Last Updated: May 10, 2026

PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Prometh Hydrochloride,phenylephrine Hydrochloride W/codeine Phosphate patents expire, and when can generic versions of Prometh Hydrochloride,phenylephrine Hydrochloride W/codeine Phosphate launch?

Prometh Hydrochloride,phenylephrine Hydrochloride W/codeine Phosphate is a drug marketed by Genus Lifesciences and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE is codeine phosphate; phenylephrine hydrochloride; promethazine hydrochloride. There are nineteen drug master file entries for this compound. One supplier is listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the codeine phosphate; phenylephrine hydrochloride; promethazine hydrochloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE?
  • What are the global sales for PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE?
Summary for PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Genus Lifesciences PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE,PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE codeine phosphate; phenylephrine hydrochloride; promethazine hydrochloride SYRUP;ORAL 040660-001 Dec 7, 2006 AA RX No Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market dynamics and financial trajectory for PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE, PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What product is being analyzed?

PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE, PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE is a fixed-dose combination cough/cold product that pairs:

  • Promethazine hydrochloride (antihistamine)
  • Phenylephrine hydrochloride (nasal decongestant)
  • Codeine phosphate (opioid antitussive)

The exact commercial presentation (strength, dosage form, package size) drives pricing and supply, and the financial trajectory depends on the specific National Drug Code (NDC) line(s) in market. Without that mapping, this analysis addresses market dynamics and the typical financial path of this drug class at the product level (combination opioid-containing cough products) using regulatory and market-structure drivers.

How do regulatory and payer dynamics shape demand?

1) Opioid-in-cough regulation compresses growth

Codeine-containing cough medicines face persistent restrictions because codeine is an opioid with safety risk and abuse potential. In the US, the FDA has limited codeine use in cough/cold products, including age restrictions and risk controls that reduce eligible patient populations and reduce prescriber willingness, especially for non-severe URIs.

Direct market effect

  • Lower addressable volume than non-opioid cough therapies.
  • Slower adoption in newer channel strategies versus non-controlled antitussives.

2) Promethazine safety profile increases utilization friction

Promethazine products carry sedation and respiratory-depression risk when misused or combined with CNS depressants. That increases:

  • Tighter prescribing behavior in higher-risk populations
  • Higher probability of substitution by safer alternatives (non-sedating antihistamines, non-opioid antitussives)

3) Decongestant effectiveness scrutiny alters substitution patterns

Phenylephrine has faced scrutiny on clinical effectiveness for oral cold use. Where payers and pharmacy formularies penalize low-value therapies, substitution flows toward:

  • Topical decongestants
  • Non-decongestant symptom regimens
  • Non-opioid cough suppressants (dextromethorphan, benzonatate)

Net effect Demand stays more resilient where prescribers treat the product as a legacy standard, but growth is constrained by repeated value and safety substitution pressures.

What market structure dynamics determine competitive positioning?

1) Fixed-dose combinations compete on “form factor,” not on differentiation

This category typically sells as a convenience product. Competition is mostly substitution-based:

  • Same symptom target (cough with URI)
  • Preferential use of single-ingredient or non-opioid formulations
  • Retail pharmacy switching at the shelf

2) Controlled-substance supply chain adds compliance costs

Where codeine is present:

  • Wholesale acquisition and distribution require stronger monitoring
  • Pharmacy dispensing requires controlled-substance workflow compliance
  • Increased shrink and audit exposure raises effective cost-to-serve

These costs do not eliminate demand, but they cap margin expansion and push manufacturers toward either volume protection or niche channel strategies.

How do reimbursement and channel economics usually evolve?

Typical revenue model for this class

For combination cough/cold products, revenue tracks:

  • Unit volume (script counts or OTC equivalent sales where applicable)
  • Net pricing (rebates, chargebacks, copay assistance, wholesaler terms)
  • Channel mix (retail vs. institutional)
  • Inventory cycles and discontinuation risk if demand declines

Likely financial trajectory drivers

  • Peak-then-decline pattern: Legacy opioid-containing cough products typically plateau as clinical guidance shifts and prescriber habits change.
  • Erosion from substitution: Growth is structurally hard because safer and non-opioid alternatives attract both prescribers and formularies.
  • Margin pressure via compliance and contracting: Even if gross price holds, net price declines via competitive contracting and higher compliance overhead.

What does the likely pricing and volume behavior look like?

Because a fixed-dose, opioid-containing cough combination has more restrictions than non-opioid products, the market typically behaves as follows:

Market variable Expected direction for this class Mechanism
Script/dispense volume Flat to declining Safety controls, substitution, age restrictions for codeine use
OTC/retail shelf throughput Flat to declining Consumer/consumer-advocacy shift toward safer regimens
Net price Flat to declining Contracting pressure and competition from non-opioid brands and generics
Gross-to-net spread Widening or unstable Rebates/chargebacks when competing for formulary or channel share
Operating margin Stable to compressing Compliance and distribution costs rise relative to growth

What are the core demand segments and how do they change?

Retail and prescriber segments

This product tends to concentrate sales in:

  • General practice and urgent care for uncomplicated URIs
  • Retail dispensing where prescribers use legacy regimens

Segment shift

  • As clinical pathways emphasize non-opioid treatment, the product loses incremental share to alternatives.
  • The product remains most durable where it is already embedded in prescribing patterns and where a prescriber does not view substitution as necessary.

What events can accelerate decline?

1) Labeling or risk-management tightening

Any change in opioid cough product labeling or enforcement raises reluctance to prescribe.

2) Formulary updates and pharmacy benefit tightening

Plan formularies and pharmacy program rules can block or tier the product higher, reducing patient access and script conversion.

3) Competitive launches by non-opioid antitussive regimens

Newer symptom-management products with better safety narratives tend to take share quickly during URIs because switching costs are low.

How does seasonality affect financial trajectory?

Respiratory seasonality affects cough/cold categories in two ways:

  • Winter surges create short-term revenue spikes.
  • Summer demand remains lower and often exposes whether supply and inventory are optimized.

For opioid-containing cough combinations, seasonality does not fix structural demand erosion, but it can mask early decline by creating periodic peaks.

What is the likely financial trajectory (three-phase model)?

Phase 1: Late-cycle maturity

  • Revenue stabilizes as the product maintains base usage.
  • Net pricing stays pressured by generic and non-opioid competition.
  • Operating margin is constrained by compliance and contracting.

Phase 2: Substitution-driven volume contraction

  • Scripts decline gradually as alternatives become default.
  • Pharmacy switching and payer policy reduce incremental demand.
  • Inventory management becomes more volatile, and wholesaler orders slow.

Phase 3: Low-growth survival mode

  • The product survives as a legacy option or niche prescription choice.
  • Growth is replaced by defense of shelf space.
  • Financials show reduced investment appetite unless there is a regulatory or competitive discontinuity in alternatives.

Competitive and substitution map: where sales typically migrate

In practice, demand shifts from opioid-containing combination cough products to:

  • Non-opioid antitussives (commonly used for symptom control)
  • Single-ingredient regimens that reduce sedation or respiratory risk
  • Non-decongestant approaches when decongestant value is questioned

The direction is consistent across payer settings: where safety and evidence skew, substitutions occur at both the prescriber and pharmacy level.

What would a “good” vs “weak” financial outcome look like?

Good outcome (best-case within this category)

  • Maintains base volume through embedded prescribing patterns
  • Holds net price via channel contracts
  • Keeps gross-to-net stable despite compliance costs
  • Avoids major formulary restrictions

Weak outcome (base-case risk)

  • Continues gradual volume erosion
  • Net price declines via competitive contracting
  • Gross-to-net widens due to rebate and channel pressure
  • Margin compresses because fixed compliance costs do not scale down as fast as demand

Key business indicators to watch

Even without the specific NDC-level financials, decision-grade signals for this category include:

KPI Why it matters
Dispensed units or prescriptions trend Captures substitution and access loss
Retail-to-wholesale order behavior Shows inventory confidence and demand realignment
Gross-to-net ratio changes Reflects contracting pressure and competitive bidding
Formulary tier status and prior auth rules Direct access limiter for payers
Safety communication updates Drives prescriber behavior quickly

Bottom-line market dynamics

For PROMETH HYDROCHLORIDE, PHENYLEPHRINE HYDROCHLORIDE W/CODEINE PHOSPHATE, the market dynamic is not “competitive advantage.” It is a constrained demand platform shaped by opioid risk controls, sedation risk, and continuous substitution toward safer and evidence-supported cough and cold regimens. Financial trajectory in this category usually follows a mature, then contracting, then survival pattern, with net pricing pressure and margin compression risks tied to compliance and payer contracting.


Key Takeaways

  • The product sits in a high-friction demand category due to codeine opioid risk controls and promethazine safety constraints.
  • Market growth is structurally limited by substitution to non-opioid cough treatments and regimen simplification.
  • Financial outcomes typically show plateau then volume decline, with net pricing pressure and gross-to-net spread instability from contracting.
  • Seasonality drives peaks but does not reverse the long-run substitution trend.

FAQs

  1. Is this product positioned as OTC or prescription in the market?
    It depends on jurisdiction and specific commercial presentation; opioid-containing cough products often face tighter access rules that reduce broad retail uptake.

  2. What is the main driver of demand contraction for codeine cough combinations?
    Safety regulation and clinical substitution toward non-opioid symptom control.

  3. How do payers influence sales of this type of combination?
    Formulary placement, prior authorization, and tiering reduce access and shift patients to alternative therapies.

  4. What channel metrics best indicate financial trajectory?
    Dispensed units/prescriptions trend, order behavior, gross-to-net changes, and formulary restriction status.

  5. Can winter seasonality offset multi-year decline?
    It can create short-term revenue spikes, but it usually does not reverse structural substitution patterns.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Codeine cough and cold products” (FDA safety communications and labeling restrictions).
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Promethazine” drug safety and labeling information regarding sedation and respiratory risk.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug labeling and safety communications for opioid-containing cough and cold medications.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.