Pharmobedient Company Profile

What is the competitive landscape for PHARMOBEDIENT

PHARMOBEDIENT has three hundred and thirteen approved drugs.

There is one tentative approval on PHARMOBEDIENT drugs.

Summary for Pharmobedient

US Patents:	0
Tradenames:	244
Ingredients:	234
NDAs:	313

Drugs and US Patents for Pharmobedient

Applicant	Tradename	Generic Name	Dosage	NDA	Approval Date	TE	Type	RLD	RS	Patent No.	Patent Expiration	Product	Substance	Delist Req.	Exclusivity Expiration
Pharmobedient	SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE	sodium nitroprusside	INJECTABLE;INJECTION	209584-001	Aug 10, 2018	AP	RX	No	No
Pharmobedient	LIDOCAINE	lidocaine	PATCH;TOPICAL	202346-001	Aug 7, 2015	AB	RX	No	No
Pharmobedient	IBANDRONATE SODIUM	ibandronate sodium	TABLET;ORAL	078995-001	Mar 19, 2012		DISCN	No	No
Pharmobedient	NAPROXEN SODIUM	naproxen sodium	TABLET;ORAL	074367-001	Aug 31, 1994		DISCN	No	No
Pharmobedient	NEVIRAPINE	nevirapine	TABLET, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL	206271-001	Nov 9, 2015		DISCN	No	No
Pharmobedient	LIDOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE	lidocaine hydrochloride	SOLUTION;TOPICAL	087881-001	Nov 18, 1982	AT	RX	No	No
Pharmobedient	MENTAX-TC	butenafine hydrochloride	CREAM;TOPICAL	021408-001	Oct 17, 2002		DISCN	No	No

Expired US Patents for Pharmobedient

Applicant	Tradename	Generic Name	Dosage	NDA	Approval Date	Patent No.	Patent Expiration
Pharmobedient	DUONEB	albuterol sulfate; ipratropium bromide	SOLUTION;INHALATION	020950-001	Mar 21, 2001	6,632,842
Pharmobedient	DEMADEX	torsemide	TABLET;ORAL	020136-003	Aug 23, 1993	RE30633
Pharmobedient	ENLON-PLUS	atropine sulfate; edrophonium chloride	INJECTABLE;INJECTION	019677-001	Nov 6, 1991	4,952,586
Pharmobedient	DEMADEX	torsemide	TABLET;ORAL	020136-004	Aug 23, 1993	RE30633
Pharmobedient	AEROSPAN HFA	flunisolide	AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION	021247-001	Jan 27, 2006	5,776,433
Pharmobedient	DEMADEX	torsemide	TABLET;ORAL	020136-001	Aug 23, 1993	4,018,929
Pharmobedient	DEMADEX	torsemide	TABLET;ORAL	020136-002	Aug 23, 1993	RE34672

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for PHARMOBEDIENT drugs

Drugname	Dosage	Strength	Tradename	Submissiondate
	Inhalation Solution	0.021% and 0.042%		2005-10-19

Similar Applicant Names

Applicants may be listed under multiple names.
Here is a list of applicants with similar names.

• Pharm Assoc
• Pharm Res Assoc
• Pharm Spec
• Pharm Ventures
• Pharma Serve Ny
• Pharmaand
• Pharmacare

PHARMOBEDIENT Competitive Landscape Analysis: Market Position, IP Strength, and Strategic Moves

Last updated: July 10, 2026

Executive summary: PHARMOBEDIENT is not identifiable as a specific FDA-approved drug product, biologic, or active ingredient from the information provided. Without a determinable drug identity (active ingredient, brand name, sponsor/MAH, dosage form, and FDA application), no accurate Orange Book status, patent estate, exclusivity windows, Paragraph IV risk, or litigation can be mapped to support a competitive landscape assessment.

What is PHARMOBEDIENT in the US market, and who manufactures it?

Answer: Not determined from the provided input.

What active ingredient does PHARMOBEDIENT contain?

Not determined.

Is PHARMOBEDIENT an NDA, ANDA, BLA, or OTC product?

Not determined.

What dosage forms and strengths exist?

Not determined.

What is the Orange Book status of PHARMOBEDIENT?

Answer: Not determined.

Are there FDA-listed patents for PHARMOBEDIENT?

Not determined.

Which patent types appear (drug substance, drug product, method of use)?

Not determined.

What are the listed expiration dates and exclusivity end dates?

Not determined.

What patents protect PHARMOBEDIENT, and how strong is the patent estate?

Answer: Not determined.

How many patents cover PHARMOBEDIENT across composition, formulation, and use?

Not determined.

Who are the assignees of the key patents?

Not determined.

What jurisdiction coverage exists (US only vs. global families)?

Not determined.

When does PHARMOBEDIENT lose exclusivity or patent protection?

Answer: Not determined.

What are the expected earliest US launch dates for generics?

Not determined.

What exclusivity periods apply (NCE, 5-year, 3-year, pediatric, orphan)?

Not determined.

What is the timing risk for at-risk launches?

Not determined.

What generic entry risks exist for PHARMOBEDIENT, including Paragraph IV?

Answer: Not determined.

Have any Paragraph IV challenges been filed?

Not determined.

Which generic companies are potential challengers?

Not determined.

What settlement or consent judgments affect entry timing?

Not determined.

What formulations are protected by PHARMOBEDIENT patents?

Answer: Not determined.

Are there protected technologies (extended-release, tamper-resistant, particulate, co-crystal)?

Not determined.

Are manufacturing processes patented (drying, granulation, sterilization, aseptic fill-finish)?

Not determined.

What method-of-use patents protect PHARMOBEDIENT?

Answer: Not determined.

Are there line-extension indications (new dosing, patient subsets, combination regimens)?

Not determined.

What claim scopes are likely to be infringed by labeled use?

Not determined.

Which companies are challenging PHARMOBEDIENT, and what does litigation show?

Answer: Not determined.

What patent litigation affects PHARMOBEDIENT?

Not determined.

What are the key court dates and outcomes?

Not determined.

What patents were asserted, and against which generic applicants?

Not determined.

How does PHARMOBEDIENT compare with competing brands and generics?

Answer: Not determined.

What are the therapeutic alternatives and substitution patterns?

Not determined.

How do pricing and access differ among competitors?

Not determined.

Are there competitive differentiation levers (onset, safety, adherence, device delivery)?

Not determined.

What FDA regulatory pathway does PHARMOBEDIENT use, and how does it affect competitive entry?

Answer: Not determined.

Is it approved via 505(b)(1), 505(b)(2), or 505(j)?

Not determined.

Is there REMS, risk management, or restricted distribution?

Not determined.

Are there biosimilar-like risks (if PHARMOBEDIENT is a biologic)?

Not determined.

Commercial strategy: where is PHARMOBEDIENT exposed to revenue erosion?

Answer: Not determined.

What is the maturity of the market (new launch vs. entrenched)?

Not determined.

What are the most likely first-wave generic or switch drivers?

Not determined.

What payer pressures exist (PBM position, formulary status, prior auth)?

Not determined.

Key Takeaways

• PHARMOBEDIENT cannot be connected to a specific US-regulated product, active ingredient, or FDA application based on the provided input.
• No defensible analysis of Orange Book listings, exclusivity timelines, patent scope, Paragraph IV risk, litigation, or competitive substitution can be produced without a determinable drug identity.

FAQs

1. How do I find the correct Orange Book record for a brand when the manufacturer is unclear?
2. What is the typical patent coverage map for a US small-molecule brand (drug substance, drug product, method-of-use)?
3. How does pediatric exclusivity interact with listed Orange Book patents for launch timing?
4. What claim elements most often drive non-infringement or design-around arguments in Paragraph IV cases?
5. What data points best predict generic erosion risk for an established brand (patent count, expirations, exclusivity end dates, litigation posture)?

References

1. Not provided.