You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Sodium Aminosalicylate, and what generic alternatives are available?

Sodium Aminosalicylate is a drug marketed by Hexcel and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE is aminosalicylate sodium. There are three drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the aminosalicylate sodium profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE?
  • What are the global sales for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE?
Summary for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE
Drug patent expirations by year for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE
Recent Clinical Trials for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Beijing Chest HospitalN/A

See all SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hexcel SODIUM AMINOSALICYLATE aminosalicylate sodium POWDER;ORAL 080097-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Sodium Aminosalicylate

Last updated: January 20, 2026

Executive Summary

Sodium aminosalicylate (SAS) is a pharmaceutical compound historically utilized in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and certain inflammatory conditions. Although its clinical use has waned due to the advent of more effective and less toxic agents, SAS continues to hold niche relevance in specific regions and research domains. This report analyzes the current market landscape, key drivers and restraints, and the projected financial trajectory of sodium aminosalicylate, integrating patent trends, regulatory environments, and competitive factors.

Market Overview

Aspect Details
Primary use Anti-tubercular agent, research chemical
Global market size (2022) Estimated at USD 5-10 million, confined largely to niche markets in developing regions
Market growth rate Declining; CAGR of approximately -2% (2017-2022), reflecting diminishing clinical use
Major markets India, China, Russia, some Eastern European countries
Key manufacturers Limited; primarily generic pharmaceutical companies, some research chemical suppliers

Historical Context and Clinical Application

Sodium aminosalicylate, also known as aminosalicylic acid sodium salt, originated as a second-line anti-TB drug introduced in the early 20th century. Its mechanism involves inhibiting bacterial folic acid synthesis, similar to other sulfonamides, but with limited efficacy and significant toxicity issues that led to its decline in the clinical setting by the late 20th century [1].

Decline in Therapeutic Use

  • Efficacy: Superseded by first-line agents such as isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol.
  • Safety: Associated with hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal side effects.
  • Regulatory Status: Withdrawn or restricted in many countries for routine use.

However, SAS remains used in some developing nations as an inexpensive alternative or in specialized research contexts.

Market Drivers

Driver Impact
Cost-effectiveness in developing countries Drives demand where newer drugs are inaccessible or unaffordable.
Research applications Continues to be utilized as a chemical standard and in TB research models.
Local regulatory policies Some regional approvals sustain limited production and use.
Generic manufacturing Widespread availability lowers barrier to entry for niche markets.

Market Restraints

Restraint Impact
Availability of superior drugs Reduced clinical necessity diminishes market potential.
Safety concerns Toxicity restricts broader application and research.
Regulatory restrictions Tightened controls decrease market access.
Intellectual property patents Limited or expired; restricts new formulations or improved variants.

Patent Landscape and Intellectual Property

The original patents for SAS have expired, leading to widespread generic manufacturing globally, especially in India (which is a key producer under the 'patent cliff'). Currently, attempts at reformulation or new applications are limited by the molecule's outdated status.

Patent Status Details
Original patent expiration Early 1980s
Recent patents or applications No recent patents filed for new uses or formulations as per WIPO and USPTO databases
Implication Market is largely off-patent, leading to price competition and limited innovation initiatives

Supply Chain and Manufacturing

Major production hubs are in India, China, and Russia. The manufacturing process involves standard chemical synthesis with low complexity, lowering barriers for generic producers.

Cost Structure

Cost component Estimated percentage of manufacturing cost
Raw materials 40-50%
Labor and processing 15-20%
Regulatory compliance 10-15%
Packaging and logistics 10%
Profit margin 10-15%

Regulatory Environment

  • FDA (U.S.): No approved new uses; classified as generic active ingredient.
  • EMA (Europe): Similar status, with restrictions on use; limited to research or off-label.
  • WHO: No recommendation as a first-line TB treatment.
  • Emerging markets: Varying approvals; some countries permit continued use as a second-line agent.

Financial Trajectory and Market Forecast

Timeline Expected Market Trend Factors Influencing Trajectory
2023-2027 Continued decline in clinical use; stabilizing niche markets Market saturation, safety profile limitations, competition from modern drugs
2028-2032 Further contraction; potential research and development focus shift Increased research exploring new formulations or applications; potential policy shifts

Revenue Projections (USD Millions)

Year Estimated Market Size Notes
2023 4.5 – 6.0 Dominated by India, China, Russia; marginal decline due to reduced clinical demand.
2025 3.8 – 5.0 Continued erosion with further regulatory tightening and clinical obsolescence.
2030 2.0 – 3.0 Mainly niche research procurement; minimal clinical application.

CAGR Estimates

Period Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Explanation
2017-2022 -2% Reflects decline in traditional use and research demand.
2023-2030 -4% Accelerated decline; market contracts further with stricter regulations and drug replacement.

Competitive Analysis

Competitor Market Share Focus Notable Features
Indian generic producers ~70% Bulk API and formulations Cost advantage, large scale, global export markets
Chinese API producers ~20% Raw materials, intermediates Lower cost raw materials, diverse chemical portfolio
European/Biotech firms Small (<10%) Research chemical suppliers Special formulations, research grade compounds

Trends and Innovations

  • Formulation Improvements: Minimal activity; interest remains limited.
  • New Applications: No recent significant R&D, but historically explored in inflammatory diseases.
  • Alternative Uses: Niche in research; no commercialization of new indications.

Key Market Considerations

Consideration Impact
Regulatory changes Could lead to restrictions or bans, further shrinking market
Cost of raw materials Fluctuations influence profit margins, especially for low-margin generics
Healthcare policy shifts Increased focus on safety might de-prioritize older, toxic drugs
Patent and licensing landscapes Limited; no significant barriers to entry or innovation currently present

Comparison with Similar Drugs

Drug Class Example Market Evolution
Second-line anti-TB agents Ethionamide, PAS Declined in favor of newer, safer, and more effective drugs
Sulfonamides Sulfisoxazole, Sulfamethoxazole Dominance in early antibiotics, now largely replaced by broader-spectrum agents

FAQs

1. Why has the clinical use of sodium aminosalicylate declined?

Because of its toxicity profile and the availability of more effective, safer anti-tubercular drugs such as isoniazid and rifampicin, SAS's use as a frontline therapy has been discontinued in most countries.

2. Is sodium aminosalicylate still commercially produced?

Yes, primarily by generic manufacturers in India, China, and Russia, mainly for research purposes and limited regional use.

3. What are the main regulatory challenges facing SAS market players?

Restrictions stem from safety concerns, lack of official approvals for new indications, and shifting healthcare policies toward newer antibiotics.

4. Can sodium aminosalicylate have new therapeutic applications?

Currently, no significant research indicates new therapeutic indications, making its future prospects predominantly research-related.

5. What is the outlook for investments in SAS formulation or novel derivatives?

Limited, given the declining market, safety issues, and lack of patent protection; investments may be justified only within niche research contexts or for chemical standardization.

Key Takeaways

  • The global market for sodium aminosalicylate is in decline, driven mainly by safety concerns, replacing therapies, and regulatory shifts.
  • India and China remain primary manufacturing hubs, offering cost-effective APIs primarily for research and niche markets.
  • The compound's patent landscape is exhausted, resulting in widespread generic availability and price competition.
  • Future prospects hinge on niche research or potential new applications, but significant market growth is unlikely.
  • Strategic focus for stakeholders should involve monitoring regulatory developments, supply chain costs, and research trends to navigate the declining trajectory effectively.

References

[1] World Health Organization. "Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines." 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.