Share This Page
Suppliers and packagers for tykerb
✉ Email this page to a colleague
tykerb
Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | NDA/ANDA | Supplier | Package Code | Package | Marketing Start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis | TYKERB | lapatinib ditosylate | TABLET;ORAL | 022059 | NDA | Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation | 0078-0671-19 | 150 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (0078-0671-19) | 2016-08-03 |
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >NDA/ANDA | >Supplier | >Package Code | >Package | >Marketing Start |
Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: TYKERB
Introduction
TYKERB (lapatinib) is an oral targeted therapy used primarily in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer and advanced gastric cancer. As a kinase inhibitor, its commercial success hinges on a robust supply chain consisting of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturers, formulation developers, and distributors. This analysis details the primary suppliers associated with TYKERB, emphasizing their roles, market positions, and implications for stakeholders.
Manufacturers of Lapatinib API
The core of TYKERB's supply chain is the production of its active pharmaceutical ingredient, lapatinib. Several pharmaceutical and generic manufacturers are involved in API synthesis, with some possessing patent rights, while others are engaged in generic manufacturing post-patent expiration.
1. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
GSK initially developed and commercialized TYKERB. Its manufacturing facilities are primarily located in Europe and North America, employing high-quality, cGMP-certified processes to ensure compliance with regulatory standards (FDA, EMA). GSK remains a key supplier for the original branded product, although some production capacities might have been transitioned or licensed to other manufacturers as part of strategic partnerships or licensing agreements.
2. Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd.
Hengrui, a leading Chinese pharmaceutical company, is involved in the manufacture of generic formulations of lapatinib. Although the company's primary focus is downstream formulation and distribution, it has been reported to have capabilities for API production, potentially serving as an alternative supplier in the Asian markets.
3. Teva Pharmaceuticals
Teva, one of the world's largest generic pharmaceutical companies, has previously produced generic versions of lapatinib following patent expiry in various jurisdictions. They possess extensive API manufacturing capabilities, with facilities certified by international regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA.
4. Mylan (now part of Viatris)
Mylan has engaged in the manufacture of generic oncology drugs, including lapatinib, leveraging its global API manufacturing and supply chain infrastructure. As part of its portfolio, Mylan has supplied lapatinib APIs to various generic drug makers worldwide.
5. Other Emerging API Suppliers
India-based API manufacturers, including Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories and Cipla, have expressed interest or begun manufacturing lapatinib APIs under licensing agreements or technological collaborations. These suppliers play an increasing role in the global supply chain, especially in markets with high demand for cost-effective, quality-assured generics.
Supply Chain Dynamics and Regulatory Implications
The supply chain for TYKERB's API is influenced by patent protections, licensing agreements, and manufacturing capacity. GSK maintains control over its proprietary API manufacturing, while generic manufacturers operate under licensing or production agreements post-patent expiration. Regulatory approvals, especially by the FDA, EMA, and other national agencies, are essential for manufacturing and distribution legitimacy.
Supply disruptions can occur due to geopolitical factors, quality control issues, or capacity limitations. Recent trends indicate an increasing shift towards Asia-based API production, notably India and China, which may impact supply security and pricing.
Distribution and Commercialization
Beyond API manufacturing, distribution channels significantly influence TYKERB’s availability. GSK manages global distribution for their branded TYKERB, while licensed generic manufacturers distribute versions within specific regions. Strategic partnerships with regional distributors or contract sales organizations ensure consistent drug supply, especially in emerging markets.
Future Outlook and Market Trends
The ongoing expiration of patent rights in various jurisdictions is expected to foster a proliferation of generic lapatinib suppliers. Emerging manufacturing hubs and advancements in synthetic chemistry could further streamline API production costs and capacity, impacting pricing and market access. Moreover, supply chain resilience initiatives—such as diversified manufacturing and quality assurance frameworks—will be critical for maintaining consistent TYKERB availability amid global disruptions.
Key Supplier Considerations for Stakeholders
- Regulatory compliance: Ensuring suppliers meet international cGMP standards is paramount.
- Capacity and scalability: Assessing manufacturers’ ability to scale production during demand surges.
- Quality assurance: Verifying consistent API quality to meet stringent safety and efficacy standards.
- Intellectual property rights: Navigating licensing agreements and patent statuses to mitigate legal risks.
- Market diversification: Balancing reliance across multiple suppliers to prevent supply shortages.
Conclusion
The supply landscape for TYKERB, anchored by GSK and complemented by emerging generic manufacturers, reflects a complex interplay of proprietary rights, manufacturing capabilities, and regional regulatory frameworks. Moving forward, the diversification of API sources and strengthened supply chain resilience will be instrumental in ensuring uninterrupted access to lapatinib worldwide.
Key Takeaways
- GSK remains the primary supplier of TYKERB’s patented API, with ongoing licensing agreements with other manufacturers.
- Indian and Chinese API producers are increasingly vital players, especially for generic versions following patent expiry.
- Regulatory compliance and supply chain diversification are critical for maintaining consistent availability.
- Capacity expansion and quality assurance practices will influence future market stability and pricing.
- Strategic partnerships and licensing agreements shape the geographical distribution of TYKERB and its generics.
FAQs
1. Who are the primary manufacturers of lapatinib API globally?
The main producers include GSK (original innovator), Jiangsu Hengrui, Teva, Mylan (Viatris), and other emerging Asian API suppliers like Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories and Cipla.
2. How does patent status influence supply chain options for TYKERB?
Patent protections typically restrict generic production initially, with patent expiration enabling licensing agreements and new generics, expanding supply options and reducing prices.
3. Are there regional differences in TYKERB supply sources?
Yes. Developed markets primarily rely on GSK and licensed manufacturers, while Asian markets utilize local generics from companies like Hengrui, Cipla, and Dr. Reddy’s.
4. What quality standards must TYKERB API suppliers meet?
Suppliers must adhere to international cGMP standards, with regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA conducting audits and approving manufacturing facilities to ensure safety, efficacy, and quality.
5. What future trends could impact TYKERB’s supply chain?
Patent expirations, geopolitical shifts, advancements in API synthesis, and global supply chain resilience initiatives will shape the future landscape of TYKERB’s API supply.
Sources
[1] GSK official reports and publications on TYKERB manufacturing.
[2] Market intelligence reports on oncology drug API manufacturing.
[3] Indian and Chinese pharmaceutical regulatory filings.
[4] Patent expiry and licensing details published by legal and industry analysts.
[5] World Health Organization (WHO) data on global pharmaceutical manufacturing standards.
More… ↓
