Last Updated: May 26, 2026

CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Cytoxan (lyophilized) patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Cytoxan (lyophilized) is a drug marketed by Baxter Hlthcare and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) is cyclophosphamide. There are nineteen drug master file entries for this compound. Twenty-six suppliers are listed for this compound. Additional details are available on the cyclophosphamide profile page.

DrugPatentWatch® Litigation and Generic Entry Outlook for Cytoxan (lyophilized)

A generic version of CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) was approved as cyclophosphamide by BAXTER HLTHCARE on May 21st, 2008.

  Start Trial

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)?
  • What are the global sales for CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)?
Summary for CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)
Recent Clinical Trials for CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Hideho Okada, MD, PhDPhase 1
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Phase 1
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)Phase 1

See all CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Baxter Hlthcare CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) cyclophosphamide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 012142-004 Aug 30, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) cyclophosphamide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 012142-009 Dec 10, 1985 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) cyclophosphamide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 012142-010 Sep 24, 1985 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date Patent No. Patent Expiration
Baxter Hlthcare CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) cyclophosphamide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 012142-008 Jan 4, 1984 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) cyclophosphamide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 012142-010 Sep 24, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED) cyclophosphamide INJECTABLE;INJECTION 012142-009 Dec 10, 1985 ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >Patent No. >Patent Expiration

CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED): Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is CYTOXAN (lyophilized) in commercial and regulatory terms?

CYTOXAN (cyclophosphamide) is the brand name for an alkylating chemotherapy used across oncology regimens. The “lyophilized” presentation is the freeze-dried formulation for reconstitution and administration. Commercially, CYTOXAN’s market behavior is shaped by (1) long-lived oncology demand, (2) pricing and contracting dynamics typical of hospital-administered chemotherapy, and (3) competitive pressure from generics and authorized alternatives.

Because cyclophosphamide is an off-patent, widely available cytotoxic agent, CYTOXAN’s revenue performance is structurally driven less by new-efficacy claims and more by procurement, formulary status, supply continuity, and payer contracting.

How do market dynamics affect CYTOXAN’s demand profile?

Demand characteristics

CYTOXAN demand is concentrated in institutional oncology channels (hospital outpatient infusion, inpatient oncology, specialty distributors). Forecasting is typically anchored to:

  • Treatment incidence and regimen mix in cancers where cyclophosphamide remains standard (e.g., breast cancer in combination regimens, lymphoma, and other hematologic/solid tumor indications).
  • Protocol-driven continuity: many regimens use cyclophosphamide as a component that remains stable across product cycles.

Competitive structure

Cyclophosphamide is heavily genericized. CYTOXAN competes against:

  • Multiple generic cyclophosphamide injectable products priced through contracting and volume.
  • Biosimilar-type competition is not applicable (not a biologic), but generic substitution is operationally significant under standard hospital pharmacy procurement practices.

Procurement and contracting

Hospital formularies and group purchasing organization (GPO) arrangements typically determine:

  • Net pricing through rebates, discounts, and contract-specific “best net” pricing.
  • Treatment continuity when supply constraints emerge for any injectable oncology product.

Supply and continuity risks

Injectable oncology products with manufacturing complexity can show short-term price and allocation swings. CYTOXAN’s “lyophilized” formulation typically supports stability and logistics but still faces:

  • Lot-level manufacturing constraints.
  • Regulatory and quality performance that influences availability.

What drives pricing and revenue trajectory for an older oncology injectable?

For off-patent injectables, the financial trajectory typically follows a “contracting gravity” model:

  1. Baseline volume persists due to established clinical use.
  2. Net price compresses over time as generic penetration rises and contracting intensifies.
  3. Material revenue changes usually occur due to supply disruptions, major contracting events (GPO/formulary switches), or large shifts in distributor/hospital inventory behavior.

For CYTOXAN specifically, key levers that historically move branded revenue in generics-heavy categories are:

  • Substitution pressure: when purchasing organizations shift to lower-cost generic vials/strength equivalents.
  • Access events: formulary additions and removals, contract re-bids, and payor coverage changes.
  • Manufacturing continuity: interruptions can temporarily stabilize branded positioning if supply for alternatives is constrained.

How has the overall cyclophosphamide injectable market behaved financially?

The broader cyclophosphamide injectable market has been characterized by:

  • Stable clinical demand across years for oncology combinations.
  • Long-run price erosion as generics broaden and competition increases.
  • Revenue concentration among distributors and manufacturers with consistent supply and compliant product supply chains.

Branded CYTOXAN’s financial path should be expected to mirror the category’s net price pressure:

  • High share losses to generics over time.
  • Periodic stabilization when branded supply is preferred due to quality, availability, or contracting outcomes.

What is the financial trajectory for CYTOXAN (lyophilized) and what does it imply for revenue?

A complete, numbers-backed revenue trajectory for “CYTOXAN (LYOPHILIZED)” requires product-level historical sales and segment reporting. In the absence of product-specific financial line items, the most defensible conclusion is structural:

  • CYTOXAN’s revenue trend is expected to follow category-wide dynamics for off-patent injectables: declining branded net sales over the long term with short-term volatility driven by contracting and supply.

This category structure implies:

  • Margin compression for branded supply where net pricing tracks contracting outcomes rather than patent-driven premiums.
  • Revenue fragility to any supply event that affects availability or prompts procurement shifts.

Where does CYTOXAN sit in portfolio economics for investors and R&D decision-makers?

Commercial role

CYTOXAN functions as:

  • A stabilized oncology incumbent with demand persistence.
  • A product whose profitability depends on efficient manufacturing, supply continuity, and strong contracting performance rather than IP exclusivity.

Investment lens

For investors and strategists, the financial trajectory is typically assessed via:

  • Net sales resilience (how quickly volume shifts to generics).
  • Contract renewal cycles (how much net price improves or declines year-to-year).
  • Supply reliability metrics (capacity and compliance performance).

Operational priorities that affect financial outcomes

  • Manufacturing scale and cycle yield for lyophilized sterile injectables.
  • Stability and packaging validation for reconstitution usability.
  • Contracting strategy through distributors and group purchasing.

What product and labeling facts constrain market behavior?

CYTOXAN’s labeling and clinical use establish it as a cytotoxic chemotherapy with established prescribing patterns. Market dynamics remain constrained by:

  • Standard oncologic protocols using cyclophosphamide.
  • Safety-driven handling and administration practices in oncology clinics.

Product labeling also anchors market access because hospitals typically follow standard dosing and administration practices for this class of injectable chemotherapy.

Market outlook: how should CYTOXAN’s trajectory evolve under typical off-patent conditions?

Given the generic nature of cyclophosphamide injectables, a rational trajectory expectation is:

  • Continued long-run net price pressure.
  • Ongoing share leakage to lower-cost competitors.
  • Periodic stabilization during supply constraint windows or contract lock-ins.

The key swing factors for CYTOXAN are:

  • Whether branded supply is positioned as preferred when competing products face allocation.
  • How quickly contracts reprice at renewal.

Key Takeaways

  • CYTOXAN (lyophilized) is a branded cyclophosphamide injectable operating in an off-patent, generics-dense oncology market where revenue is driven by contracting, formulary position, and supply continuity rather than patent exclusivity.
  • Market demand is persistent due to protocol-based use in oncology, but branded net sales face long-run price erosion from generic substitution.
  • The financial trajectory is expected to show structural volume pressure with episodic volatility tied to contracting outcomes and supply availability.
  • For commercial planning and investment screening, the most decision-relevant metrics are contract renewal outcomes, GPO/formulary status, and manufacturing continuity rather than differentiation claims.

FAQs

1) Is CYTOXAN (lyophilized) protected by ongoing patent exclusivity?

Cyclophosphamide is an off-patent small molecule widely available as generics; CYTOXAN branded revenue primarily reflects contracting and supply positioning rather than patent-driven market power.

2) What market channel most affects CYTOXAN sales?

Institutional oncology procurement through hospitals, outpatient infusion settings, distributors, and GPO contracting.

3) What typically causes short-term CYTOXAN revenue swings?

Supply interruptions or allocation dynamics across cyclophosphamide injectables, combined with contract repricing and distributor inventory behavior.

4) How does generic substitution influence CYTOXAN’s financial trajectory?

It compresses net pricing over time and reduces branded share unless branded supply is preferred due to availability, quality assurance, or specific contract terms.

5) What is the highest-leverage operational driver for revenue?

Manufacturing continuity and reliable availability of lyophilized sterile product that supports stable institutional purchasing decisions.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “CYTOXAN (cyclophosphamide) label / prescribing information.” FDA.
[2] FDA. “FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations” (cyclophosphamide products). FDA.
[3] National Cancer Institute (NCI). “Cyclophosphamide” (general information on clinical use in oncology). NCI.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.