Last Updated: August 8, 2026

SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Sublimaze Preservative Free patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Sublimaze Preservative Free is a drug marketed by Rising and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE is fentanyl citrate. There are thirty-one drug master file entries for this compound. Six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the fentanyl citrate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Sublimaze Preservative Free

A generic version of SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE was approved as fentanyl citrate by HIKMA on July 11th, 1984.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE?
  • What are the global sales for SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE?
Summary for SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 34
DailyMed Link:SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE at DailyMed

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Rising SUBLIMAZE PRESERVATIVE FREE fentanyl citrate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 016619-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AP RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: July 21, 2026

SUBLIMAZE Preservative Free market dynamics and financial trajectory: sales trends, pricing pressure, exclusivity and generic/biosimilar risk

Executive summary: “Sublimaze Preservative Free” is a branded fentanyl injection product (fentanyl citrate) in a preservative-free formulation. Market dynamics are dominated by inpatient anesthesia and procedural sedation demand, hospital formulary controls, and tightening competition from generic fentanyl citrate injection. Financial trajectory is typically characterized by (1) stable but mature volume consumption tied to surgery volumes, (2) periodic payer and group purchasing organization (GPO) pricing pressure, and (3) erosion of brand share where branded-to-generic substitution is feasible through FDA approval pathways and Orange Book landscape. The key near-term financial driver is the extent and timing of generic availability and any residual brand exclusivity from specific strengths, package configurations, labeling protections, or reformulation patents.

What is SUBLIMAZE Preservative Free and how is it used commercially?

Fast answer: Sublimaze Preservative Free is used to provide analgesia during anesthesia and procedural sedation. Commercial demand tracks surgical procedure volumes, inpatient procedure scheduling, and institutional anesthesia practice patterns that specify formulation attributes (including preservative-free suitability for certain clinical workflows).

Where does demand come from?

  • Hospital inpatient anesthesia (operating rooms, endoscopy suites, interventional radiology).
  • Procedural sedation settings where clinicians prefer preservative-free options based on institution protocols and patient safety workflow preferences.
  • Substitution dynamics: hospitals often standardize to a single fentanyl injection SKU via GPO contracts, which can accelerate branded share erosion when generics have equivalent usability and supply continuity.

How do dosing formats affect procurement?

  • Procurement is sensitive to strength availability, pack size, and handling requirements (e.g., drawability, pharmacy storage practices).
  • Preservative-free presentation can be a differentiator at the formulary level, but it does not prevent substitution if equivalent generic presentations are available.

How competitive is the fentanyl injection market and what drives pricing pressure?

Fast answer: The fentanyl injection category is highly exposed to generic competition because the active ingredient is a mature opioid and multiple manufacturers can supply fentanyl citrate injection products.

Market structure

  • Branded fentanyl products coexist with multiple generic fentanyl citrate injection products.
  • Competition often centers on:
    • Wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) vs. net price after discounts/rebates.
    • GPO contract awards and pharmacy buyer switching.
    • Supply reliability during periods of opioid supply volatility.

Key pricing and margin dynamics

  • Net price compression is usually driven by:
    • institutional switching to lowest-cost equivalent products,
    • contract renewals,
    • and payer-led cost controls for anesthesia supplies.
  • Brand margin risk increases when:
    • a preservative-free generic equivalent enters,
    • a hospital can substitute without clinical restrictions,
    • or procurement consolidates suppliers to a small approved list.

When does exclusivity end for Sublimaze Preservative Free and what does that imply for sales?

Fast answer: For mature branded fentanyl products, the commercial inflection usually comes from the end of any remaining brand-specific exclusivity tied to the specific presentation (strength, preservative-free configuration, or method-of-use/labeling protections).

What investors look for

  • Orange Book exclusivity indicators
    • whether any drug product exclusivity remains on the specific NDA/strength (different from active ingredient patent life),
    • and whether the label contains protections that can affect generic substitution timing.
  • Patent estate coverage vs. generic entry
    • if patents remain enforceable against generic infringement, generics may delay launch or face litigation.

Financial implication

  • After exclusivity/patent barriers decline:
    • brand revenue typically shifts to declining trajectories as generic price competition increases,
    • and the brand’s role becomes “preferred” only where preservative-free or institutional preferences support continued use.

What patents protect SUBLIMAZE Preservative Free and how strong is the patent estate?

Fast answer: The fentanyl injection space has layered IP: active ingredient process/polymorph-style protections have largely matured historically, so the remaining commercial protection for a specific product presentation generally hinges on:

  1. formulation or manufacturing method patents unique to a preservative-free product,
  2. drug product composition or packaging/presentation claims,
  3. labeling/method-of-use patents tied to clinical use instructions.

How patent strength translates to financial trajectory

  • Strong and enforceable patents on the specific preservative-free presentation can slow generic substitution and sustain sales.
  • If the patent estate is narrow or easy to design around, generic entry can accelerate erosion of branded market share and net revenue.

What is the Orange Book status of Sublimaze Preservative Free and are there Paragraph IV challenges?

Fast answer: Orange Book status and any Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) challenges are the primary levers for predicting branded-to-generic revenue erosion. For a mature fentanyl brand, the pattern typically shows multiple ANDA approvals for fentanyl citrate injection strengths as generic equivalents become available.

How to read risk indicators

  • Listed patents on the brand’s NDA indicate the likely periods of generic launch delay.
  • Generic filings and amendments suggest the presence or absence of patent challenges.
  • Paragraph IV notices (if any) map to the likelihood of:
    • delayed generic approval,
    • litigation-driven settlement timelines,
    • or faster launch if patents are not asserted or invalidated.

Which companies produce generic fentanyl citrate injection that can replace Sublimaze Preservative Free?

Fast answer: Multiple generic manufacturers supply fentanyl citrate injection products; competitive pressure typically comes from the presence of several interchangeable generics in the same strengths and presentations.

Competitive landscape patterns

  • Hospitals shift to a small number of approved generic SKUs.
  • Brand share depends on:
    • contract terms,
    • perceived clinical equivalence,
    • and pharmacy conversion practices.

What drives switching

  • Lower net price of generics.
  • Availability of preservative-free generic equivalents at the needed strengths.
  • Pharmacy and anesthesia supply chain standardization.

How does Sublimaze Preservative Free compare with other fentanyl injection products (preservative-free vs multi-dose)?

Fast answer: The competitive differentiator is typically formulation presentation rather than the active ingredient. Preservative-free positioning matters for clinical workflows that restrict preservatives or require preservative-free handling.

Decision factors for clinicians and formularies

  • Preservative-free requirements in local protocols.
  • Compatibility with dilution and administration workflows.
  • Storage and stability expectations under hospital handling.

Procurement implications

  • If generics replicate preservative-free presentation, switching risk rises sharply.
  • If generics lack equivalent preservative-free formats at the needed strengths, the brand can retain a smaller “preferred” niche.

What generic entry risks exist for Sublimaze Preservative Free?

Fast answer: The highest generic entry risk is associated with ANDA approvals for:

  • preservative-free fentanyl citrate injection at the same strengths and comparable pack sizes, and
  • Orange Book pathways that are not blocked by enforceable patents or exclusivity.

Risk escalation triggers

  • New generic launches listed on the Orange Book for the same NDA/strength.
  • Litigation outcomes that remove patent barriers.
  • Settlement terms that permit earlier-than-expected generic entry.

What patent litigation affects fentanyl injection brands and how does that impact timelines?

Fast answer: In this class, litigation impacts market timing primarily by:

  • triggering automatic stays (depending on the procedural posture),
  • prompting settlement agreements that specify launch dates,
  • and creating leverage for design-around strategies.

How to map litigation to financial outcomes

  • Settlement launch dates can lock in:
    • brand revenue corridors through the settlement end date,
    • and predictable generic revenue ramp post-launch.
  • Court outcomes affect the probability of generic entry and the expected velocity of market share loss.

How does FDA regulatory status affect commercialization and substitution?

Fast answer: FDA status affects substitution through approval pathway availability and label equivalence.

What matters in practice

  • ANDA approval and labeling parity with the brand’s critical sections (indications, dosing, warnings).
  • Interchangeability in hospital protocols and the availability of therapeutically equivalent products.

What are the commercial milestones that shape Sublimaze Preservative Free’s financial trajectory?

Fast answer: Commercial trajectory for established fentanyl injections follows milestones tied to:

  • generic entry dates,
  • formulary updates,
  • contract renewals with GPOs,
  • and supply stability.

Milestone types

  • Brand net sales inflection after each major contract cycle.
  • Downward slope after new generic approvals in the same strength and presentation.
  • Potential stabilization when generics consolidate supply or experience shortages.

Market and financial scenario analysis: how net sales typically evolve after generic entry

Fast answer: Once preservative-free generic fentanyl equivalents become available in the relevant strengths, brand revenue typically follows a multistage decline:

  1. gradual erosion during formulary and procurement conversion cycles,
  2. sharper decline after contract awards,
  3. slower decline afterward as remaining brand share stabilizes in accounts that keep it on formulary.

Indicative shape (no brand-specific numbers provided)

  • Pre-generic: stable demand with routine contract-based net price optimization.
  • At generic launch: immediate unit share pressure, with price driven down by the competitive set.
  • Post-launch: net revenue continues to fall as discounts increase and usage shifts.

Key Takeaways

  • Sublimaze Preservative Free’s market dynamics are driven by hospital anesthesia and procedural sedation demand, with formulary and GPO contracting as the main accelerants of share loss.
  • Financial trajectory is typically shaped by generic fentanyl citrate injection availability in equivalent preservative-free presentations and the Orange Book/patent landscape for the specific NDA strengths.
  • The most material commercial risk is generic substitution once patent/exclusivity barriers tied to the brand presentation lapse.
  • Near-term revenue outlook depends on whether any remaining protections apply to the same strengths and packaging that hospitals buy under contracts, because that determines substitution feasibility.

FAQs

  1. How do GPO contracts change the net price trajectory for branded fentanyl injection products?
  2. What Orange Book patent listings most strongly predict whether a preservative-free fentanyl brand faces delayed generic entry?
  3. How quickly do hospitals convert from branded fentanyl to generic fentanyl citrate injection after ANDA approval?
  4. Do preservative-free presentation differences materially slow generic substitution for fentanyl injection?
  5. What settlement terms in fentanyl injection patent cases typically control launch timing and revenue erosion?

References (APA)

No sources were cited because no drug-specific NDA/Orange Book listings, patent numbers, FDA approval milestones, litigation dockets, or financial figures were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.