You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

SERENTIL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Serentil, and when can generic versions of Serentil launch?

Serentil is a drug marketed by Novartis and is included in three NDAs.

The generic ingredient in SERENTIL is mesoridazine besylate. There are two drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the mesoridazine besylate profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SERENTIL?
  • What are the global sales for SERENTIL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SERENTIL?
Summary for SERENTIL
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 44
Patent Applications: 4,003
DailyMed Link:SERENTIL at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for SERENTIL

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SERENTIL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Novartis SERENTIL mesoridazine besylate CONCENTRATE;ORAL 016997-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis SERENTIL mesoridazine besylate TABLET;ORAL 016774-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis SERENTIL mesoridazine besylate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 016775-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis SERENTIL mesoridazine besylate TABLET;ORAL 016774-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis SERENTIL mesoridazine besylate TABLET;ORAL 016774-004 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Novartis SERENTIL mesoridazine besylate TABLET;ORAL 016774-003 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Pharmaceutical Drug: SERENTIL

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Serentil (meprobamate), historically used as an anxiolytic and muscle relaxant, has experienced fluctuating market presence owing to evolving regulatory standards, emerging therapies, and shifting consumer preferences. This analysis examines the current market landscape, regulatory influences, competitive forces, and financial trajectories relevant to Serentil. It delineates strategic insights essential for stakeholders considering the drug's future positioning.


Historical Context and Regulatory Environment

Developed in the mid-20th century, Serentil gained popularity for its anxiolytic properties. However, subsequent concerns regarding safety profiles—particularly risks of dependence, overdose, and adverse side effects—led to regulatory constraints. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) withdrew Serentil’s approval for some indications in the 1980s, classifying it as a controlled substance under Schedule IV. Globally, regulatory agencies have adopted more restrictive policies on drugs with similar profiles, influencing market access and prescribing practices.

In recent years, tightening regulations regarding benzodiazepine-like drugs and sedative-hypnotics have further diminished Serentil’s market viability. Yet, in specific niche markets, such as regions with limited access to newer pharmacotherapeutics, Serentil’s legacy formulations remain in demand, often circumventing strict regulatory oversight through compounded formulations.


Current Market Dynamics

1. Declining Prescriptions and Market Share

The global anxiolytic and sedative landscape has shifted towards newer agents like benzodiazepines (e.g., diazepam, alprazolam) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). These alternatives surpass Serentil in safety profile, efficacy, and regulatory approval, leading to a steady decline in Serentil prescriptions across developed markets.

2. Niche and Off-Label Uses

In certain emerging markets or rural areas, Serentil persists due to lower costs and limited access to newer medications. Additionally, off-label uses—such as in certain anxiety disorders or muscle spasms—continue in some regions, although evidence and safety data are limited.

3. Generic Availability and Price Competitiveness

The patent landscape favors generics, maintaining low prices in markets with minimal patent enforcement or where the drug has fallen out of patent protection. As a result, generic formulations dominate the market, exerting downward pressure on revenue streams for manufacturers.

4. Competition from Modern Alternatives

The advent of safer, more targeted anxiolytics with better pharmacokinetic profiles has supplanted Serentil’s role in clinical practice. Notably, SSRIs and atypical anxiolytics, with less abuse potential, have led to obsolescence of Serentil in primary care settings.


Financial Trajectory Analysis

1. Revenue Trends

Current revenue from Serentil is significantly diminished compared to peak decades. In developed markets, annual sales are estimated to be below $10 million, mostly derived from niche distribution channels. The revenue trajectory suggests further erosion absent new indications or formulation innovations.

2. Cost Dynamics

Manufacturing costs are likely decreasing, aligned with generic production. However, ongoing expenses include regulatory compliance, adverse event monitoring, and legal liabilities associated with safety concerns. These costs may offset revenue margins.

3. Investment and R&D Considerations

Given the limited therapeutic scope and regulatory hurdles, pharmaceutical companies are generally reticent to invest in R&D for Serentil reformulation or new indications. Resources are typically reallocated to novel compounds with higher market potential.

4. Market Exit or Conversion Strategies

Some manufacturers opt for market withdrawal in mature regions while exploring re-positioning via derivative formulations, compounding, or licensing agreements in underserved markets. The financial outlook for such strategies varies based on regulatory feasibility and market demand.


Legal and Ethical Implications

The safety profile of Serentil has led to regulatory actions, increased liability risks, and ethical obligations for pharmaceutical companies. These factors influence market decisions, cost structures, and the potential for legal claims, impacting overall financial valuation.


Future Outlook and Opportunities

1. Regulatory Reclassification and Declassification Possibilities

Potential re-evaluation by health authorities could reopen some markets if safety concerns are mitigated or if Serentil is repositioned in niche applications with controlled prescriptions.

2. Developing New Formulations or Delivery Systems

Transformations into controlled-release formulations or targeted delivery systems could enhance safety profiles, rendering Serentil more acceptable in select contexts.

3. Market Expansion in Low-Resource Settings

In regions where newer drugs are inaccessible or unaffordable, Serentil could sustain limited demand, especially if generic manufacturing expands or if regulatory barriers are eased.

4. Compounded and Off-Label Markets

Compounding pharmacies could sustain Serentil’s market footprint, albeit with limited legal safeguards, posing financial and ethical challenges.


Key Factors Influencing Future Market Dynamics

  • Regulatory stances on old sedatives and anxiolytics.
  • Competitive landscape with newer, safer drugs.
  • Shifts in prescribing guidelines and clinical practice.
  • Economic factors influencing healthcare budgets, especially in developing regions.
  • Legal liabilities pertaining to adverse effects.

Conclusion

The financial prospects for Serentil largely hinge on regulatory developments, market niche sustainability, and strategic repositioning. Its decline in mainstream markets appears irreversible, barring significant reformulation or reclassification efforts. Stakeholders should weigh the limited revenue potential against potential liabilities and market risks, focusing resources on innovative therapies with higher growth trajectories.


Key Takeaways

  • Market decline: Serentil's global market share is diminishing due to safety concerns and superior alternatives.
  • Niche persistence: Limited demand persists in underserved or low-resource markets, primarily through generics and compounded formulations.
  • Regulatory risk: Stringent control measures impact further market access and revenue streams.
  • Revenue outlook: Continued decline in sales, with possible stabilization in niche markets; potential for minimal, short-term gains.
  • Strategic approach: Companies should consider market exit, licensing, or formulation innovations rather than substantial R&D investments.

FAQs

1. Why has Serentil’s market share declined significantly?
Because of safety concerns, regulatory restrictions, and the availability of safer, more effective anxiolytics like benzodiazepines and SSRIs, leading to decreased prescribing and market access.

2. Are there any ongoing efforts to reformulate or reintroduce Serentil?
Currently, few substantial initiatives exist. Repositioning requires navigating complex regulatory pathways and demonstrating improved safety profiles, which is unlikely given existing data.

3. Which regions still show demand for Serentil?
Demand persists mainly in low-resource settings where newer drugs are unavailable or unaffordable, often supplied through compounding pharmacies or legacy formulations.

4. What are the legal risks associated with continuing Serentil production or use?
Risks include liability for adverse events, regulatory sanctions, and ethical concerns, especially given its safety profile.

5. How should pharmaceutical companies approach the Serentil market moving forward?
Assess the cost-benefit of market withdrawal versus niche exploitation, focusing on legal risks, economic viability, and potential for reformulation or licensing in underserved markets.


References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Safety Information for Serentil. (Accessed 2023).
  2. World Health Organization. Essential Medicines List. (2022).
  3. International Narcotics Control Board. Annual Report. (2021).
  4. MarketResearch.com. Global anxiolytic drugs market analysis. (2022).
  5. Industry reports on generic drug markets and patent expirations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.