You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 6, 2025

MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Magnesium Sulfate In Plastic Container patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Magnesium Sulfate In Plastic Container is a drug marketed by Amneal, Baxter Hlthcare Corp, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Gland, Hospira, Hq Spclt Pharma, Milla Pharms, and Mylan Labs Ltd. and is included in eight NDAs.

The generic ingredient in MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER is magnesium sulfate. There are one hundred and forty-six drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the magnesium sulfate profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Magnesium Sulfate In Plastic Container

A generic version of MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER was approved as magnesium sulfate by FRESENIUS KABI USA on September 8th, 1986.

  Get Started Free

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What are the global sales for MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER?
Summary for MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Drug patent expirations by year for MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Recent Clinical Trials for MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of OklahomaEarly Phase 1
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.Phase 3
Cairo UniversityPhase 1/Phase 2

See all MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Amneal MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER magnesium sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 216597-001 Feb 15, 2023 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Hq Spclt Pharma MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER magnesium sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 207350-001 Dec 6, 2017 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Milla Pharms MAGNESIUM SULFATE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER magnesium sulfate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 209642-002 Nov 8, 2021 AP RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Magnesium Sulfate in Plastic Containers

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Magnesium sulfate, widely known as Epsom salt, has historically played a pivotal role in medical, agricultural, and industrial applications. Recently, the pharmaceutical sector's shift toward packaging innovations has brought magnesium sulfate in plastic containers into focus. This convergence presents significant market implications, driven by evolving regulatory standards, manufacturing advancements, and global demand patterns. This analysis explores the intricate market dynamics and projects the financial trajectory of magnesium sulfate in plastic packaging, emphasizing strategic growth opportunities and potential risks.


Market Overview

Magnesium sulfate’s multifaceted applications—ranging from obstetric care to agriculture—generate a robust demand landscape. The pharmaceutical segment specifically benefits from its usage in intravenous formulations, necessitating safe, stable, and cost-effective packaging solutions. Plastic containers, recognized for their lightweight, durability, and sterilization compatibility, increasingly replace traditional glass bottles, aligning with industry trends toward safety and efficiency [1].

Estimated global market size for magnesium sulfate was valued at approximately USD 150 million in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) projected at 4-6% through 2030. The rising demand for injectable drugs, alongside a growing preference for plastic packaging due to its logistical and safety advantages, fuels this expansion.


Market Dynamics

1. Regulatory Landscape

Increasingly stringent pharmaceutical packaging regulations globally—particularly in the U.S., Europe, and Asia—mandate safety, sterilization standards, and compatibility. Plastic container manufacturers must comply with guidelines from regulatory authorities such as the FDA and EMA, which emphasize biocompatibility, barrier properties, and environmental safety [2].

This regulatory environment acts as both a barrier and an enabler: stringent standards limit the entry of sub-standard products but concurrently incentivize innovation toward safer, sustainable plastics—like PET or polypropylene—suitable for magnesium sulfate solutions.

2. Technological Innovation

Advances in plastics technology enable enhanced barrier properties, reducing medication degradation and contamination risk. Innovations like multi-layered, antimicrobial, or bio-compatible plastics improve stability and patient safety. The development of specialized closure systems and compatibility with existing manufacturing infrastructure further propels adoption.

Additionally, serialization and track-and-trace systems demand packaging materials compatible with serialization markings, influencing material choice. These technological trends broaden the scope of plastic container applications, thereby expanding the market.

3. Supply Chain and Manufacturing Dynamics

The production of magnesium sulfate and plastic containers requires integrated supply chains. Raw material availability, such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene, and bioplastics, influences manufacturing costs and capacity. Globally, supply chain disruptions—exacerbated by geopolitical tensions or pandemics—pose risks of raw material shortages, impacting pricing and delivery timelines.

Furthermore, increased automation adoption in manufacturing improves quality consistency and reduces contamination risks, essential for pharmaceutical applications [3].

4. Competitive Landscape

Major players, including Moog Medical, Becton Dickinson, and Terumo Medical Corporation, are investing heavily in plastic container innovations. Entry barriers remain high due to proprietary technology, regulatory approvals, and capital investments. Nonetheless, niche entrants leveraging advanced plastics or sustainable packaging solutions are gaining traction, especially in emerging markets.

5. Environmental and Sustainability Trends

Environmental concerns related to plastic waste influence market dynamics profoundly. The pharmaceutical industry faces pressure to adopt biodegradable or recyclable plastics. This trend affects material selection and invention, with recyclable plastics gaining preference. Regulations in regions like the European Union’s Green Deal potentially incentivize eco-friendly packaging solutions, creating both challenges and opportunities.


Financial Trajectory

1. Revenue Forecasts

Projected compound annual growth for magnesium sulfate in plastic containers aligns with the overall pharmaceutical packaging market, estimated at 5-7% over the next decade [4]. Manufacturing investments in plastic container lines and R&D on sustainable materials are expected to accelerate revenue streams.

Pharmaceutical-grade magnesium sulfate, seeing consistent demand, particularly for maternal and neonatal care, will likely maintain stable revenue contributions. The integration of innovative packaging enhances product integrity, supporting premium pricing strategies.

2. Cost Dynamics

Costs are influenced by raw material prices, technological enhancements, and regulatory compliance expenses. The shift toward sustainable plastics may initially elevate material costs but could lead to cost savings via reduced waste management fees. Moreover, automation benefits lowering labor costs and accelerating time-to-market.

3. Investment and M&A Activity

Market consolidation is anticipated, driven by strategic mergers and acquisitions aimed at expanding technological capabilities and geographic reach. Private equity firms and multinational corporations may target smaller, innovative players specializing in sustainable packaging or advanced plastics manufacturing, thereby influencing valuation trends.

4. Profitability Outlook

Margins are projected to improve owing to operational efficiencies and premium pricing for improved safety features. However, market entrants must navigate high compliance costs and R&D investments, which could temper short-term profitability.

5. Risk Factors Influencing Financial Trajectory

Key risks include regulatory delays, raw material price volatility, technological obsolescence, and environmental compliance costs. Additionally, geopolitical tensions may disrupt supply chains. Companies that proactively innovate and diversify supplier bases are better positioned to mitigate these risks.


Strategic Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Emphasize innovation in sustainable, compliant plastic formulations to meet regulatory and environmental standards.
  • Investors: Focus on companies with differentiated product offerings, robust R&D pipelines, and diversified geographical operations.
  • Regulators: Accelerate approval pathways for sustainable packaging solutions, fostering innovation.
  • Pharma Companies: Prioritize partnerships with packaging innovators to secure compliant, safe, and sustainable packaging solutions.

Key Takeaways

  • The magnesium sulfate market in plastic containers is poised for steady growth, driven by pharmaceutical demand and packaging innovations.
  • Regulatory and environmental standards shape market entry, product development, and costs; proactive compliance and sustainability strategies are vital.
  • Technological advancements in plastics improve safety and stability, enabling premium product offerings and expanding application scopes.
  • Supply chain resilience and raw material cost management are crucial for maintaining profitability amidst global disruptions.
  • Investment opportunities exist within sustainable packaging technologies, with a focus on recyclable, bio-based plastics to align with environmental mandates.

Conclusion

The future of magnesium sulfate in plastic containers hinges on balancing regulatory compliance, technological innovation, and sustainability commitments. Companies that strategically innovate and adapt to market dynamics—while managing costs and supply chain risks—will secure long-term growth and profitability. The convergence of pharmaceutical demand, environmental imperatives, and technological progress presents an evolving landscape ripe with opportunities for industry stakeholders.


FAQs

1. What are the primary drivers for the adoption of plastic containers for magnesium sulfate in pharma?
Safety, durability, sterilization compatibility, and cost-effectiveness drive adoption, alongside regulatory trends favoring lightweight, shatter-resistant packaging.

2. How do environmental regulations impact the magnesium sulfate packaging market?
They incentivize the shift toward recyclable, biodegradable plastics, increasing R&D investments and potentially altering cost structures.

3. What technological innovations are enhancing plastic container safety for magnesium sulfate?
Multi-layered barrier plastics, antimicrobial coatings, and smart serialization features improve stability, contamination resistance, and traceability.

4. What risks threaten the financial growth of magnesium sulfate in plastic packaging?
Regulatory delays, raw material price fluctuations, supply chain disruptions, and environmental compliance costs pose significant risks.

5. Which regions offer the most promising growth opportunities for this market?
Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, due to expanding healthcare infrastructure, and environmentally progressive regions like Europe, are key growth areas.


References

[1] MarketsandMarkets. "Pharmaceutical Packaging Market by Material, Type, and Region." 2021.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Guidance for Industry: Container Closure Systems for Packaging Human Drugs and Biologics." 2020.
[3] McKinsey & Company. "The Future of Pharma Packaging." 2022.
[4] Grand View Research. "Pharmaceutical Packaging Market Size & Trends." 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.