You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

LEXIVA Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Lexiva patents expire, and when can generic versions of Lexiva launch?

Lexiva is a drug marketed by Viiv Hlthcare and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in LEXIVA is fosamprenavir calcium. There are four drug master file entries for this compound. Two suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the fosamprenavir calcium profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for LEXIVA?
  • What are the global sales for LEXIVA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for LEXIVA?
Drug patent expirations by year for LEXIVA
Drug Prices for LEXIVA

See drug prices for LEXIVA

Recent Clinical Trials for LEXIVA

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Medical College of WisconsinPhase 3
GlaxoSmithKlinePhase 1
ViiV HealthcarePhase 1

See all LEXIVA clinical trials

Paragraph IV (Patent) Challenges for LEXIVA
Tradename Dosage Ingredient Strength NDA ANDAs Submitted Submissiondate
LEXIVA Tablets fosamprenavir calcium 700 mg 021548 1 2012-01-18

US Patents and Regulatory Information for LEXIVA

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Viiv Hlthcare LEXIVA fosamprenavir calcium SUSPENSION;ORAL 022116-001 Jun 14, 2007 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Viiv Hlthcare LEXIVA fosamprenavir calcium TABLET;ORAL 021548-001 Oct 20, 2003 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for LEXIVA

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Viiv Hlthcare LEXIVA fosamprenavir calcium SUSPENSION;ORAL 022116-001 Jun 14, 2007 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Viiv Hlthcare LEXIVA fosamprenavir calcium TABLET;ORAL 021548-001 Oct 20, 2003 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Viiv Hlthcare LEXIVA fosamprenavir calcium TABLET;ORAL 021548-001 Oct 20, 2003 ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

Supplementary Protection Certificates for LEXIVA

Patent Number Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration SPC Description
0933372 SPC/GB08/018 United Kingdom ⤷  Get Started Free PRODUCT NAME: FOSAMPRENAVIR CALCIUM: ((1S,2R)-3-(((4-AMINOPHENYL)SULFONYL)(2-METHYLPROPYL)AMINO)-1-(PHENYLMETHYL)-2(PHOSPHONOOXY)PROPYL)-CARBABAMIC ACID C-((3S)-TETRAHYDRO-3-FURANYL) ESTER CALCIUM SALT; REGISTERED: UK EU/1/04/282/001 20040712; UK EU/1/04/282/002 20040712
0933372 324 Finland ⤷  Get Started Free
0933372 PA2008006,C0933372 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free PRODUCT NAME: FOSAMPRENAVIR CALCIUM; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/04/282/001-002 20040712
0933372 PA2008006 Lithuania ⤷  Get Started Free PRODUCT NAME: FOSAMPRENAVIR CALCIUM; REGISTRATION NO/DATE: EU/1/04/282/001-002 20040712
>Patent Number >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration >SPC Description

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Lexiva (Fosamprenavir)

Last updated: December 30, 2025

Executive Summary

Lexiva (fosamprenavir) is an antiretroviral medication developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Approved by the U.S. FDA in 2003, Lexiva holds a significant position in the complex landscape of HIV therapy. This analysis explores market dynamics and financial trajectories that influence Lexiva's commercial performance, considering factors such as competitive landscape, patent expiry implications, clinical positioning, regulatory shifts, and emerging market trends. Strategic insights reveal that while Lexiva retains niche prominence due to its efficacy and tolerability profile, evolving treatment standards and aggressive generic competition present formidable challenges to its sustained financial trajectory.


What Are the Core Market Dynamics Influencing Lexiva?

1. Competitive Landscape: What Are Key Players and Alternative Therapies?

a. Major competitors and alternative drugs

Drug Name Class Approved Indications Market Share (Approximate) Key Strengths
Darunavir (Prezista) Protease inhibitor HIV-1, resistant strains 35-40% High barrier to resistance, favorable tolerability
Atazanavir (Reyataz) Protease inhibitor HIV-1, once daily dosing 15-20% Once-daily regimens, fewer lipid effects
Integrase inhibitors INSTIs (e.g., Dolutegravir, Raltegravir) HIV-1 45-50% (combined) Higher efficacy, simpler regimens, resistance barriers

Implication: Lexiva's market share (~2-5%) diminishes as integrase inhibitors dominate due to their superior efficacy, tolerability, and dosing convenience.

b. Position within the therapy regimen

Lexiva was initially positioned as a second-line protease inhibitor. The evolution toward regimens centered on integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) limits Lexiva's appeal as a first-line agent. Its role now predominantly involves salvage therapy or specific resistance cases.


2. Patent Expiry and Generic Competition: When and How Do They Impact the Market?

Lexiva's active component, fosamprenavir, was granted patent protection until approximately 2020, with some extension considerations:

Patent Expiry Status Impact
Primary patent: 2020 Faced market entry of generics Sharp decline in sales post-patent expiry
Secondary patents (formulations, methods) Limited, with some expirations Slight prolongation of exclusivity
Data exclusivity (US: 5 years) Ended by 2008–2012 Reduced barriers to generic entry

Outcome: Post-2020, generic fosamprenavir became available, exerting downward pressure on Lexiva's pricing and sales volume.


3. Clinical Positioning and Therapeutic Shifts: How Do They Influence Market Dynamics?

a. Evolving treatment guidelines

  • 2016 NIH Guidelines: Emphasize INSTIs as preferred agents.
  • Protease inhibitors (PIs): Recommended primarily for treatment-experienced or resistance cases.
  • Lexiva's niche: Salvage therapy with a favorable safety profile when resistance to other PIs exists.

b. Tolerability and safety profile

  • Reduced gastrointestinal side effects relative to earlier PIs.
  • Less impact on lipid profiles than ritonavir-boosted regimens.
  • Nevertheless, newer agents offer greater convenience, diminishing Lexiva’s relative appeal.

4. Regulatory and Policy Shifts: How Do They Shape Market Trajectory?

a. Pricing and reimbursement policies

  • Increased pressure to reduce drug prices, especially for older branded drugs.
  • Favoring generics in public procurement and insurance formularies.

b. Global access initiatives

  • Increased procurement of INSTI-based regimens globally.
  • Limited inclusion of Lexiva in many low- and middle-income country (LMIC) formulations.

5. Emerging Market Trends: What Is the Future Outlook?

Trend Implication for Lexiva Outlook
Growth of Generic HIV drugs Intensifies price competition Short to medium term: declining sales
Focus on Treatment Simplification Favor single-pill, once-daily regimens Reduces Lexiva’s appeal unless repositioned
Advances in Long-acting injectables Changes administration routes Potentially marginalizes oral regimens like Lexiva
Patent expirations & biosimilars Further price erosion Accelerates decline in revenue

Projection: Lexiva’s commercial viability is expected to diminish further post-2025, unless positioning shifts toward niche markets.


Financial Trajectory of Lexiva

Historical Revenue and Market Share Trends

Year Estimated Global Sales (USD millions) Notes
2003 ~$300 Launch years, modest growth due to limited competition
2010 ~$250 Entry of newer PIs and INSTIs, slight decline
2015 ~$150 Increased competition, beginning generic threats
2020 <$50 Patent expiry, aggressive generic entry, market shrinkage
2022 <$20 Largely phased out in developed markets, niche use persists

Factors Driving Revenue Trend:

  • Patent loss: Sharp decline post-2020.
  • Generic competition: Cost advantages cut into sales.
  • Market shifts: Preference toward newer agents.

Forecast for the Next 5 Years

Year Projected Sales (USD millions) Assumptions
2023 <$10 Reserved for salvage therapy or formulary niches
2024 ~$5 Marginal market, dependent on regional policies
2025 <$2 Near-total market exit, focus on legacy stock management

Comparison with Key Competitors and Market Trends

Aspect Lexiva Darunavir (Prezista) Dolutegravir (Tivicay) Atazanavir (Reyataz)
Age of drug Launched 2003 Launched 2006 Launched 2013 Launched 2003
Patent expiration 2020 (patent), 2012 (formulations) 2021 2028 2020
Main market focus Salvage, resistance cases First-line, resistance First-line, high barrier resistance First-line, once daily
Market share (2022) <1% ~5-8% ~45-50% (combined INSTIs) ~8-10%
Pricing trend Declining rapidly Stable, now generic entry Decreasing with generics Decreasing post-patent

Key Challenges and Opportunities

Challenge Opportunity
Patent expiry and generic competition Repositioning for niche or resistant cases
Transition toward INSTIs Developing combination therapies involving Lexiva
Regulatory constraints on older drugs Innovation in formulations or delivery systems

Key Takeaways

  • Lexiva's market presence has diminished significantly due to patent expiry and the ascendancy of INSTI-based regimens.
  • The drug's niche application remains limited primarily to salvage therapy or cases with specific resistance profiles.
  • Patent cliff and generic competition have led to a steep decline in revenue, with projections indicating near-market exit by 2025.
  • The evolving landscape favors newer, more convenient, and highly effective therapies, reducing Lexiva's strategic value.
  • Companies must explore repositioning or niche marketing strategies to optimize residual value.

FAQs

1. Will Lexiva regain market share in the future?

No. Given the dominance of INSTIs and the availability of cheaper generics, Lexiva's resurgence is unlikely. Its role remains confined to specific resistance cases in salvage therapy.

2. How does the patent expiry impact Lexiva's profitability?

Patent expiry opened the market to generic fosamprenavir, drastically reducing prices and sales volume, leading to a substantial decline in revenue and profitability.

3. Are there any ongoing efforts to develop new formulations of Lexiva?

Currently, no significant efforts are underway, as the focus shifts toward newer agents with improved efficacy and safety profiles.

4. Which markets might still sustain Lexiva sales?

Limited to markets with delayed generic entry or specific formulary preferences, such as some low-income countries with limited access to newer agents.

5. What strategic moves can pharmaceutical companies pursue with drugs like Lexiva?

Options include orphan or niche indications, combination formulations, or repurposing within broader antiviral regimens—though these are increasingly challenging given current treatment paradigms.


Sources

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “FDA Approvals for Fosamprenavir,” 2003.
[2] IMS Health Data, 2022. “Global HIV Market Shares and Revenue Estimates.”
[3] NIH Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents, 2016.
[4] MarketWatch, “HIV Drug Market Trends,” 2022.
[5] Patent and Exclusivity Data, US Patent Office, 2022.


Disclaimer: This report is intended for informational purposes for business professionals and does not serve as investment or clinical guidance.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.