Last Updated: June 19, 2026

ALFENTA Drug Patent Profile


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


When do Alfenta patents expire, and what generic alternatives are available?

Alfenta is a drug marketed by Rising and Hospira and is included in two NDAs.

The generic ingredient in ALFENTA is alfentanil hydrochloride. There are two drug master file entries for this compound. Additional details are available on the alfentanil hydrochloride profile page.

AI Deep Research
Questions you can ask:
  • What is the 5 year forecast for ALFENTA?
  • What are the global sales for ALFENTA?
  • What is Average Wholesale Price for ALFENTA?
Recent Clinical Trials for ALFENTA

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Rabin Medical CenterN/A
Helsinki University Central HospitalPhase 4
Martin AngstN/A

See all ALFENTA clinical trials

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ALFENTA

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Rising ALFENTA alfentanil hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 019353-001 Dec 29, 1986 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Hospira ALFENTANIL alfentanil hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 075221-001 Oct 28, 1999 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for ALFENTA

See the table below for patents covering ALFENTA around the world.

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Finland 64364 ⤷  Start Trial
Norway 148747 ⤷  Start Trial
Sweden 7805110 ⤷  Start Trial
Italy 1105288 N-FENIL-N 4-PIPERIDINIL AMMIDI SOSTITUITE UTILI IN PARTICOLARE COME AGENTI ANALGESICI ⤷  Start Trial
Yugoslavia 40703 ⤷  Start Trial
Yugoslavia 108578 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration
Last updated: June 14, 2026

ALFENTA (alfentanil) Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory: Exclusivity, Pricing, Competition, and Revenue Outlook

ALFENTA is an IV opioid analgesic containing alfentanil. In the US, market performance and competitive dynamics are shaped by (1) opioid demand trends and formulary access, (2) controlled-substance compliance and distribution economics, (3) generic substitution risk, and (4) the degree of remaining branded exclusivity vs. fully generics-led penetration. Because ALFENTA is an older, widely manufactured controlled-substance opioid, the financial trajectory is typically characterized by commoditized pricing pressure once multiple abbreviated products are established.


What is ALFENTA (alfentanil) and who sells it?

ALFENTA is an injectable opioid analgesic for anesthesia and perioperative analgesia. Market structure is driven by hospital procurement and anesthesia service lines, with purchasing concentrated among large group purchasing organizations (GPOs) and institutional formularies.

Core market attributes affecting revenue

  • Route/form: IV injection, hospital-administered.
  • Customer concentration: anesthesiology departments, surgery centers, teaching hospitals.
  • Regulated distribution: controlled-substance handling, state/federal compliance, tighter pharmacy controls.
  • Demand drivers: surgical volumes, anesthesia utilization patterns, labor scheduling in OR settings, and perioperative care protocols.
  • Substitution dynamics: alfentanil is widely available as generics; switching costs are low relative to novel therapeutics.

How fast does alfentanil commoditize: what generic entry risks exist for ALFENTA?

For established opioids like alfentanil, commercial trajectories usually move from branded advantage to price erosion once generic supply stabilizes and formulary committees grant access.

Generic substitution playbook

  • Hospital switching is typically driven by:
    • acquisition cost benchmarks across GPO contracts,
    • availability and fill-rate performance,
    • stability/handling fit with existing anesthesia protocols,
    • internal opioid stewardship policies and controlled substance documentation workflows.
  • Branded product retention is usually limited to:
    • contracts where the branded SKU is a preferred line item,
    • institutions with entrenched product selection or specific clinician preference,
    • periods where generic supply is constrained or compliance friction favors a single distributor.

Paragraph IV and exclusivity-driven entry

For ALFENTA, the dominant commercial risk is generally not delayed patent-expiration-based entry. It is the broader economics of multi-source generic penetration and distributor-led price compression.


What patents protect ALFENTA and how strong is the patent estate for alfentanil?

ALFENTA’s commercial ceiling is typically determined by whether any enforceable composition-of-matter, method-of-use, or formulation/manufacturing patents still block generic competition in key markets.

How to assess estate strength (what matters financially)

  • Expiration timing for any remaining US patents listed for ALFENTA (Orange Book).
  • Scope breadth of remaining claims:
    • claim coverage of the exact alfentanil composition,
    • any dosing regimen limitations (method-of-use),
    • any stability or formulation changes (rare for legacy injectable opioids, but possible).
  • Litigation posture:
    • whether generics have already invalidated/limited key claims,
    • whether settlements created “brand exclusivity shadow” windows.

Commercial linkage

A strong, late-expiring patent estate would keep ALFENTA priced above generics and support higher gross margin. A weak or expired estate usually results in:

  • rapid net price compression after multi-source access,
  • margin normalization for suppliers,
  • reduced differentiation and marketing spend constraints.

What is the Orange Book status of ALFENTA (alfentanil) and what does it imply for timelines?

In US commercialization, the Orange Book listing status is the practical gateway for forecasting generic entry. For legacy, multi-source injectables, Orange Book status often shows:

  • early-epoch patent expirations,
  • one or more remaining use or process patents (if any),
  • and a current landscape dominated by generic label copies.

Featured snippet answer

Orange Book status determines whether any FF/OF (first-time marketing/other factors) exclusivity or listed patents still require paragraph IV pathways before generic entry.


When does ALFENTA lose exclusivity and what are the key expiration dates?

For established opioids, exclusivity questions usually boil down to:

  • earliest patent expirations for composition and uses,
  • any remaining patent families with later expiration dates,
  • and whether any patent litigation delayed effective generic launch.

What drives the “effective” loss of exclusivity

Even after legal expiration, revenue often declines at different rates depending on:

  • generic supply breadth (how many vendors),
  • hospital contract renegotiations and tender cycles,
  • distributor rebates and GPO contract renewals.

How does ALFENTA compare with other injectable opioids in anesthesia: does price elasticity differ?

ALFENTA competes within a class environment of IV anesthetic adjunct opioids (and adjacent analgesics), with substitution typically based on:

  • clinician preference for onset/offset,
  • institutional formulary preferences,
  • concentration and packaging compatibility with existing pumps and anesthesia carts,
  • supply continuity.

Commercial comparison dimensions

  • Net price versus alternatives after rebates.
  • Institutional switching probability by clinical workflow.
  • Supply risk: single-source vs multi-source vulnerability.
  • Utilization share: OR mix, case complexity, and anesthesia protocols.

What generic entry risks exist for alfentanil injections by dosage strength and package?

Revenue risk depends on how many generics can offer:

  • the same strength(s),
  • identical or equivalent labeling,
  • compatible package formats (vials, concentrations),
  • and manufacturability with reliable sterility assurance.

Dose-strength risk

If the branded product has multiple strengths, the fastest revenue erosion usually comes where:

  • the competitor set is strongest,
  • the hospital can standardize and reduce SKU complexity.

What patent litigation affects ALFENTA and how do settlements influence generic launches?

For legacy injectable opioids, litigation patterns tend to resolve early in the patent life cycle, with later-stage generic entry driven more by manufacturing and supply economics than continuing legal uncertainty.

Financial mechanism

  • settlements and consent judgments can create short-term branded protection,
  • court decisions can accelerate generic entry and trigger faster price drops.

What is the FDA regulatory status of ALFENTA (NDA/ANDA landscape)

Commercial status is tied to how many ANDA products exist and whether they are full or rely on 505(b)(2) pathways, plus any ongoing drug shortages, distribution constraints, or labeling changes.

How regulatory status maps to revenue

  • ANDA density correlates with price competition intensity.
  • Supply disruptions can temporarily lift branded/net pricing and reduce substitute share.
  • Label changes can affect formulary inclusion if they alter perioperative positioning.

How do drug shortages and supply constraints influence ALFENTA market dynamics?

For sterile injectables, revenue volatility can rise when:

  • manufacturing outages reduce generic fill,
  • controlled-substance logistics constrain availability,
  • regulatory inspection outcomes delay supply.

Typical effect

  • Net price can rise short term for whichever supplier maintains consistent inventory.
  • Hospitals may standardize during shortages, then revert after supply normalizes, creating a “lumpy” revenue pattern.

What do revenue and gross margin trajectories typically look like for legacy opioids like alfentanil?

For older, generics-competed sterile injectables, financial trajectories usually show:

  • initial branded dominance followed by steep net price erosion,
  • gross margin compression driven by:
    • higher competitive rebates,
    • distributor margin pressure,
    • tenders favoring lowest net acquisition cost,
  • revenue stabilization once multiple suppliers compete and pricing reaches a floor tied to production and compliance costs.

Key revenue sensitivity

  • surgical volumes and OR scheduling,
  • contract pricing renewals and tender cycles,
  • supply continuity and shortage-driven substitution outcomes.

Who are the likely competitors and buyers in the US alfentanil market?

Buyer map

  • large hospital systems and health networks,
  • ambulatory surgery centers (depending on anesthesia protocol standards),
  • GPO contracts that determine tier pricing.

Supplier map

  • branded ALFENTA manufacturer/distributor during periods of dominance,
  • generic manufacturers with ANDA approvals for alfentanil injection.

What commercial strategy options exist if patent headwinds and generic pressure intensify?

In commoditized sterile injectables, strategy usually shifts from clinical differentiation to operational and contracting advantages:

  • securing preferred formulary tier positioning through contract rebates,
  • minimizing SKU sprawl by aligning package format with tender preference,
  • ensuring fill-rate reliability and supply continuity,
  • leveraging pharmacovigilance and controlled-substance compliance to reduce hospital switching friction.

Key Takeaways

  • ALFENTA’s financial trajectory is primarily driven by generic substitution intensity, contract pricing cycles, and supply continuity, not by long exclusivity runways typical of newer brands.
  • Patent and Orange Book status largely determine the earliest opportunity for generics to enter, but in legacy alfentanil markets the ongoing driver is multi-source commoditization.
  • The most meaningful revenue volatility comes from shortage/supply constraints and GPO/tender repricing, which can temporarily lift net pricing before competition resets.
  • Commercial upside is operational: fill-rate, contracting, and compliance-driven retention in hospital systems.

FAQs

Which FDA ANDA products compete with ALFENTA, and how many multisource suppliers exist?

How do hospital tender cycles and GPO contract renewals affect net pricing for alfentanil injections?

What is the pricing impact of drug shortages for controlled-substance sterile injectables like alfentanil?

Do method-of-use or formulation patents materially change generic entry risk for alfentanil?

How does perioperative case mix (inpatient vs outpatient) influence alfentanil utilization and revenue?


References (APA)

  1. FDA. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/orange-book-data-files
  3. FDA. (n.d.). Drug Shortages. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/drug-shortages

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.