You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: flecainide acetate


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


flecainide acetate

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Amneal Pharm FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 075442 ANDA A-S Medication Solutions 50090-6810-0 60 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (50090-6810-0) 2009-12-01
Amneal Pharm FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 075442 ANDA AvPAK 50268-320-15 50 BLISTER PACK in 1 BOX, UNIT-DOSE (50268-320-15) / 1 TABLET in 1 BLISTER PACK (50268-320-11) 2015-02-12
Amneal Pharm FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 075442 ANDA AvPAK 50268-321-15 50 BLISTER PACK in 1 BOX, UNIT-DOSE (50268-321-15) / 1 TABLET in 1 BLISTER PACK (50268-321-11) 2015-02-12
Amneal Pharm FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 075442 ANDA Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC 53746-641-01 100 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (53746-641-01) 2009-12-01
Amneal Pharm FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 075442 ANDA Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC 53746-641-10 1000 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (53746-641-10) 2009-12-01
Amneal Pharm FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 075442 ANDA Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC 53746-642-01 100 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (53746-642-01) 2009-12-01
Amneal Pharm FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 075442 ANDA Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York LLC 53746-642-10 1000 TABLET in 1 BOTTLE (53746-642-10) 2009-12-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Flecainide Acetate

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Flecainide acetate is a potent antiarrhythmic agent classified under class IC agents, widely prescribed to manage supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Its effectiveness and safety profile hinge significantly on reliable sourcing from approved, high-quality suppliers. This analysis delineates the landscape of suppliers supplying flecainide acetate, analyzing their market presence, regulatory compliance, manufacturing capacity, and strategic implications for stakeholders.

Global Market Overview for Flecainide Acetate Suppliers

The industrial procurement of flecainide acetate primarily involves pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturers capable of adhering to stringent regulatory standards, including Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), and delivering consistent product quality.

Key players span across North America, Europe, and Asia, with China and India emerging as dominant API producers owing to cost-effectiveness and manufacturing scale. Major pharmaceutical companies typically source from multiple suppliers to mitigate supply chain risks and ensure product authenticity.

Principal Suppliers and Their Profiles

1. Teva Pharmaceuticals

Background: As one of the world's leading generic pharmaceutical companies, Teva supplies a broad portfolio of APIs, including flecainide acetate. They boast extensive manufacturing facilities in Israel, India, and Europe.

Capabilities: Teva emphasizes high-quality standards with GMP certifications, ISO compliance, and a robust supply chain network. Their API production for flecainide acetate adheres to strict regulatory audits, ensuring global market access.

Market Position: Teva's global reach and reputation as a reliable supplier make them a preferred choice for pharmaceutical companies seeking consistency and regulatory compliance.

2. Hubei Hongyan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (China)

Background: Specializing in cardiovascular APIs, Hongyan has established itself as a prominent Chinese manufacturer of flecainide acetate.

Capabilities: The company offers competitive pricing, large-scale production capacity, and adherence to international standards. Their product quality conforms to Chinese GMP and, upon validation, meets U.S. and European quality benchmarks.

Market Position: Hongyan is often a strategic partner for companies seeking cost-effective API options, especially in the Asian and emerging markets.

3. Mizuho Pharmaceutical (Japan)

Background: Mizuho Pharmaceuticals is known for high-quality API production, with a focus on cardiovascular drugs.

Capabilities: The company maintains rigorous quality control systems aligned with Japanese GMP standards, emphasizing purity and consistency.

Market Position: Mizuho supplies both branded and generic APIs to markets requiring high safety margins, including Japan and North America.

4. Aurobindo Pharma (India)

Background: Aurobindo is a major Indian API manufacturer with extensive experience in cardiovascular active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Capabilities: Their facilities are GMP-certified, and they produce flecainide acetate at a large scale for export to North America and Europe.

Market Position: Cost competitiveness, extensive distribution network, and regulatory compliance bolster Aurobindo’s prominence in the flecainide acetate supply chain.

5. Mylan (USA/Europe)

Background: A targeted supplier of specialty APIs and finished formulations, Mylan offers flecainide acetate produced in its facilities complying with global standards.

Capabilities: Mylan emphasizes product quality, with a focus on meeting the regulatory requirements of major markets like the U.S., EU, and Japan.

Market Position: Mylan's strong distribution and regulatory track record position it as a strategic partner for pharmaceutical innovators and generic players.

Emerging Suppliers and Trends

In addition to established players, several emerging Chinese and Indian API manufacturers are expanding their offerings of flecainide acetate. The trend reflects a broader move toward regionalization of API manufacturing to reduce costs and improve supply chain resilience.

Key Trends:

  • Regulatory Harmonization: Suppliers are increasingly obtaining WHO-GMP, US FDA, and EMA approvals for their flecainide acetate APIs.
  • Vertical Integration: Manufacturers are integrating supply chains to control quality and delivery timelines.
  • Quality-Price Balance: Buyers prioritize verified quality compliance alongside competitive pricing, complicating the supplier evaluation process.

Regulatory and Quality Considerations

Suppliers must demonstrate compliance with evolving international standards. While sourcing from Chinese and Indian manufacturers may present cost advantages, due diligence regarding quality certifications, audit history, and batch consistency remains paramount.

Regulatory certifications to verify include:

  • GMP compliance (WHO, US FDA, EMA)
  • ISO certifications
  • Certificates of Analysis (CoA) for each batch
  • Stability and purity profiles

Supply Chain and Strategic Implications

Dependence on a limited number of suppliers can expose pharmaceutical companies to risks such as supply disruptions, quality fluctuations, or regulatory non-compliance. Diversification strategies, including engaging multiple suppliers and conducting regular audits, can mitigate these risks.

Furthermore, ongoing geopolitical tensions and trade restrictions may influence supplier availability, emphasizing the importance of building resilient supply chains with qualified manufacturing partners.

Conclusion

The landscape of flecainide acetate suppliers is dynamic and globally distributed. Established multinational giants such as Teva, Aurobindo, and Mylan remain dominant, while Chinese and Indian manufacturers are gaining ground through cost competitiveness and expanded certifications.

Ensuring robust supplier qualification processes and maintaining compliance with international standards are most critical for pharmaceutical companies sourcing flecainide acetate. Strategic diversification, ongoing quality audits, and capacity assessments underpin sustainable procurement practices in this space.


Key Takeaways

  • Major Suppliers: Leading global suppliers include Teva, Aurobindo, Mylan, Hubei Hongyan, and Mizuho Pharma, with China and India serving as key manufacturing hubs.
  • Regulatory Standards: Prioritize suppliers with robust GMP certifications, especially US FDA, EMA, or WHO-GMP, to ensure product safety and compliance.
  • Cost vs. Quality: Emerging suppliers offer competitive pricing; however, thorough qualification processes are necessary to safeguard quality.
  • Supply Chain Risks: Diversify sourcing to mitigate disruptions and ensure reliable access to high-quality flecainide acetate.
  • Market Trends: Increased regulatory harmonization and regional API manufacturing are shaping the supply landscape, emphasizing the need for continuous supplier assessment.

FAQs

1. What are the primary regions producing flecainide acetate APIs?
China and India dominate API manufacturing for flecainide acetate, supported by increasing production capacities in North America and Europe.

2. How can a pharmaceutical company evaluate supplier reliability for flecainide acetate?
Assess supplier certifications (GMP, ISO), audit reports, active customer references, batch consistency data, and regulatory compliance records.

3. Are Chinese manufacturers of flecainide acetate reliable?
Many Chinese suppliers meet international GMP standards, but due diligence through audits and certification verification is essential due to variability in compliance.

4. What risks are associated with sourcing flecainide acetate from multiple suppliers?
Risks include variability in product quality, regulatory compliance discrepancies, and supply disruptions, which necessitate effective qualification procedures.

5. What future trends are influencing the flecainide acetate supply chain?
Regulatory harmonization, regional manufacturing growth, increased scrutiny on API quality, and supply chain resilience initiatives are presently shaping the landscape.


Sources:

  1. Market analysis and industry reports on API manufacturing.
  2. Company disclosures, certifications, and manufacturing capacity data.
  3. Regulatory agency guidelines (FDA, EMA, WHO).
  4. Industry news on API global supply chain developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.