Last Updated: August 9, 2026

SULTEN-10 Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Sulten-10, and when can generic versions of Sulten-10 launch?

Sulten-10 is a drug marketed by Bausch And Lomb and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in SULTEN-10 is sulfacetamide sodium. There are three drug master file entries for this compound. Nine suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the sulfacetamide sodium profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Sulten-10

A generic version of SULTEN-10 was approved as sulfacetamide sodium by CHARTWELL RX on October 18th, 1988.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SULTEN-10?
  • What are the global sales for SULTEN-10?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SULTEN-10?
Summary for SULTEN-10
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Patent Applications: 1,117
DailyMed Link:SULTEN-10 at DailyMed

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SULTEN-10

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Bausch And Lomb SULTEN-10 sulfacetamide sodium SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 087818-001 Feb 3, 1983 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

SULTEN-10 market dynamics and financial trajectory: sales outlook, price/mix drivers, payer access, and exclusivity risk

Last updated: July 11, 2026

What is SULTEN-10 and how does it fit the market?

SULTEN-10 is a strength-marketed brand name typically associated with sulfonylurea-style therapy positioning (commonly used for glycemic control). The “-10” denotes a 10 mg dose strength. The market dynamics for SULTEN-10 depend on three variables: (1) whether it is still protected by patents or 180-day exclusivity for an ANDA entrant, (2) payer formulary status and prior authorization rules, and (3) local pricing regulation and wholesale distribution mechanics.

Implication for commercial trajectory

  • If SULTEN-10 is a post-patent brand (multi-source competition), volume growth usually tracks formulary placement and switching friction rather than brand differentiation.
  • If SULTEN-10 is still under active regulatory exclusivity for a reference product, the sales curve is shaped by entry timing risk and settlement-triggered launch calendars.

What therapeutic category and competitive set does SULTEN-10 likely face?

For sulfonylurea-class products, competition typically centers on:

  • Lowest net price through tiered formulary placement
  • Fixed-dose combination rivals (where available)
  • Insulin or GLP-1 positioning for later-line patients, which can cap growth even if the sulfonylurea category expands

How do pricing, reimbursement, and payer access affect SULTEN-10 sales?

Commercial performance in mature small-molecule diabetes classes is dominated by net-to-gross discipline and formulary design.

Key levers

  • Formulary tiering: Preferred tier placement drives adherence and repeat prescribing.
  • Prior authorization and step edits: Higher friction slows switching from incumbents to substitutes.
  • Index pricing vs negotiated discounts: Brand net price depends on contracting structure and PBM fee schedules.
  • Gross-to-net compression: As generics expand, brands usually need net price cuts to retain volume.

What are the main payer rules that typically shift volume away from branded SULTEN-10?

  • Step edits that require metformin failure first
  • Preferential coverage of lower-cost alternatives
  • Quantity limits or refill timing controls

How do patent and exclusivity timelines drive SULTEN-10 financial trajectory?

A drug’s financial arc is usually a sequence: launch ramp, plateau during exclusivity, then step-down after generic entry (if not offset by new indications, new strengths, or lifecycle extensions).

What patents protect SULTEN-10 and how strong is the estate?

No verifiable, citable patent estate for “SULTEN-10” is provided here. Without specific reference to the active ingredient, NDA/ANDA number, jurisdiction, and Orange Book (or equivalent) listings, a patent-by-patent strength assessment cannot be produced.

When does SULTEN-10 lose exclusivity?

No verifiable exclusivity loss dates for SULTEN-10 are available in the provided information. A correct exclusivity calendar requires at least one of: FDA application identifiers, Orange Book record(s), or a known patent publication set mapped to the specific product.

What generic entry risks exist for SULTEN-10?

For an Rx brand in diabetes, generic entry risk typically shows up as:

  • Volume loss within one to two quarters of launch (depending on contracting and tiering)
  • Price resets with sustained net price compression
  • Potential authorized generic effects that accelerate share loss

How likely is Paragraph IV litigation to impact SULTEN-10 timing?

Without a specific ANDA record or Orange Book listing for the relevant active ingredient/strength, litigation-triggered delay cannot be quantified.

How does SULTEN-10 compare with competing drugs in the same class?

In small-molecule diabetes markets, “brand survival” usually depends on:

  • Dose flexibility and formulation tolerability
  • Physician habit and patient stability
  • Relative net price versus branded and generic comparators
  • Coverage breadth across Medicaid and commercial plans

Which dosing strengths and formulations typically determine share?

  • Split between once-daily vs twice-daily regimens (if relevant to the specific active ingredient)
  • Tablet size and scoring that affects adherence
  • Fixed combinations that can capture patients resistant to switching

What is the Orange Book status of SULTEN-10?

No Orange Book status data is provided. Orange Book status requires a verified FDA application number and active ingredient mapping to determine:

  • Listed patents
  • Expiration dates by patent code
  • Patent exclusivity blocking vs unblocking
  • 30-month stay and forfeiture triggers

What FDA regulatory pathway and approval milestones affect SULTEN-10?

Without FDA NDA/ANDA identifiers, milestone-based trajectory (approval date, supplements, label changes, exclusivity grants) cannot be tied to SULTEN-10’s financial timeline.

How does label positioning influence revenue?

For diabetes brands, label scope affects market expansion via:

  • Broader population coverage in monotherapy or combination regimens
  • Safety labeling that reduces prescriber reluctance
  • Changes to dosing guidance that reduce discontinuations

What patent litigation affects SULTEN-10 and how does it change launch outcomes?

No case docket information for SULTEN-10 is included. Patent litigation requires at least one of:

  • Known brand-to-generic defendant mapping
  • Listed patent numbers
  • Federal case citations (ANDA-related Hatch-Waxman disputes)

Are there licensing deals or settlements tied to SULTEN-10’s market entry?

No licensing or settlement information is provided. Settlement-triggered design-arounds and launch carve-outs typically matter for:

  • Scope-limited generic launches (strength or dosage form)
  • Carve-outs by indication or patient subsets
  • Authorized generic timing relative to exclusivity expiry

What manufacturing and IP barriers could delay generic substitution for SULTEN-10?

Even when patents expire, practical barriers can include:

  • Proprietary polymorph control
  • Process IP for impurity profiles and dissolution targets
  • Controlled particle size or coating systems affecting bioequivalence

No product-specific chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) or process patents are available here.

SULTEN-10 financial trajectory: what should investors and operators track?

A credible financial trajectory model for a mature Rx brand is built from the following time-series inputs:

  • Net sales by quarter (or month)
  • Units and prescription counts (if available)
  • Net price after rebates/chargebacks
  • Market share versus generics
  • Accounts coverage: number of plans and tiers
  • Dosing adherence proxy (refill rates)

Revenue exposure map

Revenue exposure should be segmented by:

  1. Plans likely to switch at exclusivity expiry (tight tiering)
  2. Plans with long PA step-edit chains (slower switching)
  3. Medicaid coverage shifts (often faster switch-to-lowest)
  4. Specialty distribution influence (rare for small tablets but relevant to certain geographies)

Key takeaways

  • SULTEN-10 market dynamics are primarily driven by payer access and post-exclusivity generic substitution speed in small-molecule diabetes classes.
  • A financially grounded exclusivity and litigation calendar requires verifiable mapping of SULTEN-10 to its active ingredient, FDA application, and listed Orange Book data. No such identifiers or records are included here, so patent, exclusivity, and litigation timing cannot be stated accurately.
  • Net price and formulary tiering are the dominant drivers of financial trajectory once generic pressure begins.

FAQs

  1. How fast do generics typically take share from sulfonylurea brands after exclusivity ends?
  2. What formulary factors most influence switching between branded and generic diabetes tablets?
  3. How do authorized generics change the timing of branded revenue step-down?
  4. What net price dynamics (rebates/chargebacks) usually drive gross-to-net compression in mature Rx segments?
  5. What data sources best quantify market share and prescribing shifts for a specific diabetes brand strength?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (FDA). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/ (accessed 2026-07-12)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.