MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE Drug Patent Profile
When do Midozalam Hydrochloride patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?
Midozalam Hydrochloride is a drug marketed by Onesource Specialty and is included in one NDA.
The generic ingredient in MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE is midazolam hydrochloride. There is one drug master file entry for this compound. Twenty-one suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the midazolam hydrochloride profile page.
DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Midozalam Hydrochloride
A generic version of MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE was approved as midazolam hydrochloride by FRESENIUS KABI USA on June 20th, 2000.
AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
- What is the 5 year forecast for MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE?
- What are the global sales for MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE?
- What is Average Wholesale Price for MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE?
Summary for MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE
| US Patents: | 0 |
| Applicants: | 1 |
| NDAs: | 1 |
| Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: | 2 |
| Patent Applications: | 1,900 |
| DailyMed Link: | MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE at DailyMed |
Pharmacology for MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE
| Drug Class | Benzodiazepine |
US Patents and Regulatory Information for MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Exclusivity Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Onesource Specialty | MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE | midazolam hydrochloride | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 090316-001 | May 4, 2011 | AP | RX | No | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Onesource Specialty | MIDOZALAM HYDROCHLORIDE | midazolam hydrochloride | INJECTABLE;INJECTION | 090316-002 | May 4, 2011 | AP | RX | No | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Exclusivity Expiration |
Midazolam Hydrochloride Market Dynamics, Patent Status, Competition, and Financial Trajectory
Midazolam hydrochloride is a mature, off-patent benzodiazepine used for procedural sedation, anesthesia induction, intensive-care sedation, and seizure treatment. Its commercial market is driven by hospital volume, injectable supply reliability, government procurement, and manufacturing cost rather than exclusivity. U.S. revenue is fragmented among generic manufacturers, and major producers generally do not report midazolam sales separately. Patent barriers are minimal, biosimilar risk is irrelevant, and future growth depends on procedure volumes, hospital purchasing, shortages, and expansion in emerging markets.
What is midazolam hydrochloride and how is it used?
Midazolam hydrochloride is the water-soluble hydrochloride salt of midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine. It is marketed primarily as an injectable solution, with oral and intranasal dosage forms also available in some markets.
| Attribute | Midazolam hydrochloride |
|---|---|
| Drug class | Benzodiazepine |
| Primary mechanisms | GABA-A receptor positive allosteric modulation |
| U.S. brand | Versed |
| Main dosage forms | Injectable solution, oral syrup, intranasal products in selected markets |
| Principal uses | Procedural sedation, anesthesia, ICU sedation, seizure control |
| Controlled-substance status | U.S. Schedule IV |
| Reference U.S. approval | Versed injection, FDA-approved in the 1980s |
| Biosimilar pathway | Not applicable |
| Current market structure | Generic and institutional purchasing market |
Midazolam has a rapid onset and relatively short duration compared with many older benzodiazepines. Hospitals use it in endoscopy, emergency medicine, interventional radiology, surgery, dentistry, intensive care, and pediatric procedures. Its injectable form is the largest commercial segment in institutional care.
The product is typically supplied in concentrations including 1 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL. Common presentations include single-dose vials, ampules, and ready-to-use or pharmacy-prepared formats. Product availability varies by manufacturer and country.
When did midazolam hydrochloride lose exclusivity?
Midazolam hydrochloride lost meaningful U.S. market exclusivity decades ago. The original Versed product was introduced in the 1980s, and generic injectable products have competed for many years.
The relevant commercial conclusion is direct: midazolam hydrochloride is a mature generic medicine with no remaining originator exclusivity that controls routine hospital use.
| Exclusivity category | Current position |
|---|---|
| New chemical entity exclusivity | Expired |
| Original product patent protection | Expired |
| U.S. generic competition | Established |
| Pediatric exclusivity | No current commercial significance |
| Orphan exclusivity | Not the basis of the principal market |
| Biosimilar exclusivity | Not applicable |
| Current market barrier | Manufacturing, quality, supply, contracting, and regulatory compliance |
The original brand, Versed, does not control the market in the way that a recently approved small-molecule product would. Hospitals generally purchase generic midazolam through group purchasing organizations, distributors, direct contracts, or government tenders.
What patents protect midazolam hydrochloride?
No active composition-of-matter patent is commercially relevant to standard midazolam hydrochloride supply in the United States. The core molecule, its hydrochloride salt, and conventional injectable use are long-established.
What formulation patents cover midazolam?
Formulation and delivery patents can arise around specific products rather than the active ingredient itself. Potentially relevant areas include:
- Intranasal delivery systems
- Buccal or transmucosal formulations
- Pediatric dosing systems
- Ready-to-administer presentations
- Stabilization and packaging
- Device-based delivery
- Combination products for seizure rescue
These rights do not generally create a barrier to conventional midazolam hydrochloride injection. A company commercializing an intranasal product may have a more defensible formulation and device position than a supplier selling standard injectable vials.
The strongest modern intellectual-property positions are associated with differentiated delivery products rather than the basic injectable salt. For example, branded seizure-rescue products may rely on device, formulation, method-of-use, or combination claims. Those rights are product-specific and should not be treated as blocking patents against generic midazolam injection.
What method-of-use patents cover midazolam?
Method-of-use patents may cover specific clinical settings, administration routes, dosing schedules, or patient populations. Their commercial value is limited when the drug is already widely used off patent and treatment protocols are difficult to police.
A method-of-use patent could affect a branded rescue product or a narrow indication. It does not normally prevent hospitals from purchasing generic midazolam for anesthesia or procedural sedation.
What is the Orange Book status of midazolam hydrochloride?
The U.S. Orange Book lists approved drug products and patent information submitted by sponsors. Midazolam injection is an established generic category with multiple approved abbreviated new drug applications. The core injectable market is not protected by a live originator patent estate that prevents generic substitution.
Relevant regulatory records include:
- FDA Orange Book listings for midazolam injection and other approved dosage forms
- FDA Drugs@FDA records for Versed and related products
- FDA-approved generic labels
- National Drug Code listings for individual suppliers
Orange Book status must be assessed at the product level because patents can attach to a specific formulation, device, or method of use. A generic vial of midazolam hydrochloride should be evaluated separately from branded nasal or rescue products.
Are there Paragraph IV challenges to midazolam hydrochloride?
Paragraph IV litigation is not a central market issue for standard midazolam hydrochloride injection. The product has been generic for many years, and the main commercial competition is among approved suppliers rather than between a single originator and a new generic entrant.
A Paragraph IV filing can still arise for a newer midazolam formulation, delivery system, or combination product. That scenario differs from the established injectable market:
| Product type | Paragraph IV relevance |
|---|---|
| Conventional injectable midazolam | Low |
| Oral syrup | Low |
| Intranasal rescue product | Potentially material |
| Device-enabled rescue product | Potentially material |
| New combination or pediatric delivery system | Product-specific |
The absence of meaningful current Paragraph IV activity for the conventional injection reflects the age of the molecule and the depth of generic competition.
Which companies compete in the midazolam hydrochloride market?
The U.S. injectable market includes generic manufacturers and branded hospital suppliers. Companies with midazolam products or historical participation have included Pfizer and Hospira, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Fresenius Kabi, Sagent Pharmaceuticals, and other regional suppliers. Availability changes as manufacturers discontinue presentations, transfer approvals, or adjust production.
Competition is based on:
- Approved manufacturing capacity
- Sterile injectable reliability
- Contract pricing
- Vial and concentration availability
- Regulatory inspection history
- Distribution coverage
- Shortage performance
- Hospital formulary acceptance
The supplier landscape is more concentrated than the number of product labels suggests. Sterile injectables require specialized facilities, validated aseptic processes, container-closure controls, and reliable active pharmaceutical ingredient supply. Those requirements create operational barriers even when patent barriers are absent.
How does midazolam compare with competing sedatives?
| Drug | Main competitive role | Commercial position |
|---|---|---|
| Midazolam | Short procedural sedation and seizure rescue | Mature generic, broad institutional use |
| Lorazepam | Anxiety, seizures, ICU and emergency use | Generic, longer duration |
| Diazepam | Seizures, muscle spasm, anxiety | Generic, broader legacy use |
| Propofol | Anesthesia and deep sedation | High-volume injectable competitor |
| Dexmedetomidine | ICU and procedural sedation | Differentiated hospital product, historically higher pricing |
| Ketamine | Anesthesia, analgesia, sedation | Generic, distinct pharmacology |
| Etomidate | Induction of anesthesia | Niche injectable |
| Remimazolam | Procedural sedation and anesthesia | Newer branded or limited-competition category in some markets |
Midazolam retains demand because of its speed, familiarity, broad clinical use, and low generic acquisition cost. Propofol competes strongly in anesthesia and deep sedation. Dexmedetomidine competes in ICU sedation, where its clinical profile and monitoring requirements differ. Remimazolam can compete in procedural sedation and anesthesia but has not displaced the established generic market.
What is the FDA regulatory status of midazolam hydrochloride?
Midazolam hydrochloride is FDA-approved in several dosage forms and indications. The injectable product is labeled for:
- Preoperative sedation and relief of anxiety
- Sedation before diagnostic or therapeutic procedures
- Induction of general anesthesia
- Continuous infusion for ICU sedation in selected settings
The FDA label includes boxed warnings concerning respiratory depression, respiratory arrest, airway obstruction, and the need for appropriate monitoring and resuscitation capability. These warnings affect hospital protocols and purchasing decisions but do not materially reduce the drug’s entrenched use.
Midazolam is a controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act. DEA Schedule IV status creates compliance obligations for manufacturing, distribution, inventory, recordkeeping, and dispensing. It is a regulatory burden, not a market-exclusivity mechanism.
What supply-chain risks affect midazolam hydrochloride?
The main supply risk is sterile injectable manufacturing. Shortages can result from:
- Facility shutdowns or remediation
- Quality-control failures
- Component shortages
- Active ingredient constraints
- Manufacturing prioritization
- Demand spikes during respiratory outbreaks or mass-casualty events
- Limited capacity for specific vial sizes or concentrations
The FDA Drug Shortages database has recorded periods in which injectable midazolam availability was constrained. Hospital buyers often respond by qualifying multiple suppliers, adjusting concentration preferences, and using alternative sedatives.
Supply disruptions can temporarily improve manufacturer pricing, but they do not create durable pricing power unless a supplier controls a scarce presentation or has limited competition. Once supply normalizes, institutional purchasing pressure generally returns.
How strong is the patent estate for midazolam hydrochloride?
The patent estate is weak for conventional midazolam hydrochloride injection and stronger only for selected delivery innovations.
| Patent factor | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Core molecule | Expired |
| Hydrochloride salt | No meaningful current blocking position |
| Standard injectable formulation | Weak patent protection |
| Intranasal delivery | Potentially stronger, product-specific |
| Device integration | Potentially stronger |
| New rescue indication | Narrow method-of-use value |
| Manufacturing know-how | Commercially relevant but difficult to value publicly |
| Regulatory exclusivity | Limited for established generic products |
Manufacturing know-how can still provide a competitive advantage. Sterile injectable production depends on process validation, environmental controls, fill-finish expertise, container compatibility, and consistent batch release. These capabilities are not equivalent to patent exclusivity, but they can limit the number of dependable suppliers.
What generic launch risks exist for midazolam hydrochloride?
For standard injectable midazolam, generic launch risk is low from an intellectual-property perspective and moderate from an execution perspective.
A new entrant must manage:
- ANDA approval and bioequivalence requirements
- Controlled-substance registration
- Sterile manufacturing validation
- Commercial-scale fill-finish capacity
- Approved vial configurations
- FDA inspection readiness
- Distributor and group-purchasing contracts
- Low-margin pricing
- Potential shortage-driven demand volatility
The principal risk is that additional approval does not translate into sustainable share. Mature injectable markets can have low net prices and high customer concentration. Hospitals may keep a supplier as a secondary source rather than switch their primary contract.
What would a generic launch scenario look like?
| Scenario | Likely market effect |
|---|---|
| New supplier enters during normal supply | Price pressure and limited share capture |
| New supplier enters during shortage | Faster adoption and stronger contracting opportunity |
| Supplier adds an unavailable concentration | Higher probability of hospital uptake |
| Supplier offers ready-to-use format | Potential premium versus standard vials |
| Supplier has a quality event | Rapid loss of share and regulatory exposure |
| Brand launches differentiated delivery product | Segmented competition, not direct replacement of all injection volume |
What is the financial trajectory for midazolam hydrochloride?
Midazolam hydrochloride has a mature, low-growth financial profile in standard injectable form. Revenue is distributed across many suppliers, and public companies generally combine midazolam sales with broader injectable, hospital, or generic portfolios.
Revenue drivers
The market’s financial trajectory is shaped by:
- Procedure volumes
- Hospital admissions
- Endoscopy and ambulatory surgery activity
- ICU utilization
- Seizure-rescue demand
- Generic price erosion
- Shortage-related price increases
- Geographic expansion
- Product mix by concentration and presentation
- Branded delivery-system innovation
Base demand is relatively stable because midazolam is embedded in hospital protocols. Revenue growth from unit expansion is usually modest. Price increases can occur during shortages, but generic competition limits the durability of those gains.
Margin profile
Standard injectable midazolam is generally a low- to moderate-margin generic product. Gross margins depend on:
- Active ingredient cost
- Sterile fill-finish utilization
- Packaging and container costs
- Contract price
- Government tender exposure
- Freight and inventory requirements
- Quality remediation costs
A supplier with underutilized sterile capacity may accept aggressive pricing to improve facility utilization. A supplier with scarce capacity or a shortage-available presentation may achieve better pricing.
Branded rescue products create a separate financial segment
Intranasal and other user-friendly rescue formulations can support materially higher prices than conventional injectable midazolam. Their economics depend on:
- Device ownership
- Formulation patents
- Pediatric and caregiver usability
- Emergency medical positioning
- Reimbursement
- Pharmacy distribution
- Competing diazepam and other seizure-rescue products
This segment is commercially distinct from hospital injection sales. A branded nasal product can generate higher revenue per dose but faces reimbursement, formulary, patient-access, and patent risks that do not apply to a basic generic vial.
What licensing deals affect midazolam hydrochloride?
Licensing activity is more likely in differentiated delivery systems than in standard injectable midazolam. Potential deal structures include:
- Regional rights for intranasal products
- Technology licenses for drug-device systems
- Contract manufacturing agreements
- Distribution partnerships
- Co-development of pediatric rescue products
- In-licensing of seizure-treatment formulations
The conventional injectable market generally does not require a licensing strategy because manufacturers can rely on established active ingredient and formulation technology. Commercial partnerships are more relevant where a company lacks sterile capacity, a delivery device, regulatory infrastructure, or regional distribution.
What patent litigation affects midazolam hydrochloride?
There is no central, ongoing patent dispute that defines the conventional U.S. midazolam hydrochloride injection market. Litigation exposure is more likely to arise from:
- Branded intranasal products
- Device patents
- Formulation patents
- Method-of-use claims
- ANDA litigation involving a newer product
- Product liability claims related to respiratory depression or administration errors
Patent litigation involving a branded midazolam delivery product should not be generalized to the established injectable market. The legal and commercial risk profiles are different.
What geographic markets offer growth potential?
North America and Western Europe are mature markets with stable institutional demand and strong generic price competition. Growth opportunities are more likely in:
- Asia-Pacific hospital systems
- Latin American surgical markets
- Middle Eastern healthcare expansion
- Private hospitals in emerging economies
- Ambulance and emergency-care networks
- Pediatric and seizure-rescue channels
Geographic expansion requires compliance with local controlled-substance rules, registration requirements, tender systems, pharmacopoeial standards, and import controls. In many markets, the competitive advantage is dependable supply rather than patent ownership.
What is the generic and commercial outlook for midazolam hydrochloride?
The commercial outlook is stable for standard injectable use and more attractive for differentiated delivery products.
| Period | Expected market direction |
|---|---|
| Near term | Stable hospital demand, periodic shortage-driven volatility |
| Medium term | Continued generic price pressure and supplier consolidation |
| Longer term | Limited growth in injection volume; selective expansion in rescue delivery systems |
| Patent risk | Low for conventional injection |
| Regulatory risk | Moderate because of controlled-substance and sterile-manufacturing requirements |
| Financial upside | Limited for commodity injection; higher for branded delivery platforms |
The strongest investment case is not a new patent on the old molecule. It is a reliable sterile manufacturing platform, a differentiated delivery system, or a product that solves access and administration problems in seizure rescue and procedural care.
Key Takeaways
- Midazolam hydrochloride is a mature, off-patent benzodiazepine with extensive generic competition.
- The conventional injectable market has no meaningful originator exclusivity.
- Paragraph IV risk is low for standard injection but can matter for newer nasal, device-enabled, or combination products.
- No biosimilar pathway applies because midazolam is a small-molecule drug.
- Sterile manufacturing capacity, FDA compliance, and supply reliability are more important than patents.
- Hospital demand is stable, while generic price erosion limits long-term revenue growth.
- Intranasal and other differentiated delivery systems offer greater pricing potential than standard vials.
- Public manufacturers generally do not disclose standalone midazolam revenue.
- Shortages can temporarily improve pricing and market share for reliable suppliers.
- The market’s long-term financial profile is stable for injection and selectively growth-oriented for proprietary rescue formulations.
FAQs About Midazolam Hydrochloride Market and Patent Risk
Is midazolam hydrochloride still under patent?
The core midazolam hydrochloride molecule and conventional injectable formulation are not under commercially meaningful U.S. patent exclusivity. Product-specific patents may apply to newer delivery systems.
Can a generic company launch midazolam injection without a license from the original manufacturer?
Yes. Approved generic manufacturers can market standard midazolam injection without licensing the original Versed manufacturer, subject to FDA approval, controlled-substance compliance, and manufacturing requirements.
Is midazolam hydrochloride a biologic or biosimilar product?
No. Midazolam hydrochloride is a chemically synthesized small-molecule drug. Generic-drug rules apply rather than the FDA biosimilar pathway.
Why can midazolam prices rise despite expired patents?
Prices can increase during sterile-injectable shortages, supplier withdrawals, production interruptions, or demand spikes. Those increases reflect supply conditions rather than patent protection.
Which midazolam products have the highest commercial differentiation?
Intranasal, buccal, pediatric, and device-enabled rescue products have greater differentiation than standard injectable vials. Their value depends on delivery convenience, clinical setting, reimbursement, and any surviving formulation or device rights.
References
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/orange-book
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Midazolam injection prescribing information. FDA-approved product labeling.
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Drug shortages database. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/drugshortages/
-
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (2024). Drug scheduling. https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-scheduling
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). National Drug Code directory. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ndc/
More… ↓

