Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for griseofulvin


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


griseofulvin

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Actavis Mid Atlantic GRISEOFULVIN griseofulvin, microsize SUSPENSION;ORAL 065394 ANDA Actavis Pharma, Inc. 0472-0013-04 120 mL in 1 BOTTLE (0472-0013-04) 2007-07-26
Chartwell Rx GRISEOFULVIN griseofulvin, microsize SUSPENSION;ORAL 065200 ANDA Chartwell RX, LLC. 62135-968-41 120 mL in 1 BOTTLE (62135-968-41) 2005-03-02
Cipla GRISEOFULVIN griseofulvin, microsize SUSPENSION;ORAL 065354 ANDA Cipla USA Inc. 69097-361-08 120 mL in 1 BOTTLE (69097-361-08) 2017-03-06
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for griseofulvin

Last updated: April 24, 2026

Who supplies griseofulvin for pharmaceuticals?

Which companies supply griseofulvin API and/or drug product?

Griseofulvin is sourced through multiple commercial channels, but supplier visibility varies by jurisdiction, dosage form, and whether the item is supplied as API, intermediate, or finished dosage.

Commercial supplier set (commonly listed in trade and distribution channels):

  • HiMedia Laboratories (India)
  • Alkem Laboratories (India)
  • Mylan / Viatris (legacy generics distribution; product-level availability depends on market)
  • Teva (legacy generics distribution; product-level availability depends on market)
  • Teligent/Watson legacy channels (finished product distribution depends on market history)

API and chemical-grade sourcing channels (typical for griseofulvin):

  • China-based specialty chemical manufacturers that list griseofulvin in catalog form and supply into finished-dose and compounding markets (supplier identity depends on exact grade, e.g., USP/EP, and on regulatory status in the destination country).
  • Indian API/chemical distributors that resell griseofulvin to local finished-dose manufacturers and wholesalers.

Practical implication for procurement:
The most reliable match comes from procurement via licensed distributors (finished-dose) or qualified API manufacturers (API) who can provide documentation by destination: CEP/DMF where applicable, CoA, batch release, and compliance statements. Supplier identity changes by territory.

What are the key sourcing checkpoints for griseofulvin?

Griseofulvin is often purchased as either:

  • API (raw material grade for formulators)
  • Finished dosage (tablet formulations for end markets)

To reduce supply risk, qualification should require:

  • Grade alignment (USP, BP/EP, or local pharmacopoeia claim)
  • Regulatory documentation (DMF/CEP where applicable to destination)
  • GMP status (manufacturer audit evidence)
  • Analytical CoA controls (identity, assay, related substances, particle size if relevant, microbial limits if stated)
  • Formulation constraints (crystalline form and bioavailability considerations for tablets)

Where does griseofulvin typically sit in the supply chain?

  • API manufacturers and resellers supply raw material to finished-dose manufacturers
  • Finished-dose manufacturers distribute to wholesalers by country
  • Importers handle local registration and batch release

Because griseofulvin is an older molecule, supply often concentrates in:

  • legacy generic product portfolios
  • specialty antifungal supply chains
  • regional distributors with established low-volume inventory

What determines which supplier can be used in a specific market?

Supplier eligibility is usually driven by:

  • Local registration status (whether the finished product is authorized)
  • Whether the target is API or dosage (different supplier universe)
  • Pharmacopoeia grade and documentation package
  • Batch release requirements for the destination country

Which categories of suppliers matter most for operational procurement?

  1. Licensed finished-dose distributors (if you buy tablets/suspension)
  2. Qualified API manufacturers (if you formulate or compound)
  3. Lab/chemical catalog suppliers (often not ideal for regulated manufacturing unless they support GMP and full regulatory artifacts)

Key Takeaways

  • Griseofulvin sourcing typically runs through licensed distributor channels for finished dosage and API manufacturer or qualified reseller channels for bulk.
  • Supplier identity depends on whether procurement targets API versus finished tablets and on destination regulatory status.
  • Qualification should focus on grade, GMP/DMF/CEP documentation, CoA controls, and batch release alignment.

FAQs

  1. Is griseofulvin usually sourced as API or finished dosage?
    Both are available; API is used by formulators, while finished dosage is distributed for direct market use.

  2. Do the same companies supply both griseofulvin API and finished tablets?
    No. API suppliers and finished-dose distributors/manufacturers are often different entities.

  3. What documents should a griseofulvin supplier provide for regulated supply?
    CoA per batch and regulatory artifacts aligned to destination (for example DMF/CEP where applicable), plus GMP evidence.

  4. Does pharmacopoeia grade affect supplier selection?
    Yes. Suppliers must match USP/EP/BP or local grade claims and analytical specifications.

  5. How stable is griseofulvin supply compared with newer antifungals?
    It is typically more dependent on regional generic portfolios and inventory planning, which can shift supplier availability by market.

References

[1] HiMedia Laboratories. Griseofulvin product information.
[2] USP-NF. Griseofulvin monograph and specifications (USP).
[3] European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines (EDQM). CEP database search for griseofulvin (if applicable).
[4] Pharmacopoeial Forum. Harmonization notes and monograph references for griseofulvin (as applicable).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.