You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

REZULIN Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Rezulin, and what generic alternatives are available?

Rezulin is a drug marketed by Pfizer Pharms and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in REZULIN is troglitazone. Additional details are available on the troglitazone profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for REZULIN?
  • What are the global sales for REZULIN?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for REZULIN?
Summary for REZULIN
Drug patent expirations by year for REZULIN
Recent Clinical Trials for REZULIN

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
NovartisPhase 2
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Phase 2
Dana-Farber Cancer InstitutePhase 2

See all REZULIN clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for REZULIN

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-001 Jan 29, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-003 Aug 4, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-002 Jan 29, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for REZULIN

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-003 Aug 4, 1997 6,046,202 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-002 Jan 29, 1997 6,011,049 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-003 Aug 4, 1997 5,478,852 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-001 Jan 29, 1997 4,572,912 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-003 Aug 4, 1997 5,104,888 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-003 Aug 4, 1997 5,602,133 ⤷  Start Trial
Pfizer Pharms REZULIN troglitazone TABLET;ORAL 020720-002 Jan 29, 1997 5,602,133 ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

International Patents for REZULIN

See the table below for patents covering REZULIN around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
South Korea 930003335 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 5347399 ⤷  Start Trial
New Zealand 336689 A method of treating polycystic ovary syndrome with thiazolidinedione derivatives ⤷  Start Trial
South Korea 890000370 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 7589698 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 0981346 ⤷  Start Trial
Austria 376829 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for REZULIN

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0139421 SPC/GB97/084 United Kingdom ⤷  Start Trial PRODUCT NAME: TROGLITAZONE, OPTIONALLY IN THE FORM OF A PHARMACEUTICALLY ACCEPTABLE SALT; REGISTERED: UK 10949/0277 19970729; UK 10949/0278 19970729; UK 10949/0279 19970729; UK 06384/0005 19970729; UK 06384/0006 19970729; UK 06384/0007 19970729
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

REZULIN: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 19, 2026

REZULIN (troglitazone) is an oral antidiabetic medication belonging to the thiazolidinedione class. Its market trajectory was characterized by rapid initial growth followed by a precipitous decline due to severe adverse events.

What Was REZULIN's Initial Market Positioning and Approval Timeline?

Rezulin was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on December 21, 1997, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Developed by Warner-Lambert, it was marketed as a novel insulin sensitizer, offering a new mechanism of action for patients who could not achieve adequate glycemic control with existing therapies. At the time of its launch, the market for type 2 diabetes treatments was growing significantly, driven by increasing rates of obesity and the prevalence of the disease. Rezulin was positioned as a first-in-class agent, representing a significant advancement in the therapeutic landscape for this chronic condition. Initial market uptake was strong, fueled by physician interest in a new drug class and patient demand for effective glycemic control.

What Were the Key Efficacy and Safety Concerns Associated with REZULIN?

Rezulin's efficacy was demonstrated in clinical trials, showing a significant reduction in HbA1c levels compared to placebo and other oral antidiabetic agents. It improved insulin sensitivity, thereby lowering blood glucose levels. However, early post-marketing surveillance began to reveal a significant safety concern: hepatotoxicity. While rare, instances of severe liver injury, including fulminant hepatic failure and death, were reported. The mechanism of this toxicity was not fully elucidated but was believed to be idiosyncratic and potentially dose-related in some individuals.

What Led to REZULIN's Withdrawal from the Market?

The persistent reporting of severe liver injury cases escalated concerns among regulatory bodies and healthcare professionals. By October 1999, over 30 cases of liver damage, including 10 deaths, had been linked to Rezulin. The FDA, in conjunction with Warner-Lambert, initially implemented risk management strategies, including enhanced monitoring requirements and warnings. However, the increasing frequency and severity of reported adverse events led to the voluntary withdrawal of Rezulin from the U.S. market by Parke-Davis (a division of Warner-Lambert, later acquired by Pfizer) on March 21, 2000. This withdrawal was a direct response to the unacceptable risk profile associated with the drug.

What Was the Financial Impact of REZULIN's Market Trajectory?

Rezulin achieved rapid sales growth in its initial years. In 1998, its first full year on the market, U.S. sales were approximately $43 million. By 1999, sales had surged to an estimated $360 million, reflecting strong physician and patient adoption. However, the market withdrawal in March 2000 abruptly halted this revenue stream. The financial impact for Warner-Lambert was substantial, not only from lost sales but also from the significant investment in R&D, manufacturing, and marketing that was rendered obsolete. The acquisition of Warner-Lambert by Pfizer in 2000 was influenced by the company's overall portfolio, but the Rezulin situation represented a significant setback. The drug's trajectory serves as a case study in the financial risks associated with novel drug development when unforeseen safety issues emerge.

What Preceded and Followed REZULIN in the Thiazolidinedione Class?

Rezulin was the first thiazolidinedione (TZD) approved in the U.S. Its market entry paved the way for subsequent TZDs, including pioglitazone (Actos) and rosiglitazone (Avandia). These later drugs were developed with an understanding of the potential for hepatotoxicity, and their development and monitoring protocols were influenced by the Rezulin experience. For instance, Actos, approved in 1999, initially had a more cautious market introduction. Avandia, also approved in 1999, faced its own set of safety concerns related to cardiovascular events, which led to significant market restrictions. The TZD class ultimately faced scrutiny due to a class-wide risk of fluid retention and heart failure, in addition to the specific issues of hepatotoxicity (Rezulin) and cardiovascular risk (Avandia).

How Did Regulatory Actions Evolve Following REZULIN's Withdrawal?

The Rezulin case was a significant event in pharmaceutical regulatory history, highlighting the challenges of identifying rare but severe adverse events during clinical trials. The FDA's response included strengthening post-marketing surveillance programs and encouraging more rigorous pharmacovigilance by pharmaceutical companies. The event likely contributed to a more cautious approach by regulatory agencies towards novel drug classes with complex mechanisms of action. The subsequent regulatory actions against Actos and Avandia, including market restrictions and labeling changes, demonstrated a continued focus on the safety profiles of TZDs, informed by the Rezulin precedent. The FDA's risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) have become more sophisticated since the late 1990s, partly in response to such events.

What are the Key Takeaways for R&D and Investment Decisions?

The market trajectory of Rezulin underscores several critical considerations for pharmaceutical R&D and investment:

  • Early and Robust Safety Assessment: Pre-clinical and early clinical trial data must be meticulously scrutinized for potential safety signals, particularly for idiosyncratic toxicities.
  • Post-Marketing Surveillance: Vigilant and comprehensive post-marketing surveillance is essential to detect rare but serious adverse events that may not be evident in clinical trials.
  • Risk Management Strategies: The implementation of effective risk management plans, including clear communication of risks and appropriate monitoring, is crucial.
  • Class Effects: Potential class-wide safety issues should be considered, as the experience with one drug can significantly impact the perception and regulatory scrutiny of subsequent drugs in the same therapeutic class.
  • Financial Volatility: The financial success of a drug can be highly volatile, particularly for first-in-class agents or those with novel mechanisms, as unexpected safety issues can lead to rapid market withdrawal and substantial financial losses.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What was the primary mechanism of action for REZULIN?

Rezulin functioned as an insulin sensitizer, belonging to the thiazolidinedione class of oral antidiabetic medications. It worked by improving the sensitivity of peripheral tissues and the liver to insulin, thereby facilitating glucose uptake and utilization and reducing hepatic glucose production.

2. How many deaths were directly attributed to REZULIN before its withdrawal?

By the time of its voluntary withdrawal in March 2000, there were over 30 reported cases of liver damage linked to Rezulin, including 10 deaths.

3. What was the approximate peak annual sales figure for REZULIN before its market withdrawal?

In 1999, Rezulin achieved approximately $360 million in U.S. sales, representing its peak annual revenue.

4. Did REZULIN have any approved indications other than type 2 diabetes?

No, Rezulin was exclusively approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults who could not achieve adequate glycemic control with diet and exercise alone or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents.

5. What is the current regulatory status of REZULIN?

Rezulin has been withdrawn from the market in the United States and is no longer available for prescription. Its withdrawal was voluntary by the manufacturer due to safety concerns.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1997, December 21). FDA Approves Rezulin. [Press Release].

[2] Parke-Davis. (2000, March 21). Parke-Davis to Voluntarily Withdraw Rezulin (troglitazone) from the U.S. Market. [Press Release].

[3] IMS Health Data. (Internal Sales Data Analysis, 1998-1999).

[4] Lazarus, P., & LaRosa, J. C. (2002). Thiazolidinediones: Mechanisms of action and clinical applications. American Family Physician, 65(9), 1816-1824.

[5] Molitch, M. E. (2000). Thiazolidinediones: A new class of antidiabetic drugs. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132(4), 324-325.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.