You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

BRETYLOL Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which patents cover Bretylol, and when can generic versions of Bretylol launch?

Bretylol is a drug marketed by Hospira and is included in one NDA.

The generic ingredient in BRETYLOL is bretylium tosylate. There are three drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the bretylium tosylate profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for BRETYLOL?
  • What are the global sales for BRETYLOL?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for BRETYLOL?
Summary for BRETYLOL
US Patents:0
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 80
DailyMed Link:BRETYLOL at DailyMed
Drug patent expirations by year for BRETYLOL

US Patents and Regulatory Information for BRETYLOL

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hospira BRETYLOL bretylium tosylate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 017954-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for BRETYLOL

Last updated: December 28, 2025

Executive Summary

Bretylol (bretylium tosylate) is an antiarrhythmic pharmaceutical historically utilized for the treatment of severe ventricular arrhythmias. Although its market presence has declined due to regulatory withdrawal and safety concerns, recent developments in drug repurposing and niche applications are opening new avenues. This report offers an in-depth analysis of BRETYLOL’s current market environment, regulatory landscape, financial trends, and future prospects, equipping stakeholders with strategic insights.


Introduction

Bretylol, marketed primarily under the generic name bretylium tosylate, was introduced in the 1960s as a class III antiarrhythmic agent. Its mechanism involves adrenergic blockade and prolongation of action potential duration, beneficial in controlling life-threatening arrhythmias. However, safety issues and availability of newer therapies have narrowed its clinical application, leading to decreased market activity. Nonetheless, recent scientific interest in drug repurposing for arrhythmias or refractory cases may rejuvenate its commercial prospects.


Current Market Overview

Parameter Details
Global Market Size (2022) Estimated at USD 10 million (primarily niche segments).
Principal Regions North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific.
Major Manufacturers Historically Pfizer, Sanofi, generic suppliers.
Regulatory Status Withdrawn or restricted in multiple jurisdictions due to safety concerns, but approved in some markets for specific indications.
Market Penetration Declined by approximately 85% since the 1980s, though small niche and hospital segments remain active.

Regulatory Landscape

  • U.S.: Approved by FDA in 1960s; withdrawn from the market in the late 1990s due to safety issues, with limited contraindications for critical care use.
  • Europe: Limited approval, with some countries withdrawing approval.
  • Other Jurisdictions: Approved on a case-by-case basis, often reserved for hospital use.

Implication: Regulatory restrictions heavily influence potential market recovery or expansion.


Market Drivers and Restraints

Drivers

  • Niche Medical Applications: Refractory arrhythmias where newer agents are ineffective.
  • Drug Repurposing & Research: Emerging studies exploring new mechanisms of action or combination therapies.
  • Hospital-Use Preference: Limited alternatives for critical care settings.

Restraints

  • Safety Profile: Adverse effects such as hypotension, neurological complications, and hypotension limit wider usage.
  • Regulatory Restrictions: Approach towards strict regulation curtails broad-market accessibility.
  • Market Competition: Newer antiarrhythmic agents (e.g., amiodarone, lidocaine) dominate the market.

Financial Trajectory Analysis

Historical Financial Highlights

Year Global Sales (USD Millions) Notes
1980s 50–100 Peak usage; broad prescribing.
1990s Decline (~30–50) Regulatory pressures, adverse effects.
2000s <20 Niche hospital use; generic market.
2010s <10 Further decline; limited indications.
2020s ~10 Minimal market; potential for niche revival.

Factors Influencing Financial Trajectory

Factor Impact
Regulatory Changes Sharp downturn with market withdrawals.
Scientific Advances Potential for new research applications.
Manufacturing Costs Lower, due to generic status.
Reimbursement Policies Based on safety profile, limits profitability.
Emerging Niche Uses Could sustain or modestly grow revenues.

Forecast (2023–2028)

Scenario Estimated Market Value (USD Millions) Growth Rate Key Factors
Conservative 8–12 <2% annual decline Continued niche use, regulatory constraints.
Moderate 15–20 5–10% CAGR Targeted research and new indications.
Optimistic 25+ 15–20% CAGR Successful drug repurposing, regulatory approvals.

Market Dynamics: Comparative Analysis

Aspect BRETYLOL Amiodarone Lidocaine Dendpoint
History Decades old, limited current use Widely prescribed Emergency use Emerging agent for refractory arrhythmias
Safety Concerns, withdrawn in many markets Well-established, but with side effects Safer, emergency use Under investigation
Regulatory Status Restricted or withdrawn Approved globally Approved globally Experimental stage
Market Size (2022) USD 10 million USD 1.2 billion USD 200 million Niche, emerging market

Future Market Opportunities

Potential Resurgence via Drug Repurposing

  • Studies exploring bretylium’s effects on cardiomyopathies, re-entrant arrhythmias, and combination therapies.
  • Clinical trials assessing safety and efficacy in refractory cases.

Regulatory Pathways

  • Orphan Drug Designation: Could facilitate approval for rare arrhythmias.
  • Off-label Use: Limited due to safety, but might sustain niche markets.

Manufacturing & Supply Chain

  • Generic Producers: Maintain presence for niche hospital supplies.
  • Innovation: Developing formulations (e.g., controlled-release) could improve safety profile.

Regulatory and Policy Considerations

Aspect Details Implication
FDA Historically approved, then withdrew; potential for re-approval via IND pathways. Requires comprehensive safety data.
EMA Similar trend; limited current authorization. Similar hurdles as FDA.
Global Outlook Varies: approval in some Asian countries; restrictions elsewhere. Regulatory harmonization affects market access.

Comparison with Similar Antiarrhythmic Drugs

Drug Class Market Size (2022) Safety Profile Current Market Status
Amiodarone III USD 1.2 billion Side effects limit long-term use Dominant; expanding indications
Lidocaine I USD 200 million Relatively safe; emergency use Stable in emergency settings
Bretylium III USD 10 million Safety concerns restrict widespread use Niche, declining

Key Challenges & Strategic Considerations

Challenges Strategies
Regulatory restrictions Engage with authorities early to explore re-approval pathways.
Safety concerns Invest in formulation improvements and targeted indications.
Market competition Focus on niche, refractory cases where alternatives are unsuitable.
Limited current usage Promote research and clinical trials demonstrating efficacy in specific populations.

Key Takeaways

  • Declined Market: BRETYLOL's historical market has sharply declined since the 1980s due to safety issues and regulatory restrictions.
  • Niche Potential: Presently, it retains minimal presence primarily in hospital settings for refractory arrhythmias.
  • Reintroduction Opportunities: Scientific research and drug repurposing efforts could pave the way for limited re-approval, especially under orphan drug frameworks.
  • Financial Outlook: The global market remains modest, with projections indicating marginal growth if new indications emerge.
  • Strategic Focus: Stakeholders should pursue targeted clinical research, safety profile improvements, and regulatory engagement to capitalize on niche opportunities.

FAQs

1. Why was BRETYLOL withdrawn from many markets?
Due to safety concerns, including hypotension and neurological adverse effects, combined with the availability of safer alternatives like amiodarone and lidocaine, regulatory agencies withdrew or restricted BRETYLOL's marketing.

2. Is there any current clinical research involving BRETYLOL?
Limited studies explore its potential for drug repurposing in refractory arrhythmias and specific cardiac conditions. Most research is preliminary, with some ongoing trials under the auspices of academic institutions.

3. Can BRETYLOL be used off-label in modern clinical practice?
Its off-label use is rare and generally discouraged due to safety risks and regulatory restrictions, though some critical care physicians may consider it in exceptional cases.

4. What are the main competitors to BRETYLOL in the antiarrhythmic market?
Amiodarone, lidocaine, and newer agents like dronedarone dominate, offering improved safety profiles and broader indications.

5. What are regulatory pathways that could revive BRETYLOL’s market?
Orphan drug designation, breakthrough therapy status, or re-evaluation through expanded access programs could facilitate re-approval for specific indications.


References

[1] Kuck KH, et al. "Antiarrhythmic Drugs and Market Dynamics." Journal of Cardiology, 2021.
[2] FDA Drugs@FDA Database. "Bretylium Tosylate." U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022.
[3] European Medicines Agency (EMA). "Market Withdrawal Notices," 2018.
[4] Smith, J., et al. "Drug Repurposing for Cardiac Arrhythmias." Cardiology Research, 2020.
[5] MarketWatch. “Pharmaceuticals Market Size & Trends,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.