Last Updated: September 24, 2026

MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Mannitol 15% W/ Dextrose 5% In Sodium Chloride 0.45% patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Mannitol 15% W/ Dextrose 5% In Sodium Chloride 0.45% is a drug marketed by B Braun and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% is mannitol. There is one drug master file entry for this compound. Nine suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the mannitol profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45%?
  • What are the global sales for MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45%?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45%?
Summary for MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45%
Recent Clinical Trials for MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45%

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityPHASE4
Stanford UniversityPHASE1
Emmanuel CarreraPHASE2

See all MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45%

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
B Braun MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45% mannitol INJECTABLE;INJECTION 016080-005 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for MANNITOL 15% W/ DEXTROSE 5% IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.45%

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Pharmaxis Europe Limited Bronchitol mannitol EMEA/H/C/001252Bronchitol is indicated for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) in adults aged 18 years and above as an add-on therapy to best standard of care. Authorised no no no 2012-04-13
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal
Last updated: July 30, 2026

Mannitol 15% with Dextrose 5% in Sodium Chloride 0.45% market dynamics and financial trajectory: pricing, demand, exclusivity, and generic entry risks

Mannitol 15% with dextrose 5% in sodium chloride 0.45% is a parenteral combination infusion used to support osmotherapy and fluid/electrolyte management in inpatient settings. Market value is driven by hospital formularies, procurement contracts, drug shortages, and generic substitution of multi-dose IV products. The financial trajectory is typically characterized by (1) steady institutional demand with episodic demand spikes around supply constraints and seasonal utilization shifts, and (2) margin compression after generic availability expands.

However, a complete, decision-grade financial trajectory (revenues, units, price history, and forecast) cannot be produced from the information provided.

What drives market demand for mannitol 15% w/ dextrose 5% in sodium chloride 0.45% in hospitals?

Demand for this specific IV combination is pulled by inpatient pathways rather than outpatient prescribing. Use patterns generally tie to:

  • Neurosurgery and neurocritical care protocols where osmotherapy with mannitol is selected
  • Perioperative fluid strategies where additional carbohydrate support is used
  • Critical care and dehydration risk management where osmotic agents are deployed
  • Institutional preference for ready-to-administer compounded solutions, reducing pharmacy compounding labor and sterility risk

Commercial determinants with the highest impact

  • Formulary inclusion and substitution policy: whether a hospital lists brand and allows automatic therapeutic substitution among equivalent mannitol IV products.
  • Shortage frequency in mannitol-containing infusions: shortages shift utilization toward available suppliers and can lift interim pricing.
  • Procurement concentration: group purchasing organizations and large IDNs (integrated delivery networks) move volume to lowest-cost suppliers.
  • Supply chain feasibility: container format (commonly premix bags), fill/finish constraints, and lead times for bulk dextrose/saline components.

Which settings consume the most mannitol dextrose saline infusions?

The highest utilization is typically in:

  • Neuro-ICUs and neurosurgery service lines
  • Surgical ICUs using osmotherapy protocols
  • Large inpatient systems with standardized pathways

How do pricing and reimbursement dynamics work for this IV combination product?

Pricing for hospital-only IV infusions is primarily contract-based. Key mechanisms include:

  • WAC-to-contract spread: list pricing (WAC) often diverges materially from realized hospital net price due to rebates and procurement discounts.
  • GPO-negotiated ceiling prices: contract pricing can reset multiple times per year.
  • NADAC (where applicable) and wholesaler pass-through: net price is influenced by wholesaler economics and state-level reimbursement rules for non-HOPD contexts.

Margin pressure points

  • Generic entry typically forces downward contract pricing across the category of mannitol-containing IV infusions.
  • Supply disruptions can temporarily support price premiums by restricting availability.
  • Inventory holding and cold chain are less relevant than for biologics but become important if volatility increases due to shortage risk.

When does mannitol-containing IV competition intensify and hurt gross margins?

Financial trajectory for combination IV products usually follows a predictable cycle:

  1. Pre-competition period: limited branded supply supports higher realized pricing.
  2. Generic launch period: multiple ANDA filers for equivalent strengths and similar compositions increase competitive pressure.
  3. Post-launch consolidation: a smaller set of suppliers wins share via best contract pricing and reliable manufacturing capacity.
  4. Periodic shortage resets: if manufacturing constraints emerge, non-favorable contracts may be repriced.

What generic entry risks exist for this product?

The main generic entry risks are operational and regulatory rather than clinical:

  • ANDA approval timing for comparable composition/strength and dosage form
  • Manufacturing equivalency (container, stability, osmolality and pH targets)
  • Formulation constraints affecting sterility, particle burden, and shelf life
  • Demand switching during shortage or supply interruption that benefits the best-positioned generic supplier

What patents protect mannitol 15% w/ dextrose 5% in sodium chloride 0.45%, and when do they expire?

A complete patent landscape requires the specific reference product name as listed on the FDA label and the Orange Book entry tied to the exact strength and composition. With only the descriptive product composition and no listed FDA reference product or Orange Book record, a full and accurate set of protecting patents and expiration dates cannot be compiled.

What is the Orange Book status of mannitol 15% with dextrose 5% in sodium chloride 0.45%?

Orange Book status depends on the existence of a listed FDA reference product for that exact composition and strength, and the associated NDA/BLA. Without an FDA identifier (NDA number) tied to the exact formulation, the Orange Book listing status, exclusivity periods, and listed patent expirations cannot be determined.

Which companies supply this product and how does that affect market share?

Market share for IV infusion products is primarily a function of:

  • GPO/IDN contracting
  • National accounts and distributor allocation
  • Availability during shortages
  • Consistency of supply and product format compatibility

A defensible company-by-company market share map cannot be produced without:

  • the FDA label reference product identifier(s)
  • current authorized distributors and NDC-level supply records

How does this product compare with alternative osmotherapy and IV hydration regimens?

This product competes commercially against:

  • Other mannitol strengths or mannitol-only infusions with separate dextrose and saline administration
  • Alternative osmotic regimens used in neurocritical care workflows
  • Compounded institutional mixtures where pharmacies prepare equivalent formulations

Substitution pressure

  • If hospitals can meet protocols using mannitol-only plus separate fluids, combination product demand can soften when pricing rises.
  • If workflow and procurement favor premixed combinations, substitution is less likely even if alternative regimens exist.

What FDA regulatory pathway governs generics of this IV infusion?

Generics of small-molecule IV solutions are typically pursued via the ANDA route when a reference NDA exists for the exact formulation and strength, with reliance on:

  • bioequivalence where relevant (for systemic exposure) and
  • sterility, stability, and physicochemical equivalence standards for parenterals

For this product, the exact regulatory pathway cannot be stated without the FDA reference product identifier and current approval status.

What patent litigation or Paragraph IV challenges affect financial expectations?

Paragraph IV litigation risk is tied to:

  • existence of Orange Book-listed patents
  • ANDA filings challenging those patents
  • court outcomes and settlement terms

Without the Orange Book record and any filed ANDAs for the exact composition and strength, no litigation chronology or settlement impact can be mapped.

How should investors and licensors size revenue exposure for this product category?

Revenue sizing for hospital infusion SKUs is usually done at the NDC or contract-line level using:

  • wholesaler/retail pharmacy sales datasets
  • hospital purchasing contracts
  • IDN formularies and procurement coverage

A category-level investment thesis for mannitol-containing premix infusions generally rests on:

  • volume stability tied to inpatient utilization
  • price-down risk from generics
  • upside during shortages
  • switching costs if hospitals standardize premixed solutions

A quantitative revenue exposure model cannot be produced from the current input.


Key Takeaways

  • Market demand is hospital-driven and shaped by neurocritical care protocols, formulary policy, and supply stability.
  • Financial trajectory typically shows margin support pre-competition, margin compression after generic entry, and pricing resets during shortage events.
  • A decision-grade view of patents, Orange Book status, litigation, and precise financial trajectory requires the exact FDA reference product/NDA and NDC-linked data.
  • Competitive risk is mostly substitution and contract pricing dynamics rather than clinical differentiation.

FAQs

  1. How do shortages of mannitol-containing IV solutions impact hospital contract pricing?
  2. Do combination premix osmotherapy products lose share to mannitol-only plus separate dextrose/saline regimens?
  3. What manufacturing factors most often determine the shelf-life and stability of premixed mannitol/dextrose/saline IV bags?
  4. How do GPO contract resets typically change realized net price for IV infusions after generic launches?
  5. What data sources best estimate unit volume and revenue for hospital IV infusion SKUs (NDC-level)?

References

No sources were cited because the required FDA identifier, Orange Book record, and company/NDC-level market data were not provided.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.