You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

FLORINEF Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Florinef, and what generic alternatives are available?

Florinef is a drug marketed by Casper Pharma Llc and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in FLORINEF is fludrocortisone acetate. There are four drug master file entries for this compound. Fourteen suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the fludrocortisone acetate profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for FLORINEF?
  • What are the global sales for FLORINEF?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for FLORINEF?
Summary for FLORINEF
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 38
Clinical Trials: 7
DailyMed Link:FLORINEF at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for FLORINEF
Recent Clinical Trials for FLORINEF

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Isfahan University of Medical SciencesPhase 3
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical SciencesPhase 3
Urmia University of Medical SciencesPhase 3

See all FLORINEF clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for FLORINEF

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Casper Pharma Llc FLORINEF fludrocortisone acetate TABLET;ORAL 010060-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Pharmaceutical Drug: FLORINEF (Fludrocortisone)

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Florinef (generic: Fludrocortisone) is a synthetic corticosteroid primarily indicated for conditions such as Addison’s disease, orthostatic hypotension, and other adrenal insufficiencies. As a medication with a well-established therapeutic profile and a broad clinical application spectrum, Florinef occupies a significant position within the corticosteroid market. This article explores the evolving market dynamics and financial trajectory shaping Florinef’s commercial landscape, driven by factors such as patent status, regulatory environment, competition, and clinical demand.


Market Overview and Key Drivers

Clinical Indications and Market Demand

Florinef’s primary therapeutic area—adrenal insufficiency—remains a niche, yet persistent, segment characterized by steady demand attributable to its critical role in hormone replacement therapy. The global incidence of Addison's disease is estimated at approximately 1 in 100,000, translating into a consistent need for replacement therapies like Florinef [1]. Moreover, off-label use in managing orthostatic hypotension and certain forms of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) sustains ongoing demand.

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The corticosteroid market, driven by chronic endocrine disorders, is projected to grow at a CAGR of around 4% globally over the next five years. While newer therapies and biologics are emerging, the entrenched role of traditional corticosteroids like Florinef ensures continuing relevance, especially in resource-constrained settings.

Key factors influencing growth include:

  • Increased diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency.
  • Growing prevalence of conditions like orthostatic hypotension in the aging population.
  • Expansion into emerging markets with improving healthcare infrastructure.
  • The long-term safety profile of Florinef, supporting its continued usage.

Market Dynamics: Opportunities and Challenges

Patent and Regulatory Environment

Florinef’s patent landscape has significantly changed over the past decade. The original patent for Fludrocortisone has expired, rendering the drug a generic commodity in many regions. This transition to generic status has led to intensified price competition, compressing profit margins for branded manufacturers [2].

Regulatory pathways have become more streamlined, with regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA facilitating approval processes for low-risk, well-established medicines. This ease of entry has contributed to a proliferation of generic manufacturers, further amplifying price competition.

Pricing and Reimbursement Trends

Generic availability translates into lower drug prices, which, while beneficial for healthcare systems, erodes margins for manufacturers. Reimbursement policies, increasingly emphasizing affordability, exert downward pressure on pricing. In developed markets, inclusion in formularies and insurance coverage becomes vital for market access.

Competitive Landscape

The market is highly fragmented with multiple generic producers and a handful of branded players. No significant patents or exclusivities are available to protect profitability. Additionally, competition from biosimilars and emerging biologics for related conditions could influence corticosteroid utilization patterns indirectly.

Supply Chain Considerations

Global supply chain disruptions—exacerbated by geopolitical tensions and pandemics—pose risks to drug availability. Manufacturers with diversified manufacturing bases and supply chain resilience are better positioned to maintain market share.


Financial Trajectory: Revenue, Profitability, and Future Outlook

Historical Revenue Trends

As a long-established drug, Florinef’s revenue streams have plateaued post-patent expiration, with annual global sales estimated in the low-to-mid hundreds of millions USD. The market volume remains relatively stable, consistent with the fixed demand driven by the chronic nature of its indications [3].

Impact of Generic Competition

Generic entry has catalyzed price erosion, realizing a significant decline in per-unit revenue for original developers. However, volumetric sales remain resilient, driven by clinical necessity and limited substitution options.

Profitability and Cost Structures

Margins for Florinef manufacturers have declined appreciably. Large-scale production, regulatory compliance, and marketing costs for generics incur fixed expenses, while competitive pricing pressures restrict pricing models. Companies investing in manufacturing efficiency and supply chain management can optimize profitability.

Future Financial Outlook

In the absence of significant therapeutic innovations or new patent protections, Florinef’s revenue outlook remains subdued but stable. The adoption of formulations with extended shelf-life or improved bioavailability could enhance competitive positioning, though such innovations are unlikely to dramatically alter the overall market size.

Emerging markets present growth opportunities fueled by improving healthcare access and increasing diagnosis rates. Strategic partnerships, local manufacturing, and competitive pricing will be vital components of future revenue strategies.


Regulatory and Market Trends Influencing Future Trajectory

  • Generic Consolidation: Mergers and acquisitions among generic manufacturers could lead to price stabilization or volatility.
  • Regulatory Stringency: Stricter quality standards and manufacturing compliance may increase costs but improve market credibility.
  • Digital and Pharmacovigilance Initiatives: Enhanced monitoring can bolster safety profiles, supporting continued use.
  • Potential for New Formulations: Extended-release or inhalable forms are not current; innovation may create niche markets, though such developments are speculative.

Key Challenges for Sustained Financial Performance

  • Pricing Pressure: Increasing emphasis on cost-effective healthcare discourages high-margin pricing.
  • Market Saturation: Once fully genericized, growth relies purely on volume.
  • Limited Therapeutic Innovation: Minimal pipeline activities hinder expansion beyond existing indications.
  • Competition from Alternative Therapies: Emerging treatments for adrenal-related conditions could influence prescription patterns.

Conclusion: Navigating the Market Landscape

The future of Florinef’s market and financial trajectory hinges on navigating sustained generic competition, managing manufacturing efficiencies, and seizing opportunities in emerging markets. While revenue growth prospects are limited by decreasing per-unit prices, the chronic demand associated with its indications offers stability. Companies that focus on supply chain resilience, cost management, and strategic regional expansion can maximize profitability within this mature segment.


Key Takeaways

  • Market stability stems from consistent demand in adrenal insufficiency and related conditions, despite limited growth prospects.
  • Patent expiration has led to intense generic competition, pressuring prices and margins.
  • Emerging markets offer modest growth potential driven by improving healthcare infrastructure and diagnosis rates.
  • Innovation opportunities are scarce, but niche formulations or delivery methods may provide competitive advantages.
  • Cost efficiency and supply chain resilience are critical for maintaining profitability amid pricing pressures.

FAQs

1. How does patent expiry affect Florinef's market?
Patent expiry has led to multiple generic manufacturers entering the market, increasing competition, reducing prices, and eroding profit margins for original patent-holders.

2. What are the primary clinical conditions driving Florinef demand?
The main indications include Addison's disease, adrenal insufficiency, orthostatic hypotension, and certain hypotensive syndromes, all necessitating hormone replacement therapy.

3. Are there upcoming therapeutic innovations that could impact Florinef?
Currently, no major innovations threaten Florinef’s market. However, novel formulations or delivery systems could provide niche differentiation in the future.

4. How do reimbursement policies influence Florinef's market access?
Reimbursement strategies favor low-cost generics, often favoring competitive pricing and formulary inclusion, which influences market penetration and revenue.

5. What strategies can manufacturers adopt to sustain profitability?
Focusing on supply chain efficiency, regional market expansion, strategic cost management, and maintaining quality standards are vital for sustained profitability.


Sources
[1] National Institutes of Health (NIH). Addison’s Disease Statistics.
[2] MarketWatch. Generic Corticosteroids Market Overview, 2022.
[3] IQVIA. Global Corticosteroid Sales Report, 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.