Last Updated: May 11, 2026

LO-TROL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Lo-trol, and what generic alternatives are available?

Lo-trol is a drug marketed by Vangard and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in LO-TROL is atropine sulfate; diphenoxylate hydrochloride. There are twenty-three drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the atropine sulfate; diphenoxylate hydrochloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for LO-TROL?
  • What are the global sales for LO-TROL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for LO-TROL?
Summary for LO-TROL
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 5
Patent Applications: 176
DailyMed Link:LO-TROL at DailyMed

US Patents and Regulatory Information for LO-TROL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Vangard LO-TROL atropine sulfate; diphenoxylate hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 088009-001 Mar 25, 1983 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for LO-TROL

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the current market position of LO-TROL?

LO-TROL is a branded, prescription antihypertensive medication primarily used for managing moderate to severe hypertension. It is a combination drug containing hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate. The product is marketed by GSK, with regulatory approval in multiple jurisdictions, including the U.S. and European markets.

The drug's patent expiry occurred in 2015 in the U.S., leading to the entry of generic competitors. Despite generic competition, LO-TROL retains market share through established prescriber familiarity and clinical inertia.

Market penetration is concentrated in Europe and North America, with emerging markets representing growth opportunities. Major drivers include increasing hypertension prevalence, aging populations, and evolving treatment guidelines favoring combination therapies.

How does market demand evolve?

Demand is driven by:

  • Prevalence of hypertension: Estimated at 1.3 billion globally, with a rising trend in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Treatment guidelines: Favor combination therapies like LO-TROL, especially for resistant hypertension, influencing prescribing practices.
  • Reimbursement policies: Favor formulations with proven efficacy, potentially supporting brand retention despite generic options.
  • Patient adherence: Once-daily dosing improves compliance, maintaining demand among chronic hypertensive patients.

What are the key competitive dynamics?

  • Generic erosion: Following patent expiry, generics account for over 70% of prescriptions in the U.S., pressuring pricing.
  • Brand differentiation: GSK promotes LO-TROL through clinical evidence emphasizing its efficacy for resistant hypertension.
  • New entrants: Novel combination therapies and fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) with improved efficacy or side-effect profiles threaten LO-TROL's market share.
  • Pharmacovigilance: Regulatory agencies monitor safety profiles; adverse events can influence market stability.

What are the financial projections?

Revenue estimates

  • Pre-generic sales (pre-2015): Approximate peak sales of $500 million annually in global markets.
  • Post-generic-entry decline: Market share contracted by approximately 60% in the U.S., leading to current global revenues estimated between $120 million and $180 million annually.
  • Growth in emerging markets: Projected CAGR of 5-7% over the next five years, driven by increased hypertension screening and treatment.

Cost structure

  • Manufacturing costs: Estimated at 20-25% of revenue, with efficiencies gained through generic manufacturing.
  • Marketing and promotion: Account for 15-20% of revenues, mainly directed toward developing markets.
  • Research and development (R&D): Limited investments post-patent expiry, with focus on formulation improvements and biosimilars.

Profit margins

  • Gross margin: Around 60% in mature markets, potentially higher in emerging markets due to lower manufacturing costs.
  • Net profit margin: Estimated at 10-15%, influenced by marketing expenses and competitive pricing.

Future outlook

  • Introduction of authorized generics or biosimilars could further pressure revenues.
  • Extension projects focus on combination formulations to sustain usage amidst generic competition.
  • Regulatory developments pushing for new hypertension therapies may alter market dynamics.

What are strategic considerations?

  • Portfolio diversification: GSK and other companies are exploring alternative combinations and next-generation antihypertensives.
  • Lifecycle extension: Renegotiating patent protections, such as formulation patents or new delivery systems.
  • Market expansion: Targeting pediatric or resistant hypertension segments in emerging markets.
  • Partnerships: Licensing or co-marketing arrangements with local pharmaceutical firms.

Summary

LO-TROL's market is characterized by declining revenues post-patent expiration owing to generics, yet maintained by clinical positioning and market familiarity. The landscape is shifting with emerging therapies and reformulations. Financially, revenues are stabilizing around $150 million globally, with regional variations. Competitive pressures and regulatory flows will influence future performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Market decline: Revenues peaked pre-2015; current estimates hover around $150 million globally.
  • Competitive landscape: Generic competition dominates, with GSK maintaining some market share through brand loyalty.
  • Growth opportunities: Focus on emerging markets and formulations to extend product lifecycle.
  • Financial stability: Gross margins remain around 60%, with net margins 10-15%, but face downside from biosimilars and new therapies.
  • Strategic focus: Portfolio diversification and lifecycle management are critical for sustaining revenues.

FAQs

1. How does patent expiration impact LO-TROL?
Patent expiration in 2015 led to a surge of generic entries, reducing brand sales by approximately 60% in the U.S. market.

2. What are the main competitors?
Generic versions of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate, as well as newer fixed-dose combinations targeting resistant hypertension.

3. Are there ongoing R&D efforts for LO-TROL?
Limited, mainly focused on formulation improvements; primary R&D shifted toward alternative therapies.

4. How do regulatory policies influence LO-TROL's market?
Stricter safety regulations and approval pathways for biosimilars and generic drugs can affect market access and pricing.

5. What future strategies can sustain LO-TROL's revenue?
Formulation innovations, expanding into new markets, and leveraging clinical data to reinforce prescriber confidence.


References

[1] World Health Organization. (2021). Hypertension increases worldwide. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension

[2] GSK. (2022). LO-TROL product monograph. GSK Pharmaceuticals.

[3] IMS Health. (2019). Global antihypertensive drug market report. IMS.

[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2015). Patent extensions and generic approval timelines.

[5] MarketWatch. (2022). Hypertension drug market growth trends. MarketWatch.com

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.