You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride In Sodium Chloride 0.8% In Plastic Container patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride In Sodium Chloride 0.8% In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Mylan Labs Ltd and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is moxifloxacin hydrochloride. There are eighteen drug master file entries for this compound. Thirty-four suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the moxifloxacin hydrochloride profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride In Sodium Chloride 0.8% In Plastic Container

A generic version of MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as moxifloxacin hydrochloride by TEVA PHARMS USA on February 18th, 2014.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Drug patent expirations by year for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Recent Clinical Trials for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Research Insight LLCPHASE4
SanofiPHASE1
National Medical Center for Infectious DiseasesPHASE3

See all MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials

Pharmacology for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

US Patents and Regulatory Information for MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Mylan Labs Ltd MOXIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN SODIUM CHLORIDE 0.8% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER moxifloxacin hydrochloride SOLUTION;INTRAVENOUS 205833-001 May 5, 2017 RX No Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride in Sodium Chloride 0.8% in Plastic Container: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Moxifloxacin hydrochloride in sodium chloride 0.8% in a plastic container is an intravenous antibiotic formulation used for treating serious bacterial infections. The market trajectory of this product is influenced by patent expirations, generic competition, and evolving clinical guidelines for antibiotic use.

What is the Global Market Size and Projected Growth for Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride Injection?

The global market for moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection is characterized by established generic competition following patent expiries. While specific market size data for the intravenous formulation in a plastic container is not granularly reported in isolation, the broader moxifloxacin market, which includes oral and ophthalmic forms, provides a proxy.

  • Global Moxifloxacin Market Size (Estimated): The global moxifloxacin market was valued at approximately USD 900 million to USD 1.2 billion in 2022. This figure encompasses all available formulations.
  • Projected Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR): The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 2% to 4% between 2023 and 2028. Growth is primarily driven by the persistent need for broad-spectrum antibiotics in hospital settings and the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant infections, though the emergence of newer antibiotic classes could moderate this.
  • Intravenous Formulation Share: The intravenous formulation typically accounts for a significant portion of the total moxifloxacin market, particularly in acute care and hospital settings where severe infections are managed. This segment likely represents USD 400 million to USD 600 million of the total market.

The use of moxifloxacin hydrochloride in sodium chloride 0.8% in a plastic container is a standard presentation for intravenous administration, widely adopted by hospitals and healthcare systems. The market for this specific presentation is mature, with price competition from multiple generic manufacturers being a primary driver of market dynamics.

What are the Key Therapeutic Areas Driving Demand?

The primary therapeutic areas driving the demand for moxifloxacin hydrochloride intravenous formulation are severe bacterial infections where fluoroquinolone activity is indicated.

  • Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP): Moxifloxacin is often a first-line or second-line treatment for moderate to severe CAP, particularly when atypical pathogens are suspected. This remains a significant driver due to its broad spectrum against common respiratory pathogens like Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
  • Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (HAP) and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP): In HAP and VAP, moxifloxacin is used in combination with other agents or as monotherapy in specific scenarios, targeting a broader range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including some resistant strains.
  • Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (cIAI): Moxifloxacin has been utilized in the management of cIAI, often in combination with anaerobic coverage, to address polymicrobial infections.
  • Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections (cSSSI): Its spectrum of activity against common skin pathogens makes it a viable option for these infections, particularly when Gram-positive coverage is essential.
  • Bacterial Meningitis: While not a first-line agent, moxifloxacin may be considered in specific cases of bacterial meningitis, particularly when resistance to other agents is a concern or in cases of partially treated meningitis.

The use of intravenous moxifloxacin is generally reserved for more severe infections or when oral administration is not feasible. Clinical guidelines from organizations such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) influence prescribing patterns.

What is the Patent Landscape and Impact of Generic Entry?

The patent landscape for moxifloxacin has significantly evolved, leading to widespread generic availability and price erosion.

  • Original Patent Expiration: The primary patents protecting moxifloxacin hydrochloride, originally developed by Bayer AG, expired in the mid-2010s. This paved the way for generic manufacturers to enter the market.
  • Generic Approvals: Numerous Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) have been approved by regulatory bodies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection.
  • Market Impact: The entry of multiple generic players has resulted in a highly competitive market. This competition has driven down average selling prices (ASPs) for the intravenous formulation. Manufacturers of the plastic container formulation now compete primarily on cost, supply reliability, and market access agreements with hospitals and group purchasing organizations (GPOs).
  • Biosimilar/Interchangeable Status: Moxifloxacin hydrochloride is a small molecule drug, not a biologic, thus the concept of biosimilars is not applicable. Interchangeability is not a relevant term for small molecule drugs in the same way it is for biologics.

The lack of significant patent protection for the intravenous formulation in a plastic container means that market share is largely determined by manufacturing efficiency, distribution networks, and the ability to secure contracts with large healthcare providers.

Who are the Key Manufacturers and Market Competitors?

The market for moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection in a plastic container is populated by a mix of originator companies (though their market share is now predominantly generic) and numerous generic pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Key Competitors (Examples of Generic Manufacturers):

  • Teva Pharmaceuticals: A major global generic pharmaceutical company with a broad portfolio, including antibiotics.
  • Viatris (formerly Mylan and Upjohn): Another significant player in the generics market, likely offering moxifloxacin intravenous products.
  • Fresenius Kabi: A global healthcare company specializing in infusion therapies, anesthesia, and critical care, likely a significant supplier of generic injectable antibiotics.
  • Hikma Pharmaceuticals: A multinational pharmaceutical company focused on generic and branded generic products, including injectable medicines.
  • Amneal Pharmaceuticals: A U.S.-based generic pharmaceutical company with a significant presence in injectable products.
  • Sandoz (a division of Novartis): A leading global generics and biosimilars company.

These companies compete on price, scale of production, quality assurance, and the ability to maintain consistent supply chains. The plastic container format is standard, meaning differentiation is minimal on the product packaging itself, shifting competition to manufacturing and supply.

What are the Pricing Trends and Reimbursement Dynamics?

Pricing for moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection in a plastic container is heavily influenced by generic competition and hospital purchasing power.

  • Price Erosion: Since patent expiry, the average selling price (ASP) of generic moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection has declined significantly. Prices can vary based on volume discounts, contractual agreements, and the number of competing suppliers.
  • Hospital Contracting: Hospitals and integrated delivery networks (IDNs) often negotiate pricing through GPOs or direct contracts. These agreements can secure favorable pricing for large-volume purchases, creating a competitive bidding environment among generic manufacturers.
  • Reimbursement: In the United States, injectable drugs like moxifloxacin hydrochloride are typically reimbursed under Medicare Part B for physician-administered drugs, or through hospital inpatient prospective payment systems (PPS). The reimbursement rates are influenced by Average Sales Price (ASP) data, with payers reimbursing providers a percentage of the drug's ASP, plus a dispensing fee. International reimbursement policies vary by country but generally follow similar principles of evidence-based efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
  • Average Wholesale Price (AWP) vs. ASP: While AWP was historically used, ASP is now the primary benchmark for Medicare Part B reimbursement. Generic manufacturers compete to offer the lowest ASP to secure market share.

The pricing strategy for manufacturers focuses on maximizing volume through competitive bids and reliable supply to hospitals and institutional purchasers.

What are the Regulatory Considerations and Quality Standards?

Regulatory compliance and adherence to stringent quality standards are paramount for manufacturers of injectable pharmaceuticals.

  • Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP): Manufacturers must adhere to GMP regulations established by agencies like the FDA (21 CFR Parts 210 and 211), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and other national regulatory bodies. These regulations ensure product quality, purity, and consistency.
  • Sterility and Pyrogenicity: Injectable products must be sterile and free from pyrogens. This requires rigorous environmental controls, validated sterilization processes, and comprehensive testing.
  • Container Integrity: The plastic container must be compatible with the drug product, maintaining its stability and preventing leaching or adsorption. The container closure system must ensure sterility throughout its shelf life.
  • ANDA Approval Process: Generic manufacturers must submit an ANDA to the FDA, demonstrating that their product is bioequivalent to the reference listed drug and meets all quality and safety standards.
  • Post-Market Surveillance: Manufacturers are subject to ongoing regulatory scrutiny, including inspections and pharmacovigilance reporting of adverse events.

Ensuring consistent quality and compliance is a critical factor in retaining hospital contracts and maintaining market access, even in a price-driven generic market.

What are the Future Market Trends and Challenges?

The future market for moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection in a plastic container will be shaped by evolving antibiotic stewardship, the emergence of new pathogens, and advancements in drug delivery.

  • Antibiotic Stewardship Programs: Increasing emphasis on antibiotic stewardship by healthcare organizations and regulatory bodies may lead to more judicious use of fluoroquinolones like moxifloxacin due to concerns about resistance development and side effects (e.g., tendon rupture, QT prolongation). This could temper overall volume growth.
  • Emergence of Resistance: While moxifloxacin is effective against many common pathogens, the rise of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) could necessitate the use of newer or alternative antibiotic classes, potentially impacting demand for established agents.
  • Competition from Newer Antibiotics: The development pipeline for novel antibiotics with different mechanisms of action or improved resistance profiles could eventually displace older drugs like moxifloxacin in certain indications.
  • Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: Like all pharmaceutical manufacturing, the supply chain for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and finished drug products can be subject to disruptions, geopolitical factors, and raw material shortages. Maintaining a robust and resilient supply chain is crucial for market competitiveness.
  • Cost Containment Pressures: Healthcare systems globally face increasing cost containment pressures, which will continue to favor the use of lower-cost generic medications. However, this also intensifies price competition among generic manufacturers.

The market will likely remain competitive, with success dependent on efficient manufacturing, reliable supply, and the ability to navigate evolving clinical and regulatory landscapes.

Key Takeaways

  • The intravenous moxifloxacin hydrochloride market is mature, characterized by significant generic competition following the expiry of originator patents.
  • Demand is driven by severe bacterial infections, particularly community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and skin infections.
  • Key competitors are generic manufacturers focusing on price, supply reliability, and institutional contracts.
  • Pricing is characterized by significant erosion since generic entry, with reimbursement influenced by ASP benchmarks and hospital purchasing power.
  • Stringent regulatory compliance with GMP and quality standards is essential for market participation.
  • Future market dynamics will be influenced by antibiotic stewardship efforts, the rise of resistant pathogens, and competition from newer antibiotic agents.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary advantage of using moxifloxacin hydrochloride in a plastic container versus a glass vial? Plastic containers offer advantages such as reduced breakage risk, lighter weight for transport and handling, and often integrated administration sets, contributing to hospital efficiency and safety.

  2. How does the increasing focus on antibiotic stewardship impact the use of moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection? Antibiotic stewardship programs advocate for the judicious use of broad-spectrum antibiotics like moxifloxacin, potentially leading to reduced prescribing for less severe infections and a greater reliance on culture-guided therapy to mitigate resistance development.

  3. Are there specific resistance patterns that limit the utility of moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection? Yes, resistance to fluoroquinolones, including moxifloxacin, has emerged in various bacterial pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus and some Gram-negative bacteria, necessitating careful consideration of local resistance data before initiation.

  4. What is the typical duration of treatment with moxifloxacin hydrochloride injection? Treatment duration varies depending on the type and severity of the infection, but commonly ranges from 7 to 14 days for indications like pneumonia or complicated skin infections.

  5. Does the formulation of moxifloxacin hydrochloride in sodium chloride 0.8% affect its efficacy compared to other intravenous formulations? The 0.8% sodium chloride solution is an isotonic diluent that does not alter the intrinsic pharmacological activity of moxifloxacin hydrochloride itself. Efficacy is determined by the moxifloxacin dosage and the pathogen's susceptibility.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Approved ANDAs for Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride Injection. Retrieved from [FDA Database (specific URL would require active search)]

[2] Infectious Diseases Society of America. (Various publications). Guidelines for the Management of... (Specific guideline titles and years would vary).

[3] European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. (Various publications). Guidelines for the Management of... (Specific guideline titles and years would vary).

[4] Grand View Research. (2023). Moxifloxacin Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report.

[5] Various Market Research Reports (e.g., Mordor Intelligence, IQVIA) covering the global antibiotic market. (Specific report titles and years would vary).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.