You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

SEPTRA Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Septra, and when can generic versions of Septra launch?

Septra is a drug marketed by Monarch Pharms and is included in three NDAs.

The generic ingredient in SEPTRA is sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim. There are twenty-seven drug master file entries for this compound. Forty-seven suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for SEPTRA?
  • What are the global sales for SEPTRA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for SEPTRA?
Summary for SEPTRA
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:3
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 22
Clinical Trials: 23
DailyMed Link:SEPTRA at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for SEPTRA
Recent Clinical Trials for SEPTRA

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Roswell Park Cancer InstitutePhase 4
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Phase 4
Cidara Therapeutics Inc.Phase 3

See all SEPTRA clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for SEPTRA

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Monarch Pharms SEPTRA sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim INJECTABLE;INJECTION 018452-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Monarch Pharms SEPTRA DS sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim TABLET;ORAL 017376-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Monarch Pharms SEPTRA sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim SUSPENSION;ORAL 017598-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Monarch Pharms SEPTRA sulfamethoxazole; trimethoprim TABLET;ORAL 017376-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for SEPTRA

Last updated: February 8, 2026

Overview

SEPTRA (sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim) is an antibiotic combination primarily used to treat urinary tract infections, otitis media, and certain respiratory infections. Originally launched by Roche and later acquired by Pfizer, it has maintained a significant market position due to its clinical efficacy, affordability, and broad-spectrum activity.

Market Scope

As of 2022, the global antibiotic market is valued at approximately $51 billion, with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (TMP/SMX) comprising a notable segment, estimated at $1.8 billion. SEPTRA accounts for a large share of this segment, especially in North America and Europe, driven by increasing bacterial resistance to other antibiotics and favoring established agents.

Market Drivers

  • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): Rising resistance to newer antibiotics enhances demand for older, proven agents like SEPTRA.
  • Prescription Practices: Continued preference in outpatient settings and for uncomplicated infections.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Generic availability and low cost sustain its prescription, especially in developing markets.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Label expansions for indications like pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) treatment in immunocompromised patients bolster its market presence.

Market Constraints

  • Resistance Trends: Growing resistance, notably to TMP/SMX, reduces efficacy in some regions, leading to decreased usage.
  • Safety Concerns: Adverse effects like hypersensitivity reactions and hematologic abnormalities limit use in certain populations.
  • Emerging Alternatives: Novel antibiotics with broader spectra or fewer side effects threaten SEPTRA's market share.
  • Patent Expiry: Original patents have long expired; patent protection is non-existent, leading to price erosion.

Financial Trajectory

  • Historical Revenue: Pfizer’s legacy products, including SEPTRA, accounted for roughly $250 million in 2020. The decline aligns with increasing resistance and market share erosion.
  • Generic Competition: Since patent expiration (~ late 1990s), generic formulators have dominated sales, with prices dropping by over 50% in the past decade.
  • Market Outlook (2023-2028): Modest growth projected at around 2% annually, driven by regional demand in emerging markets and new off-label indications. It is unlikely to see significant revenue growth without formulation or indication expansion.
  • Potential Impact of Repositioning: Limited prospects for high-margin repositioning given established generic status and safety profile. However, incremental growth could occur through combination therapies or new formulations targeting resistant strains.

Pricing and Reimbursement Dynamics

  • Pricing Trends: Average pharmacy acquisition cost in the U.S. is approximately $0.15 per pill, with retail pricing around $0.25. Price erosion continues as generics flood the market.
  • Insurance and Reimbursement: In the U.S., insurance coverage is broad, with most reimbursements covering at least 80% of the drug's cost, supporting steady demand in outpatient settings.
  • International Variations: In low-to-middle-income countries, prices are often lower, and reimbursement policies are less structured. Out-of-pocket costs limit access, constraining growth.

Regulatory and Policy Factors

  • FDA Approvals: Continued approvals for specific indications such as PCP in immunosuppressed patients.
  • Antibiotic Stewardship: Policies emphasizing judicious use may limit prescriptions, impacting sales.
  • Innovation & Research: Lack of significant new development reduces the potential for new market entry or expanded indications.

Competitive Landscape

Competitors Key Features Market Share (Approximate) Strengths Threats
Bactrim (generic) Cost-effective, established use 70% in the U.S. Cost favorability Resistance, safety concerns
Daptomycin, Linezolid Broader spectrum for resistant strains 10% Potent against resistant bacteria Cost, side effect profile
Emerging vaccines Prevention of bacterial infections 5% Reduces need for antibiotics Limited to specific indications

Future Outlook

  • No significant patent or formulation innovations are underway.
  • Growth largely depends on regional adoption and resistance dynamics.
  • Potential for slight increase if used in combination with other agents or for emerging resistant infections.

Key Takeaways

  • SEPTRA remains a low-cost antibiotic with a stable but declining market share.
  • Resistance and safety issues limit expansion.
  • Generic competition exerts downward pressure on prices and revenues.
  • Future growth prospects are limited absent significant repositioning efforts.
  • Regional uptake in emerging markets may offer incremental gains.

FAQs

  1. What factors could revive SEPTRA’s market share?
    Development of new formulations, indication expansions, or reversal of resistance trends.

  2. How does resistance impact SEPTRA usage?
    Increasing bacterial resistance leads to reduced clinical efficacy and decreased prescriptions.

  3. Are there alternative drugs that threaten SEPTRA's position?
    Yes, newer antibiotics with broader spectra or fewer side effects are competitors, especially for resistant infections.

  4. How does patent expiration affect SEPTRA's revenue?
    It allows generic manufacturers to produce cheaper versions, decreasing sales revenue for brand-name products.

  5. What regulatory policies influence SEPTRA's sales?
    Antibiotic stewardship programs, safety guidelines, and approval for additional indications shape market dynamics.

References

[1] GlobalData, "Antibiotics Market Analysis," 2022.
[2] IQVIA, "Worldwide Prescription Data," 2022.
[3] U.S. Food & Drug Administration, "Drug Approval and Labeling," 2022.
[4] MarketsandMarkets, "Antibiotics Market Forecast," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.