Last Updated: May 12, 2026

DORAL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Doral patents expire, and when can generic versions of Doral launch?

Doral is a drug marketed by Galt Pharms and is included in one NDA. There is one patent protecting this drug.

The generic ingredient in DORAL is quazepam. There are two drug master file entries for this compound. One supplier is listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the quazepam profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Generic Entry Outlook for Doral

By analyzing the patents and regulatory protections it appears that the earliest date for generic entry will be June 3, 2028. This may change due to patent challenges or generic licensing.

Indicators of Generic Entry

< Available with Subscription >

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for DORAL?
  • What are the global sales for DORAL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for DORAL?
Summary for DORAL
US Patents:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 1
Patent Applications: 4,086
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in DORAL?DORAL excipients list
DailyMed Link:DORAL at DailyMed
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for DORAL
Generic Entry Date for DORAL*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
NDA:
Dosage:
TABLET;ORAL

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

US Patents and Regulatory Information for DORAL

DORAL is protected by one US patents.

Based on analysis by DrugPatentWatch, the earliest date for a generic version of DORAL is ⤷  Start Trial.

This potential generic entry date is based on patent ⤷  Start Trial.

Generics may enter earlier, or later, based on new patent filings, patent extensions, patent invalidation, early generic licensing, generic entry preferences, and other factors.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Galt Pharms DORAL quazepam TABLET;ORAL 018708-003 Feb 26, 1987 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Galt Pharms DORAL quazepam TABLET;ORAL 018708-001 Dec 27, 1985 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for DORAL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Galt Pharms DORAL quazepam TABLET;ORAL 018708-001 Dec 27, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Galt Pharms DORAL quazepam TABLET;ORAL 018708-003 Feb 26, 1987 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Galt Pharms DORAL quazepam TABLET;ORAL 018708-001 Dec 27, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Galt Pharms DORAL quazepam TABLET;ORAL 018708-001 Dec 27, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

DORAL: Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 26, 2026

What is DORAL in the market?

Doral” is a branded prescription product containing quazepam (benzodiazepine hypnotic) marketed for insomnia. The product is historically associated with later-cycle brand erosion driven by (1) patent/market exclusivity expiry, (2) generic penetration, and (3) regulatory and channel shifts in controlled-substance products.

The market reality for Doral is that it is no longer positioned as a high-growth, protected monopoly asset in most developed markets. Its financial trajectory has been shaped by generic substitution and the general decline in brand pricing power for older small-molecule sleep agents once exclusivities expire.

How does competition shape Doral’s dynamics?

Doral faces competition across three layers:

  1. Generic quazepam (direct substitution)
  2. Other hypnotics (therapeutic substitution): newer non-benzodiazepine hypnotics and other sleep agents compete for formulary space and prescriber preference
  3. Payer utilization management: step edits, prior authorization, and quantity limits in insomnia categories (common for controlled-substance hypnotics)

In practice, direct substitution is the dominant pressure because quazepam is a well-defined molecule and is typically substitutable at the molecule level. That structure compresses pricing and tends to move remaining brand sales into a shrinking niche.

What regulatory and controlled-substance mechanics matter?

Quazepam-based products operate in a controlled-substance framework, which drives:

  • Prescriber and dispensing friction relative to non-controlled sleep agents
  • Ongoing compliance costs across distribution channels
  • Higher sensitivity to guideline and payer scrutiny around benzodiazepine hypnotics

This affects both volume retention and reimbursement stability, especially as payers shift preferred coverage toward newer or more administratively convenient options.

What is the financial trajectory pattern for Doral-like brands?

Doral fits the standard lifecycle profile of older hypnotic brands once generics enter:

  • Peak brand sales occur pre-generic entry
  • Post-generic entry: rapid unit and revenue decline, with any remaining brand sales concentrated in a smaller customer base (patients stable on brand, clinician preference, limited payer exceptions)
  • Late-cycle: brand profitability depends more on cost structure and channel retention than pricing power

The trajectory is typically measured by declining net sales and shrinking contribution margins as wholesalers and pharmacies shift to lower-cost alternatives.

What do the market data sources indicate about Doral’s current position?

Public-facing product identity data aligns Doral with quazepam and places it within standard prescription channels. Market performance depends on jurisdiction-specific generic availability. Under typical market conditions for older benzodiazepine hypnotics, the brand’s competitive position deteriorates after generic entry.

Doral’s molecule-level definition is consistent across regulatory listings, while sales performance is largely governed by generic pricing and payer formularies.

Product identity and molecule attribution

  • Doral is quazepam (benzodiazepine hypnotic) [1].

Where does Doral sit across payer behavior and formularies?

For insomnia drugs, payer behavior tends to follow a repeatable pattern:

  • Prefer lower acquisition cost options once generic equivalents exist
  • Apply step therapy to direct patients away from older classes if clinically acceptable alternatives exist
  • Use quantity limits and monitoring requirements to manage controlled-substance exposure

For Doral specifically, generic quazepam availability tends to displace the brand in covered tiers. That reduces the brand’s ability to maintain revenue unless a payer exception persists.

What does this mean for future revenue capacity?

Given the category dynamics:

  • Brand revenue headroom is limited by generic substitution
  • Volume growth is constrained because molecule-level competition is not only price-based but also formulary-based
  • Any residual growth must come from narrow segments (brand continuity, specific prescriber habits, localized reimbursement quirks)

In most markets, this translates into a mature-to-declining revenue profile rather than a cyclical rebound.


Market dynamics by driver (impact direction and mechanism)

Driver Likely direction for Doral Mechanism
Generic quazepam entry Down Wholesale and pharmacy substitution to lower-cost molecule
Payer formulary tightening Down Lower tiers for older hypnotics once alternatives exist
Controlled-substance friction Down/flat Utilization management and compliance requirements
Patient brand stickiness Flat/down Smaller remaining population stable on brand
Category innovation (newer sleep agents) Down Therapeutic substitution and prescriber preference shifts

Financial trajectory: what the business curve usually looks like

For a Doral-branded quazepam product, investors and R&D planners should model the financial curve as follows:

1) Short-term: normalization after generic penetration

  • Brand pricing compresses quickly
  • Net sales fall faster than units because of pricing and reimbursement pressure

2) Medium-term: declining profitability as marketing leverage falls

  • Remaining sales become concentrated in lower-velocity channels
  • Promotional spend often does not scale revenue meaningfully in generic markets

3) Long-term: residual niche economics

  • Brand retains only a small share where substitution barriers exist
  • Corporate focus shifts from expanding brand equity to minimizing cash leakage

What strategic implications follow for R&D and investment decisions?

Doral’s market structure implies that future economic upside from the brand line is structurally capped. For business development and investment screens:

  • Treat Doral as a cash-extraction or decline-managed asset, not a growth engine
  • Value future opportunity through differentiation elsewhere: new insomnia mechanisms, improved safety or tolerability profiles, or non-benzodiazepine positioning with better payer acceptance
  • If evaluating a quazepam program, the economic model depends on whether it can avoid direct generic substitution or win a distinct formulary niche through differentiated delivery, dosing regimen, or claims-driven payer advantages (not the classic brand approach)

Key Takeaways

  • Doral is quazepam, a benzodiazepine hypnotic facing strong generic and formulary substitution pressure [1].
  • Market dynamics trend toward brand pricing compression and volume erosion once generics exist.
  • Financial trajectory for Doral-like mature hypnotic brands follows a decline-to-niche pattern, with limited growth capacity driven by payer and substitution behavior.
  • Business models should treat the brand as late-cycle economics, not a reliable platform for expansion without meaningful differentiation.

FAQs

  1. Is Doral a unique drug in the insomnia market?
    No. Doral is quazepam, which is substitutable at the molecule level and typically faces generic pressure [1].

  2. What is the biggest revenue risk for Doral?
    Generic substitution of quazepam, combined with payer formulary displacement, drives rapid brand erosion once available.

  3. Does payer behavior affect Doral differently than other insomnia drugs?
    Yes. As a benzodiazepine hypnotic, Doral can face tighter utilization management and greater scrutiny in insomnia categories, especially under controlled-substance rules.

  4. Can Doral still maintain some brand sales after generic entry?
    Often, yes, but mainly as a niche: patients and prescribers who remain stable on the brand and localized payer exceptions.

  5. What should investors assume about Doral’s growth prospects?
    Growth prospects are usually limited after generic penetration; economic upside generally requires differentiation beyond the traditional brand life-cycle.


References

[1] FDA. (n.d.). Doral (quazepam) information and listing. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.