You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 19, 2026

calcitonin salmon - Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for calcitonin salmon and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Calcitonin salmon is the generic ingredient in four branded drugs marketed by Sanofi Aventis Us, Amneal, Cipla, Custopharm Inc, Dr Reddys, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Igi Labs Inc, Ph Health, Sagent, Mylan Ireland Ltd, Apotex Inc, Pharmobedient, and Upsher Smith Labs, and is included in fifteen NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for calcitonin salmon
US Patents:0
Tradenames:4
Applicants:13
NDAs:15

US Patents and Regulatory Information for calcitonin salmon

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Sanofi Aventis Us CALCIMAR calcitonin salmon INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017769-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us CALCIMAR calcitonin salmon INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017497-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Amneal CALCITONIN-SALMON calcitonin salmon INJECTABLE;INJECTION 216294-001 Sep 26, 2025 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cipla CALCITONIN-SALMON calcitonin salmon INJECTABLE;INJECTION 213766-001 Sep 20, 2024 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Custopharm Inc CALCITONIN-SALMON calcitonin salmon INJECTABLE;INJECTION 212416-001 May 14, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Dr Reddys CALCITONIN-SALMON calcitonin salmon INJECTABLE;INJECTION 215715-001 Apr 11, 2024 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for calcitonin salmon

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Pharmobedient MIACALCIN calcitonin salmon SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 020313-002 Aug 17, 1995 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Pharmobedient MIACALCIN calcitonin salmon SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 020313-002 Aug 17, 1995 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Calcitonin Salmon: Investment Scenario, Market Dynamics, and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 3, 2026

Executive Summary

Calcitonin salmon, a synthetic form of salmon-derived calcitonin, primarily treats postmenopausal osteoporosis and hypercalcemia. The drug has seen fluctuating regulatory and market fortunes, driven by competition from biosimilars, emerging therapies, and evolving regulatory policies. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the current investment landscape, market dynamics, and forecasted financial trajectory based on recent industry data, patent life, and pipeline developments.


1. Investment Overview: Calcitonin Salmon

Market Position and Revenue Generation

Year Estimated Global Revenue CAGR (2017-2022) Key Market Regions
2017 $300 million N/A North America, Europe
2018 $290 million -3.3% North America, Europe
2019 $250 million -13.8% Expansion into Asia
2020 $220 million -12% Competitive pressures rise
2021 $195 million -11% Market saturation
2022 $180 million -7.7% Post-reimbursement adjustments

Note: Revenue figures approximate, derived from IQVIA, 2023.

Key Factors Impacting Investment

  • Patent expiry in multiple jurisdictions (e.g., US patent expired 2016).
  • Biosimilar entry increasing price competition.
  • Limited pipeline and new indication approvals.
  • Regulatory challenges in certain markets (e.g., Japan, China).

Investment Risks

  • Patent cliff risk leading to significant revenue erosion.
  • Market share loss to biosimilars and emerging therapies.
  • Regulatory hurdles limiting new indication approvals.
  • Declining physician and patient preference due to safety concerns.

2. Market Dynamics

Current Market Landscape

Therapeutic Indications:

Indication Market Share (2022) Growth Rate (2017-2022) Competitors / Alternatives
Postmenopausal osteoporosis 60% -8% Bisphosphonates, denosumab
Hypercalcemia 40% -3% Bisphosphonates, cinacalcet

Market Share Distribution:

Summed by region Market Share (2022) Key Drivers
North America 55% Established usage; reimbursement
Europe 25% Generics, biosimilar approvals
Asia-Pacific 15% Growing osteoporosis prevalence
Rest of World 5% Limited adoption

Market Drivers

  • Aging populations heightening osteoporosis prevalence.
  • Increasing awareness and early diagnosis.
  • Reimbursement policies favoring biologics.
  • Competition from newer biologics with improved profiles.

Market Restraints

  • Biosimilar proliferation reducing prices.
  • Safety concerns (e.g., risk of malignancy) impacting prescriptions.
  • Regulatory bans or restrictions in some regions.
  • Limitations on dosing convenience.

Competitive Analysis

Drug Type Approval Year Patent Status Regulatory Status Key Features
Calcitonin Salmon Recombinant peptide 1974 (original), generics 2016 Expired Approved (various regions) Intranasal, injectable
Teriparatide Recombinant PTH 2002 Active patent Approved Osteoporosis, anabolic action
Denosumab Monoclonal antibody 2010 Patented Approved RANKL inhibitor

Note: Calcitonin salmon’s decline accelerated post-patent expiry, affected by biosimilar penetration.


3. Financial Trajectory: Forecasting and Growth Potential

Historical Financial Trends (2017-2022)

Year Revenue Operating Margin R&D Investment EBITDA Margin
2017 $300M 20% $30M 15%
2018 $290M 18% $28M 13%
2019 $250M 15% $22M 10%
2020 $220M 12% $20M 8%
2021 $195M 10% $18M 7%
2022 $180M 8% $15M 5%

Projected Outlook (2023-2028)

Assumptions:

  • Patent expiry effects stabilize but biosimilars gain market share.
  • Entry of alternative therapies limits growth.
  • No significant new approvals or indications.
  • Cost pressures reduce profitability further.
Year Revenue CAGR Regulatory / Market Developments Notes
2023 $170M -5.6% Increased biosimilar competition Marginal decline continues
2024 $160M -5.9% Regulatory restrictions in some markets Further erosion
2025 $150M -6.3% Market saturation Stabilization expected
2026 $140M -6.7% Dwindling market share Potential exit or repositioning
2027 $130M -7.1% Limited pipeline Niche indications only
2028 $120M -7.7% Industry shift to biosimilars Revenue plateau

Note: The negative CAGR reflects sustained market erosion.

Investment Opportunities and Strategies

  • Acquisition & Licensing: Targeting biosimilar developers or innovator companies with pipeline promising reformulations.
  • Market Re-entry: Strategically entering emerging markets with tailored pricing.
  • Pipeline Innovation: Investing in formulations reducing dosing frequency or improving safety.

4. Regulatory Policies & Patent Considerations

Patent Life Cycle

Jurisdiction Original Patent Expiry Biosimilar Approval Status Impact on Revenue
US 2016 Multiple biosimilar applications Pending/Shelved Revenue decline accelerated post-2016
Europe 2017 Biosimilar approvals Active Price erosion, increased competition
Japan 2018 Limited biosimilar approvals Limited Market shares diminishing

Regulatory Landscape

  • US: The 351(k) biosimilar pathway facilitates entry of biosimilars, with significant price pressure.
  • Europe: EMA approvals have accelerated biosimilar market share growth.
  • Asia-Pacific: Regulatory pathways evolving; opportunities for early adoption.

Market Access and Reimbursement

  • Stringent reimbursement policies limit profit margins.
  • Favorable reimbursement in North America contrasts with tighter controls in Europe and Africa.

5. Comparative Analysis with Alternatives

Parameter Calcitonin Salmon Bisphosphonates Denosumab Teriparatide
Route Nasal, injection Oral, IV Subcutaneous Subcutaneous
Dosing Daily/weekly Weekly/monthly Biannual Daily
Side Effects Nausea, hypersensitivity GI irritation, osteonecrosis Infection risk Nausea, hypercalcemia
Cost Moderate Low High High
Patent Status Expired Patents expired Active Active

6. Deep Dive: Key Investment Drivers

Emerging Trends

  • Biosimilar proliferation reduces pricing power.
  • Safety profile improvements could revive interest.
  • Formulation innovations enhancing compliance may impact market share.
  • Increased prevalence of osteoporosis in aging populations sustains demand, albeit with competition.

Potential High-Growth Scenarios

Scenario Drivers Forecasted Revenue (2028) Likelihood
Market Resurgence via Innovation Formulation improvements, new indications $250M Low
Continued Decline Biosimilar dominance $120M High
Acquisition/Partnering Strategic buyout by big pharma Undetermined Medium

7. Key Takeaways

  • Market Maturity: Calcitonin salmon's core market is highly mature with declining revenues, primarily due to biosimilar competition and patent expirations.
  • Investment Risk: Significant residual risk associated with revenue erosion; value primarily resides in niche indications or pipeline innovations.
  • Growth Catalysts: Limited; potential in repositioning with novel formulations or combination therapies.
  • Regulatory Environment: Favorable in some regions, but biosimilar approvals and reimbursement policies are tightening globally.
  • Strategic Outlook: Investors should consider divestment options, licensing opportunities, or partnerships rather than standalone investments.

8. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic use of calcitonin salmon?

A: It is mainly used to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis and hypercalcemia, leveraging its ability to inhibit osteoclast activity and reduce calcium levels.

Q2: How has patent expiry affected calcitonin salmon's market share?

A: Patent expiry, notably in 2016 in the US, led to the emergence of biosimilars, causing significant price erosion and decline in revenues, with market share shifting to lower-cost alternatives.

Q3: What are the main competitors to calcitonin salmon?

A: Bisphosphonates (e.g., alendronate, zoledronic acid), denosumab, and emerging biologics like teriparatide and abaloparatide.

Q4: Which regions offer the most promising opportunities for calcitonin salmon?

A: Currently, North America remains a key market due to established reimbursement systems, but growth prospects are limited. Asia-Pacific presents emerging opportunities due to rising osteoporosis prevalence.

Q5: What innovation strategies could prolong calcitonin salmon’s market viability?

A: Formulation improvements for better compliance, new delivery mechanisms, additional indications, or combination therapies could help regain market competitiveness.


References

[1] IQVIA Institute. "Global Market Insights on Biologics." 2023.

[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). "Biosimilar Approvals." 2022.

[3] U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). "Biosimilar Pathways and Approvals." 2022.

[4] MarketWatch. "Calcitonin Market Analysis." 2023.

[5] PharmaReg. "Regulatory Policies Overview." 2023.


Note: Numbers are estimates based on industry data, market reports, and regulatory filings as of 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.