You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for lopid


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


lopid

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Pfizer Pharms LOPID gemfibrozil CAPSULE;ORAL 018422 NDA Parke-Davis Div of Pfizer Inc 0071-0737-20 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0071-0737-20) 2004-03-30
Pfizer Pharms LOPID gemfibrozil CAPSULE;ORAL 018422 NDA Parke-Davis Div of Pfizer Inc 0071-0737-30 500 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0071-0737-30) 2004-03-30
Pfizer Pharms LOPID gemfibrozil TABLET;ORAL 018422 NDA Parke-Davis Div of Pfizer Inc 0071-0737-20 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0071-0737-20) 2004-03-30
Pfizer Pharms LOPID gemfibrozil TABLET;ORAL 018422 NDA Parke-Davis Div of Pfizer Inc 0071-0737-30 500 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0071-0737-30) 2004-03-30
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Lopid (Gemfibrozil)

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Lopid (gemfibrozil) is a lipid-lowering medication primarily prescribed to reduce triglycerides and modestly elevate HDL cholesterol levels. As a fibrate class drug, it plays a crucial role in managing hyperlipidemia and preventing cardiovascular disease. The global pharmaceutical supply chain for Lopid encompasses a range of manufacturers, both branded and generic, operating across multiple geographies. Understanding the landscape of suppliers is essential for stakeholders involved in procurement, distribution, and regulatory compliance.


Global Manufacturing Landscape of Lopid

1. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)

Lopid was first introduced by Abbott Laboratories (now Abbott) in the 1980s. The original manufacturer held proprietary rights for the brand name and associated production processes. Over time, patent expirations and regulatory approvals facilitated the entry of generic manufacturers.

2. Generic Drug Producers

Following patent expiry, numerous generic pharmaceutical companies entered the market, producing gemfibrozil in various formulations. Generics are often manufactured by companies based in India, China, Europe, and North America. The most prominent producers include:

  • Mylan (now part of Viatris)
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals
  • Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Aurobindo Pharma
  • Lupin Pharmaceuticals
  • Cipla

These companies leverage established manufacturing facilities compliant with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) to produce gemfibrozil as a low-cost generic alternative.


Major Suppliers and Manufacturing Hubs

India and China dominate the manufacturing landscape for generic gemfibrozil, owing to their extensive API (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient) production infrastructures. Indian companies like Sun Pharma, Aurobindo, and Lupin have been key players, with facilities approved by global regulatory agencies including the U.S. FDA, EMA, and WHO.

Europe and North America host manufacturing plants that produce gemfibrozil mainly for the domestic markets, with some exports. Companies such as Teva and Mylan maintain diversified portfolios with GMP-compliant facilities in these regions.


Supply Chain and Regulatory Considerations

The suppliers' adherence to regulatory standards is critical. Many suppliers maintain approval from multiple agencies, ensuring products meet quality, safety, and efficacy standards globally. The reliance on API producers from India and China poses potential supply risks related to geopolitical tensions, regulatory scrutiny, and supply chain disruptions, especially highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Key regulatory considerations include:

  • FDA approvals for manufacturing facilities.
  • EMA certifications for European markets.
  • WHO GMP certifications for international distribution.

The globalization of supply for gemfibrozil underscores the importance of comprehensive due diligence and diversification of suppliers to mitigate risks.


Supply Dynamics and Market Trends

The segment of generic gemfibrozil suppliers remains stable, driven by high demand from healthcare providers treating lipid disorders. Price competition among generics keeps costs low, but supply chain vulnerabilities can impact availability.

In recent years, biosimilar and alternative fibrate formulations have expanded the therapeutic landscape, prompting some suppliers to diversify their portfolios. Nonetheless, gemfibrozil remains a staple in lipid management, ensuring resilient demand for established suppliers.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical distributors should prioritize suppliers with strong GMP compliance, robust capacity, and reliable regulatory track records.
  • Healthcare providers and procurement agencies should verify regulatory approvals and manufacturing standards.
  • Regulatory authorities should monitor API supply sources, particularly from high-risk regions, to prevent shortages and ensure drug quality.

Conclusion

The global supply chain for Lopid (gemfibrozil) features a broad spectrum of manufacturers, predominantly based in India and China, expanding the availability and affordability of this essential drug. While multiple suppliers support the market, ongoing geopolitical and regulatory challenges necessitate strategic procurement and risk management practices.


Key Takeaways

  • The supply of Lopid primarily depends on generic manufacturers from India and China, with US and European firms also contributing.
  • Ensuring GMP compliance and regulatory approvals are vital to maintaining quality and supply stability.
  • Diversification of suppliers is essential to mitigate geopolitical and supply chain risks.
  • Regulatory agencies play a key role in overseeing manufacturing standards across jurisdictions.
  • Market resilience for Lopid relies on regulatory vigilance, supplier quality assurance, and adaptable procurement strategies.

FAQs

  1. Who are the leading suppliers of gemfibrozil globally?
    Leading suppliers include Indian companies like Sun Pharma, Aurobindo, Lupin, and international firms such as Teva and Mylan, all with GMP-certified manufacturing facilities.

  2. What are the main risks associated with Lopid supply chain dependencies?
    Risks include supply disruptions from API shortages, geopolitical tensions affecting manufacturing regions, and regulatory compliance issues impacting production.

  3. How do regulatory agencies influence Lopid's manufacturing and distribution?
    Agencies such as the US FDA and EMA ensure compliance with GMP standards, approve manufacturing facilities, and monitor quality, thereby influencing supply chain integrity.

  4. Are there alternative drugs to Lopid for lipid management?
    Yes, fibrates like fenofibrate, as well as statins and newer lipid-lowering agents, are alternatives, but Lopid remains a key option where specific patient needs are identified.

  5. How can stakeholders ensure a reliable Lopid supply?
    By diversifying suppliers, verifying regulatory approvals, maintaining inventory buffers, and engaging in continuous supply chain monitoring.


References

[1] Abbott Laboratories - Product literature and historical data on Lopid.
[2] Market analysis reports on global generic pharmaceutical manufacturing, 2022.
[3] U.S. FDA import and manufacturing approvals for gemfibrozil API.
[4] Industry insights on API production and distribution in India and China.
[5] WHO guidelines on GMP compliance and international drug standards.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.