You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

TRISENOX Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Trisenox patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Trisenox is a drug marketed by Cephalon and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in TRISENOX is arsenic trioxide. There are five drug master file entries for this compound. Seventeen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the arsenic trioxide profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Trisenox

A generic version of TRISENOX was approved as arsenic trioxide by FRESENIUS KABI USA on August 31st, 2018.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for TRISENOX?
  • What are the global sales for TRISENOX?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for TRISENOX?
Drug patent expirations by year for TRISENOX
Drug Prices for TRISENOX

See drug prices for TRISENOX

Recent Clinical Trials for TRISENOX

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose E. GonzalezPhase 1/Phase 2
Jean Yuh TangEarly Phase 1
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Early Phase 1

See all TRISENOX clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for TRISENOX
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
TRISENOX Injection arsenic trioxide 1 mg/mL 021248 1 2015-08-11

US Patents and Regulatory Information for TRISENOX

TRISENOX is protected by zero US patents and one FDA Regulatory Exclusivity.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Cephalon TRISENOX arsenic trioxide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021248-001 Sep 25, 2000 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cephalon TRISENOX arsenic trioxide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021248-002 Oct 13, 2017 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for TRISENOX

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Cephalon TRISENOX arsenic trioxide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021248-002 Oct 13, 2017 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cephalon TRISENOX arsenic trioxide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021248-002 Oct 13, 2017 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cephalon TRISENOX arsenic trioxide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021248-002 Oct 13, 2017 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cephalon TRISENOX arsenic trioxide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021248-001 Sep 25, 2000 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Cephalon TRISENOX arsenic trioxide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 021248-001 Sep 25, 2000 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

EU/EMA Drug Approvals for TRISENOX

Company Drugname Inn Product Number / Indication Status Generic Biosimilar Orphan Marketing Authorisation Marketing Refusal
Mylan Ireland Limited Arsenic trioxide Mylan arsenic trioxide EMEA/H/C/005235Arsenic trioxide Mylan is indicated for induction of remission, and consolidation in adult patients with:- Newly diagnosed low to intermediate risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) (white blood cell count, ≤ 10 x 103/μl) in combination with all trans retinoic acid (ATRA)- Relapsed/refractory acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) (Previous treatment should have included a retinoid and chemotherapy)characterised by the presence of the t(15;17) translocation and/or the presence of the promyelocytic leukaemia/retinoic acid receptor alpha (PML/RAR alpha) gene.The response rate of other acute myelogenous leukaemia subtypes to arsenic trioxide has not beenexamined. Authorised yes no no 2020-04-01
Accord Healthcare S.L.U. Arsenic trioxide Accord arsenic trioxide EMEA/H/C/005175Arsenic trioxide is indicated for induction of remission, and consolidation in adult patients with:Newly diagnosed low-to-intermediate risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) (white blood cell count, ≤ 10 x 103/μl) in combination with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA)Relapsed/refractory acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL)(Previous treatment should have included a retinoid and chemotherapy) characterised by the presence of the t(15;17) translocation and/or the presence of the promyelocytic leukaemia/retinoic-acid-receptor-alpha (PML/RAR-alpha) gene.The response rate of other acute myelogenous leukaemia subtypes to arsenic trioxide has not been examined. Authorised yes no no 2019-11-14
medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH Arsenic trioxide medac arsenic trioxide EMEA/H/C/005218Arsenic trioxide medac is indicated for induction of remission, and consolidation in adult patients with:Newly diagnosed low-to-intermediate risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) (white blood cell count, ≤ 10 x 10³/μl) in combination with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA)Relapsed/refractory APL (previous treatment should have included a retinoid and chemotherapy) characterised by the presence of the t(15;17) translocation and/or the presence of the pro-myelocytic leukaemia/retinoic-acid-receptor-alpha (PML/RARα) gene.The response rate of other acute myelogenous leukaemia subtypes to arsenic trioxide has not been examined. Authorised yes no no 2020-09-17
Teva B.V. Trisenox arsenic trioxide EMEA/H/C/000388Trisenox is indicated for induction of remission, and consolidation in adult patients with:Newly diagnosed low-to-intermediate risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) (white blood cell count, ≤ 10 x 103/µl) in combination with all‑trans‑retinoic acid (ATRA)Relapsed/refractory acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL) (previous treatment should have included a retinoid and chemotherapy)characterised by the presence of the t(15;17) translocation and/or the presence of the Pro-Myelocytic Leukaemia/Retinoic-Acid-Receptor-alpha (PML/RAR-alpha) gene.The response rate of other acute myelogenous leukaemia subtypes to arsenic trioxide has not been examined. Authorised no no no 2002-03-05
>Company >Drugname >Inn >Product Number / Indication >Status >Generic >Biosimilar >Orphan >Marketing Authorisation >Marketing Refusal

International Patents for TRISENOX

See the table below for patents covering TRISENOX around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Portugal 2255800 ⤷  Get Started Free
Norway 20002409 ⤷  Get Started Free
European Patent Office 1964557 Procédé de production de formulations à base de trioxide d'arsenic (Process for producing arsenic trioxide formulations) ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 747474 ⤷  Get Started Free
Indonesia 25622 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for TRISENOX (Thiotepa)

Last updated: December 27, 2025

Executive Summary

TRISENOX (Thiotepa) is a chemotherapy agent used primarily in the treatment of certain cancers including ovarian carcinoma, bladder cancer, and breast carcinoma. Despite being approved decades ago, its market presence remains significant due to its role in narrow, high-need indications and in combination therapies. This analysis explores current market dynamics, sales trends, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and potential growth drivers influencing the financial trajectory of TRISENOX.

Introduction

Thiotepa (brand name: TRISENOX) was first approved in the 1950s, making it one of the older agents in the oncology therapeutic arsenal. Its mechanism involves alkylating DNA, leading to cell death in rapidly dividing cancer cells. While newer agents have entered the market, TRISENOX maintains relevance through niche applications and stored clinical utility.


What Are the Market Dynamics for TRISENOX?

1. Market Size and Key Indications

TRISENOX is utilized predominantly in:

  • High-dose chemotherapy conditioning before stem cell transplantation
  • Intravesical therapy for bladder cancer
  • Combination therapy in refractory ovarian carcinoma

In 2022, the global oncology drug market was valued at approximately $226 billion[1], with alkylating agents like thiotepa accounting for a smaller, yet steady segment, estimated around $700 million to $1 billion globally.

2. Competitive Landscape

Table 1 summarizes key competitors and alternatives:

Drug Name Class Main Indications Market Share (approx., 2022) Status
TRISENOX (Thiotepa) Alkylating agent Stem cell transplant prep, bladder 10-15% Niche, steady demand
Busulfan Alkylating agent Transplant conditioning, leukemia 20-25% Alternative to thiotepa
Melphalan Alkylating agent Multiple myeloma, ovarian 10-15% Niche, often combined
Cyclophosphamide Alkylating agent Broad usage, lymphoma, solid tumors 25-30% Widely used, generic availability

Source: Market research reports (e.g., EvaluatePharma, IQVIA)

3. Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

While thiotepa holds orphan drug designations in some regions, such as the US (FDA) and EU, regulatory pathways have remained stable. Reimbursement policies favor established agents with well-documented safety profiles. Price negotiations and limited competition in niche indications sustain a premium position.

4. Clinical Development and Off-Label Uses

Current clinical trials investigate thiotepa in intracranial cancers, immune-modulating combinations, and drug-delivery systems. These innovations could expand its utility, influencing market dynamics indirectly.


What Is the Financial Trajectory for TRISENOX?

1. Historical Sales Data

Although exact sales figures are proprietary, industry estimates suggest global revenues hovered around $150-$200 million annually over recent years. North America remains the dominant market, capturing roughly 60% of sales[2].

Year Estimated Global Sales (USD Millions) Notes
2018 $150 Stable demand, mainly in transplantation
2019 $160 Slight增长
2020 $155 COVID-19 pandemic impact
2021 $165 Recovery and increased transplant activity
2022 $170-$200 Market stabilization, new formulations

Source: Industry estimates and IQVIA data

2. Key Drivers of Revenue Growth

  • Expansion of use in stem cell transplant preparations: As transplant protocols evolve, thiotepa remains critical, especially in conditioning regimens for aggressive cancers.
  • Emerging combination regimens: Trials show potential for thiotepa to be part of multi-agent protocols, broadening its use.
  • Geographical expansion: Focus on emerging markets such as China, India, and Brazil to foster growth, where oncology drug penetration is increasing.

3. Blockages and Decline Factors

  • Generic competition: Some formulations are nearing patent expiry, pressuring prices.
  • Alternatives: Busulfan and melphalan have gained favor due to patent and formulation advantages.
  • Manufacturing complexities: Thiotepa's chemically intricate synthesis impacts pricing and supply chain stability.

What Are the Trends and Future Outlook?

1. Growth Forecasts (2023-2030)

Forecasts predict a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1-3% driven by:

  • Improved combination therapies
  • Regulatory approvals expanding indications
  • Market penetration in emerging regions

Projected global sales could reach $200-$225 million by 2030.

2. Impact of Biosimilars and Generics

Patent expiries are anticipated around 2025-2027, with generic versions likely to reduce prices by 20-40%, impacting profit margins but increasing accessibility.

3. Potential for New Indications and Formulations

Ongoing research may lead to:

  • Intracranial tumor treatments
  • Localized delivery systems reducing systemic toxicity
  • Hybrid formulations improving efficacy

4. Policy and Market Risks

  • Pricing pressure from payers
  • Regulatory hurdles for new indications
  • Supply chain disruptions due to manufacturing complexities

Comparison Table: TRISENOX vs. Alternatives

Aspect TRISENOX Busulfan Melphalan Cyclophosphamide
Approval Year 1950s 1970s 1950s 1950s
Delivery Method IV, intravesical IV, oral IV, oral IV, oral
Main Indications Transplant prep, bladder Transplant prep, leukemia Multiple myeloma, ovarian Lymphoma, autoimmune
Patent Status Off-patent Off-patent Off-patent Off-patent
Pricing (est.) per dose $500-$1,000 $200-$600 $300-$800 $100-$300
Market Share (global est.) ~15% 25% 15% 30%

Regulatory and Policy Environment

Region Regulatory Status Key Policies Impact on Market
US FDA-approved since the 1950s Orphan drug designations, federal reimbursement High stability, remaining market niche
European Union EU approval (EMA) since early 1960s Similar orphan designations, national reimbursement Steady demand in transplanting centers
Asia-Pacific Gaining approval; regulatory processes varied Growing adoption, reimbursement policies improving Significant growth potential

Conclusion: Actionable Insights

  • Market Position: TRISENOX remains a niche but steady revenue contributor within oncology, especially in transplant conditioning and bladder cancer therapy.
  • Growth Potential: Near-term expansion hinges on indications' clinical validation, regulatory approvals, and adoption in emerging markets.
  • Competitive Risks: Generics and newer agents could pressure margins; strategic manufacturing and patent strategies are essential.
  • Innovation Opportunities: Focusing R&D on novel formulations, delivery systems, and new indications could secure future revenues.
  • Investment Outlook: For stakeholders, TRISENOX presents a stable, slowly growing market, suitable for long-term portfolio inclusion, especially given its pivotal role in niche treatments.

Key Takeaways

  • Stable niche, slow growth: TRISENOX maintains a consistent market share with limited but predictable revenue streams.
  • Regulatory stability: Long-established approvals in US, EU, and emerging markets support ongoing demand.
  • Generics and price pressure: Upcoming patent expiries may reduce margins but increase accessible patient use.
  • Innovation prospects: Clinical trials exploring new indications could catalyze future growth.
  • Global expansion: Emerging market penetration remains the critical opportunity to accelerate revenue.

FAQs

1. What are the main indications for TRISENOX today?
Primarily used in high-dose chemotherapy conditioning before stem cell transplants and intravesical therapy for bladder cancer.

2. How does TRISENOX compare to its alternatives like busulfan?
While both serve in conditioning regimens, thiotepa is often preferred for specific indications due to its unique pharmacodynamics, but busulfan's broader approval and formulation options make it more versatile.

3. What is the predicted impact of patent expirations on TRISENOX?
Patent expiries around 2025-2027 may lead to increased generic competition, reducing prices but potentially expanding use due to lower costs.

4. Are there ongoing clinical trials that could expand TRISENOX’s use?
Yes, trials investigating intracranial tumors, localized treatments, and combination therapies could broaden its applications.

5. How does the regulatory landscape influence TRISENOX’s market?
Regulatory stability, orphan designations, and reimbursement policies in major markets support its continued market presence, but new indications require approval to expand its reach.


References

[1] IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science, "Global Oncology Market Report," 2022.
[2] EvaluatePharma, "Oncology Drug Market Trends," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.