants and label changes can reprice the market quickly.

Manufacturing and compliance risk

  • For high-volume generics, compliance lapses create supply shocks that can temporarily lift prices but usually hurt brand continuity.
  • Inspection outcomes can determine whether a manufacturer sustains market share.

How should investors value nifedipine economically?

Use a “margin resilience” model, not a “growth” model

A practical approach is to treat nifedipine as a cash-yielding, low-growth asset where upside comes from:

  • share gains,
  • lower COGS,
  • reduced compliance and supply disruption costs.

Key metrics

  • Gross margin vs industry peers (or vs the company’s own historical baseline)
  • Manufacturing utilization and batch success rate
  • FDA compliance and quality system performance
  • AR turnover and payor mix (if tracked at product level)

Benchmarking guidance

  • Compare price per unit and volume changes across comparable generic launches.
  • Evaluate whether the company holds inventory positions and distribution agreements that protect against shortages.

What is the intellectual property reality for nifedipine?

Nifedipine is a long-established molecule and, at this stage, the commercial IP environment is dominated by:

  • generic filings,
  • formulation and manufacturing process variations,
  • life-cycle protection remnants in some markets (when applicable).

Investment implication

  • Don’t underwrite returns on long-dated exclusivity. Underwrite returns on execution, cost leadership, and regulatory durability.

What are the key diligence questions that determine whether to invest?

Commercial diligence

  • Does the portfolio include both immediate-release and extended-release coverage across key strengths?
  • Does the company have established distribution channels to protect volume during competitive repricing cycles?
  • Are there signs of sustained formulary preference (or loss) across major payers?

Manufacturing diligence

  • API sourcing reliability and batch-level yield performance.
  • Evidence of stable quality metrics and low rejection/recall risk.
  • On-time supply history and capacity planning for demand spikes or competitor disruptions.

Regulatory diligence

  • Recent FDA inspection history and remediation timelines.
  • Changes in site approvals or warning letters that could affect production continuity.

How does geographic exposure change the investment profile?

Generic drug markets vary by:

  • reimbursement regimes,
  • tender systems,
  • market authorization processes,
  • supply chain fragility.

Model it by

  • share and price behavior in the top markets where the company operates,
  • timing of generic entry waves,
  • tender outcomes for hospital and long-term care formularies.

Investment scenarios (base, bull, bear)

Base case

  • Continued generic competition compresses pricing slowly.
  • Volume is steady; share fluctuates with formulary and tender cycles.
  • Returns rely on cost discipline and supply reliability.

Bull case

  • Share gains due to manufacturing reliability, improved cost position, and strong distribution execution.
  • Short-lived market dislocations in supply create temporary pricing relief without long-term deterioration in market access.

Bear case

  • Pricing drops accelerate due to additional entrants or aggressive tender re-bids.
  • Quality or supply disruption creates lost volumes and higher re-entry costs.

Key takeaways for investors

  • Nifedipine is a mature, generic-dominated cardiovascular drug where investment returns come from margin resilience and share capture, not patent-driven exclusivity.
  • Model nifedipine as a cash-yielding, low-growth product with upside driven by cost position, manufacturing reliability, and formulary execution.
  • The decisive diligence areas are regulatory durability, API and batch performance, and distribution strength across immediate-release and extended-release demand.

FAQs

  1. Is nifedipine a growth product in the current market?
    Typically no. It is mature and generic-led, so growth depends on share, not category expansion.

  2. What determines profitability for generic nifedipine suppliers?
    Cost structure (API and manufacturing), compliance-driven supply continuity, and payer/formulary execution.

  3. Do immediate-release and extended-release nifedipine behave differently commercially?
    Yes. They face different dosing patterns and payer preference dynamics, so revenue should be segmented by release profile.

  4. How risky is the investment compared with newer branded cardiovascular drugs?
    Patent risk is lower because the molecule is mature, but competitive pricing and manufacturing compliance risk are central.

  5. What is the best way to underwrite an investment in nifedipine?
    Use a margin and supply reliability framework with volume and price sensitivity tied to generic entry and tender cycles.


References

[1] FDA. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: FDA Approved Drug Products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
[2] National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Nifedipine: Drug Information. PubChem. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
[3] WHO. (n.d.). WHO Model List of Essential Medicines: nifedipine. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essential-medicines/en/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.