Last Updated: September 28, 2026

CEFIZOX Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Cefizox patents expire, and when can generic versions of Cefizox launch?

Cefizox is a drug marketed by Astellas and is included in three NDAs.

The generic ingredient in CEFIZOX is ceftizoxime sodium. There is one drug master file entry for this compound. Additional details are available on the ceftizoxime sodium profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for CEFIZOX?
  • What are the global sales for CEFIZOX?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for CEFIZOX?
Summary for CEFIZOX
Recent Clinical Trials for CEFIZOX

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
University of KhartoumPhase 4
Ministry of Health, SudanPhase 4

See all CEFIZOX clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CEFIZOX

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Astellas CEFIZOX ceftizoxime sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 063294-002 Mar 31, 1994 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Astellas CEFIZOX IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER ceftizoxime sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050589-001 Oct 3, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Astellas CEFIZOX ceftizoxime sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050560-003 Sep 15, 1983 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Astellas CEFIZOX IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER ceftizoxime sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050589-002 Oct 3, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Astellas CEFIZOX ceftizoxime sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050560-002 Sep 15, 1983 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Astellas CEFIZOX ceftizoxime sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 063294-003 Mar 31, 1994 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

CEFIZOX market dynamics and financial trajectory: How exclusivity, pricing, and competitive pressure shape revenue from launch through generic/biosimilar risk

Last updated: July 30, 2026

CEFIZOX is a branded product name used for cefixime (oral cephalosporin). Market dynamics for cefixime are dominated by (1) mature “older antibiotic” demand cycles, (2) payer-driven pricing compression, (3) exposure to guideline shifts away from cephalosporins in selected indications, and (4) generic availability that structurally limits long-run branded revenue.

What is CEFIZOX and what market does it compete in?

Featured snippet answer: CEFIZOX (cefixime) competes in outpatient treatment of bacterial infections and typically faces a mature generic environment with pricing pressure and limited brand durability.

Which therapeutic areas does cefixime typically target?

Common cefixime positioning (varies by country and label) clusters around:

  • Respiratory tract infections (e.g., otitis media, sinusitis, bronchitis in appropriate settings)
  • Urinary tract infections (uncomplicated, where clinically appropriate)
  • Uncomplicated skin/soft tissue infections (label-dependent)
  • “Step-down” use when oral therapy is clinically indicated

What is the prescribing and payer reality for oral cephalosporins?

  • Many cephalosporins in this class are substituted quickly at the pharmacy level through payer formularies.
  • In many markets, the dominant economics come from generic cefixime tablets/capsules rather than branded products.
  • Branded antibiotics in mature classes usually depend on differentiation levers that are limited in antibiotics: dosing convenience, pediatric formulations, and contracting.

How do pricing and competitive generic entry drive CEFIZOX revenue?

Featured snippet answer: In a mature antibiotic molecule like cefixime, branded revenue is typically constrained by rapid generic substitution and recurrent pricing resets through pharmacy benefit managers and wholesalers.

What competitive forces suppress long-term branded margins?

  1. Generic substitution
    • Once generic cefixime is widely listed, branded volumes fall unless payer contracts maintain preferential tiers.
  2. Wholesale and procurement pricing
    • Public tenders and hospital procurement drive low net pricing for older antibiotics.
  3. Antibiotic stewardship and guideline shifts
    • Stewardship programs reduce unnecessary broad-spectrum use, often shifting volume toward narrow-spectrum or guideline-aligned alternatives.

What does “market structure” mean for the financial trajectory?

  • Early revenue can follow launch momentum and stocking.
  • Mid-life revenue generally flattens as formularies shift to generics.
  • Late-life revenue declines track net price erosion more than unit volumes, because many scripts can remain therapeutic substitutes even as the payer switches the brand.

When does CEFIZOX lose exclusivity and what does that do to unit and net sales?

Featured snippet answer: For cefixime products, branded exclusivity typically collapses once core composition of matter or formulation/indication protection expires and generics are authorized. Revenue usually declines after generic penetration and payer tier moves.

Exclusivity timeline dynamics that matter

Even where regulatory exclusivity exists for specific formulations or pediatric extensions, cefixime’s competitive baseline is shaped by:

  • Molecule-level patent expiry (composition and key manufacturing routes)
  • Formulation patents (if any, e.g., extended-release or pediatric suspension stability)
  • Regulatory data exclusivity (where applicable by jurisdiction)

What generic entry risk exists for a branded cefixime product?

  • “Risk” is less about biosimilar pathways (cefixime is not biologic) and more about:
    • Generic approval and launch
    • Formulary listing
    • Substitution policies (automatic generic substitution where allowed)
    • Contracting and tender awards

How do formulary access and reimbursement decisions affect CEFIZOX financial outcomes?

Featured snippet answer: Branded cefixime performance is usually tied to whether it holds a preferred tier for key indications in major payers or tender categories.

Formulary levers that change net revenue

  • Placement on preferred or non-preferred tiers
  • Prior authorization requirements
  • Quantity limits and step therapy
  • Pediatric listing for suspension formats (if supported by local evidence)

Tender and procurement effects (hospital channel)

Hospital procurement tends to:

  • Favor lowest net-cost generics
  • Use tender specifications that effectively screen out higher-cost branded products unless a brand is contracted on price-volume agreements

How does CEFIZOX compare with other oral cephalosporins on market traction?

Featured snippet answer: Cefixime’s commercial profile is shaped by competition among oral beta-lactams where clinicians and payers weigh spectrum, dosing convenience, resistance patterns, and total cost.

Competitive substitutability cluster

Common comparators by class (varies by country and label):

  • Amoxicillin/clavulanate
  • Cefpodoxime proxetil
  • Cefuroxime axetil
  • Cephalexin (when spectrum aligns)
  • Macrolides or fluoroquinolones in selected indications where guidelines allow

What determines whether cefixime wins volume?

  • Local resistance patterns and guideline preferences
  • Availability of pediatric formulations and dosing schedules
  • Practical coverage in the same infection syndromes

What is the Orange Book status of CEFIZOX and which filings drive generic substitution?

Featured snippet answer: CEFIZOX is a brand name; for US “Orange Book” risk analysis, the relevant item is the underlying active ingredient (cefixime) and all associated listed drug numbers and patent expiration/Paragraph IV exposure. A complete Orange Book mapping requires an exact US NDA/ANDA listing for “CEFIZOX.”

What patent estate protects CEFIZOX and how strong is it?

Featured snippet answer: The practical strength for cefixime-based brands usually depends on whether the product has any still-active patents beyond molecule-level IP, such as specific formulations, polymorphs, manufacturing controls, or indication-specific claims.

Patent estate components that affect litigation risk

  • Composition of matter (often long expired for older antibiotics)
  • Formulation and dosage form patents (stability, excipients, pediatric suspension specs)
  • Methods of treatment (if any remain)
  • Process/manufacturing patents (quality and control-related claims)

How to interpret “strength” for a mature antibiotic

  • Even if patents exist, branded revenue is constrained by:
    • High substitution by generics
    • Payer contracting that ignores weaker brand-specific value
    • Lack of differentiated clinical endpoints versus generic equivalents

What Paragraph IV litigation and settlements would shape CEFIZOX’s generic launch?

Featured snippet answer: For non-biologic cefixime products, the key legal mechanism is Paragraph IV challenges on Orange Book-listed patents, which can delay generic entry via court stays. A complete assessment requires named patent numbers, NDA/ANDA relationships, and case docket coverage.

What FDA regulatory pathway dynamics affect CEFIZOX market timing?

Featured snippet answer: For small-molecule antibiotics like cefixime, regulatory dynamics typically determine generic authorization timing rather than long-term brand exclusivity.

Why regulatory mechanics are central for revenue trajectory

  • If generics gain approvals quickly, brand sales typically decline.
  • If exclusivity delays generic approvals, brand sales can extend.

How does CEFIZOX financial trajectory usually evolve across the product lifecycle?

Featured snippet answer: Branded cefixime revenue typically follows a launch rise, then transitions to plateau and then decline driven by generic substitution and net price erosion.

Stage-by-stage revenue pattern for a mature molecule

  • Launch/early years: uptake through prescriber adoption, initial contracting, and limited generic competition
  • Mid-life: increasing generic presence and tier movement, leading to volume share loss and price compression
  • Late-life: steep decline after major generic launches and tender consolidation, with residual sales only where contracts preserve brand position

Which geographies matter most for CEFIZOX economics?

Featured snippet answer: Cefixime brand economics are highly sensitive to local patent enforcement and generic penetration speed.

Geography drivers

  • Strength and duration of local patent coverage
  • Generic approvals and time-to-market after eligibility
  • Public tender practices
  • Formularies and substitution rules

What manufacturing and IP barriers affect generic competition for CEFIZOX?

Featured snippet answer: For cephalosporin oral products, manufacturing and quality controls are often less of a barrier than pricing and speed of generic approval once formulation equivalence is established.

Key practical barriers

  • Bioequivalence and formulation stability (especially for suspensions)
  • Analytical method control for QC release
  • Finished product specs that can be harder to match for low-cost entrants

Key Takeaways

  • CEFIZOX (cefixime) competes in a mature antibiotic market where branded revenue is structurally pressured by rapid generic substitution.
  • Financial trajectory typically transitions from launch growth to plateau and then decline as payers move to generics and net price compresses.
  • The core determinant of exclusivity and generic entry risk is the active patent and regulatory listing around the specific branded product and its dosage forms, not the general cefixime molecule alone.
  • For revenue forecasting and litigation/lifecycle strategy, the decisive inputs are the relevant NDA/ANDA listings, patent expiry schedule, and Paragraph IV or settlement history tied to the brand’s listed drug entries.

FAQs

  1. How do pharmacy substitution rules change cefixime brand pricing power?
  2. What indicators show when branded cefixime volumes start shifting to generics?
  3. Which payer contracting patterns most strongly influence net sales for oral antibiotics?
  4. How do pediatric formulations (suspensions) alter generic competition for cefixime?
  5. What litigation signals usually precede generic launch for cefixime brands?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm
  2. FDA. Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/abbreviated-new-drug-applications-anda

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.