Last Updated: August 10, 2026

SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Sodium Aminosalicylate, and what generic alternatives are available?

Sodium Aminosalicylate is a drug marketed by Hexcel and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE is aminosalicylate sodium. There are three drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the aminosalicylate sodium profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE?
  • What are the global sales for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE?
Summary for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE
Recent Clinical Trials for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Beijing Chest HospitalN/A

See all SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hexcel SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE aminosalicylate sodium POWDER;ORAL 080097-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration
Last updated: July 9, 2026

Sodium Aminosalicylate Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory (Revenue Outlook, Pricing, Exclusivity, and Competitive Pressure)

Sodium aminosalicylate is a niche gastrointestinal (GI) anti-inflammatory active used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care, with commercial outcomes dominated by patent or regulatory exclusivity status, limited branded competition in key markets, generic substitution, and guideline-driven prescribing. Its financial trajectory is primarily shaped by (1) how quickly FDA approvals convert branded listings into generic density, (2) how strongly payers steer to lowest-cost therapeutics within aminosalicylate classes, and (3) whether brand manufacturers maintain differentiated dosing or formulation IP. Where exclusivity is exhausted, price competition typically compresses unit price and shifts revenue into volume, with margin pressure and volatility from distributor and wholesaler purchasing cycles.

No patent or FDA Orange Book/Biologics data were provided in the prompt for Sodium aminosalicylate. Without those primary identifiers (application numbers, NDA/ANDA references, Orange Book patent lists, exclusivity periods, label and dosage strengths, current manufacturers, and any Paragraph IV events), a complete, accurate, and defensible financial trajectory tied to real-world launch and exclusivity dates cannot be produced.

No market-size, revenue, or launch-timeline claims are included below because they would require verifiable, source-backed drug-specific identifiers and filings.


What is sodium aminosalicylate used for and where does it compete commercially?

Sodium aminosalicylate is positioned in GI indications where aminosalicylates are used to reduce inflammation in IBD, especially ulcerative colitis and other colitis phenotypes depending on local labeling. Commercial competition usually occurs at two levels:

  1. Therapeutic class competition (aminosalicylates)

    • Payers and formularies often bucket aminosalicylate products together and prefer lower acquisition cost.
    • Switching typically follows price, tolerability, and dosing convenience.
  2. Formulation and dosing competition

    • Oral delayed-release vs standard-release and dose frequency change adherence and channel demand.
    • If sodium aminosalicylate’s specific formulation is not uniquely differentiated versus dominant competitors, substitution risk increases as soon as generic approvals and interchangeable pathways are established.

Featured snippet answer: Sodium aminosalicylate competes mainly within the aminosalicylate IBD segment, where payer-driven cost controls and generic substitution determine revenue stability.

Which prescribers and payer segments influence uptake?

  • Gastroenterology is the primary prescriber group.
  • Commercial payers, PBMs, and formularies influence real-world persistence and refill rates via step edits and tiering within IBD drug classes.

What drives real-world demand seasonality and channel behavior?

  • IBD is a chronic condition, but pharmacy fill patterns can shift with patient cohorts and prescriber preference.
  • During heightened generic competition, wholesalers push mix toward the lowest-cost SKU(s), shifting revenue share across NDCs.

How do generic entry and interchangeability risks shape the financial trajectory of sodium aminosalicylate?

In small-molecule chronic therapies, generic entry dynamics typically dominate multi-year revenue. The financial trajectory after generic availability is usually characterized by:

  • Rapid unit price compression after ANDA launches and subsequent 2nd/3rd generic entries.
  • Revenue dilution as channel inventories normalize and prescriber preference shifts to lower-cost alternatives.
  • Margin pressure for any remaining branded or specialty-distributor margins.

For sodium aminosalicylate specifically, whether revenue remains resilient depends on:

  • whether a branded product has intact, unexpired exclusivity across the covered strengths and dosage forms, and
  • whether formulation differences prevent immediate substitution.

Featured snippet answer: Sodium aminosalicylate revenue tends to track the pace of generic approvals and formulary substitution within aminosalicylate class products.


When does sodium aminosalicylate lose exclusivity in the US and what does that imply for revenue?

A correct exclusivity and expiration timeline requires Orange Book identifiers for the relevant NDA/strength/dosage form, including:

  • patent expiration dates for active ingredients and formulations,
  • any pediatric exclusivity,
  • any marketing exclusivity under 180-day/3-year/other frameworks.

No NDA/ANDA numbers, Orange Book patent lists, or FDA exclusivity artifacts were supplied in the prompt, so a precise “lose exclusivity” date cannot be stated without generating unsupported claims.

Featured snippet answer: The exclusivity timeline for sodium aminosalicylate cannot be computed from the prompt because no Orange Book or FDA listing identifiers were provided.


What patent estate protects sodium aminosalicylate formulations and dosing, and how strong is it?

A complete patent landscape for sodium aminosalicylate must be built from:

  • Orange Book-listed patents for any approved US drug product(s),
  • method-of-use patents (IBD indications, dosing regimens),
  • formulation and manufacturing patents (granulation, coating, release profile),
  • any enforcement history (litigation, consent judgments, settlements).

No patent numbers, assignees, or cited filings were provided. A “how strong is the patent estate” score without a listed set of patents and jurisdictions would be noncompliant with the requirement for complete and accurate response.

Featured snippet answer: A sodium aminosalicylate patent strength assessment cannot be produced here because no specific US listings and patent identifiers were included.


What happens financially after a Paragraph IV challenge for sodium aminosalicylate?

Paragraph IV challenges typically matter financially through:

  • triggering 180-day exclusivity for the first filer,
  • enabling earlier entry than later filers if exclusivity or litigation is favorable,
  • settlement terms that can delay or alter entry.

To model “financial trajectory after a Paragraph IV,” the following are required:

  • ANDA application numbers,
  • first-filer status,
  • settlement dates and entry design (if litigated),
  • court dockets and consent judgments.

None were provided in the prompt, so no drug-specific litigation-driven revenue timeline is included.


What is the Orange Book status of sodium aminosalicylate and how many patents are listed?

Orange Book status is determinative for:

  • generic entry barriers in the US,
  • timing of ANDA filings and design-around strategies,
  • risk assessment for revenue modeling.

No Orange Book listing entries (NDA number, dosage form, strength, patent list) were provided in the prompt; therefore, “Orange Book status” and “how many patents are listed” cannot be answered accurately.


How does sodium aminosalicylate compare with competing aminosalicylates on price, access, and formulary placement?

A credible competitive comparison requires:

  • branded vs generic presence per competitor,
  • average net price and trend data,
  • formulary tiering and step edits,
  • segment-specific utilization by delivery system (including delayed-release and MMX-style analogs when applicable).

No competitor list, NDC/NDA mapping, or pricing benchmarks were provided in the prompt, so this section cannot state verified market dynamics.


Which companies sell sodium aminosalicylate and what is the distribution of share across brands and generics?

Market share distribution is buildable only with:

  • current US NDC-level product roster and manufacturer,
  • prescription and/or sales reporting,
  • wholesaler and channel mix.

No sales or NDC listing roster was included, so no company-level market share can be accurately enumerated.


What regulatory milestones and FDA pathways affect sodium aminosalicylate market growth?

FDA-relevant drivers include:

  • approval dates for the currently marketed product(s),
  • any changes in formulation, bioavailability, or labeling,
  • ANDA approvals and any changes to reference products.

No FDA milestones were provided. Without NDA/ANDA numbers, a milestone timeline cannot be constructed.


What generic entry risks exist for sodium aminosalicylate in 2026 and beyond?

Generic entry risks are defined by:

  • patent status (expiry and enforceability),
  • litigation posture,
  • eligibility for labeling carve-outs,
  • availability and reformulation risks for ANDA manufacturers.

No patent expiration or litigation status was provided; therefore, a 2026-and-beyond risk table would require assumptions and is not included.


Key takeaway timeline (data required to model the financial trajectory)

A usable financial trajectory model for sodium aminosalicylate requires the following drug-specific inputs, none included in the prompt:

  • US NDA/ANDA identifiers for the marketed sodium aminosalicylate product(s)
  • Orange Book patent list (compound/formulation/method-of-use)
  • Exclusivity flags (marketing exclusivity, pediatric exclusivity)
  • FDA approval dates and any ANDA first-filer 180-day exclusivity
  • Any litigation docket dates and settlement entry triggers
  • Current competitors and NDC product roster
  • Market pricing baseline and generic price erosion curves by NDC

Key Takeaways

  • Sodium aminosalicylate’s financial trajectory in IBD care is typically governed by payer cost-control pressure and generic substitution timing within the aminosalicylate class.
  • A drug-specific “exclusivity loss date,” “patent estate strength,” and “post-challenge revenue impact” require Orange Book and litigation identifiers not provided in the prompt.
  • Without those identifiers, market dynamics can be described only at a class level, not as a precise, decision-grade forecast.

FAQs

  1. How do PBM formulary rules typically affect sodium aminosalicylate utilization in IBD?
  2. What are the main economic drivers behind price erosion for generic aminosalicylates after first ANDA entry?
  3. How do formulation changes (release profile or dosing frequency) influence substitution risk for sodium aminosalicylate?
  4. What litigation artifacts most strongly change generic launch timing for small-molecule IBD drugs?
  5. Which FDA exclusivity mechanisms most often extend branded revenue for chronic GI therapies in the US?

References (APA)

No source documents were provided in the prompt for Sodium aminosalicylate’s FDA listing, Orange Book status, patent estate, or company sales data; therefore, no citations are included.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.