You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for erythrocin


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


erythrocin

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Hospira ERYTHROCIN erythromycin lactobionate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 062638 ANDA Hospira, Inc. 0409-6476-44 10 VIAL, PATENT DELIVERY SYSTEM in 1 TRAY (0409-6476-44) / 100 mL in 1 VIAL, PATENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (0409-6476-54) 2006-03-16
Hospira ERYTHROCIN erythromycin lactobionate INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050609 NDA Hospira, Inc. 0409-6482-01 10 VIAL in 1 TRAY (0409-6482-01) / 10 mL in 1 VIAL (0409-6482-11) 2005-05-25
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Erythrocin

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Erythrocin, a well-established antibiotic designated as erythromycin, is commonly prescribed to treat various bacterial infections. As an integral component of infectious disease management, erythromycin’s supply chain influences global health outcomes, especially amidst increasing demand and supply chain disruptions. This article offers a detailed exploration of key suppliers for erythrocin, analyzing their manufacturing capacities, geographic distribution, regulatory considerations, and market impact to aid industry stakeholders in strategic decision-making.

Overview of Erythrocin (Erythromycin)

Erythrocin, primarily erythromycin estolate and erythromycin ethylsuccinate formulations, is classified as a macrolide antibiotic. Its broad-spectrum activity against gram-positive bacteria makes it essential in clinical practice, with applications spanning respiratory infections, skin conditions, and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The global demand for erythromycin persists, driven by its efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Global Manufacturing Landscape

The erythromycin supply ecosystem comprises several multinational pharmaceutical producers, regional generics manufacturers, and contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs). Key producers have established extensive manufacturing facilities across North America, Europe, Asia, and Latin America, collectively ensuring a steady supply.

Major Suppliers of Erythromycin (Erythrocin)

1. Pfizer Inc.

Overview:
Pfizer is among the primary patent holders and manufacturers of erythromycin formulations. Its global reach and robust R&D pipeline position it as a dominant supplier.

Manufacturing Capabilities:
Pfizer’s production plants in the U.S. and Europe adhere to stringent quality standards (FDA, EMA), facilitating high-volume output and reliable supply.

Market Strategy:
While primarily focused on branded erythromycin, Pfizer’s global presence supports distribution in both developed and emerging markets. The company maintains stockpiles and supply chains resilient to disruptions.

2. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

Overview:
Teva, a leading generic pharmaceutical company headquartered in Israel, supplies erythromycin in various dosage forms.

Manufacturing Capabilities:
With manufacturing facilities in Israel, India, and Europe, Teva produces erythromycin in formulations such as capsules and suspensions. Their cost-effective production makes them a key player in price-sensitive markets.

Regulatory Footprint:
Teva’s products are widely approved by regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, ensuring market diversity.

3. Mylan (Now part of Viatris)

Overview:
Viatris, resulting from Mylan and Pfizer’s generics division merger, supplies erythromycin as part of its broad antibiotics portfolio.

Manufacturing Capabilities:
Viatris operates production units across Europe, India, and North America, with stringent quality controls to meet international standards.

Market Focus:
Their focus targets both mature and emerging markets, emphasizing affordability and supply stability.

4. Lupin Limited

Overview:
An Indian pharmaceutical company, Lupin is a significant regional supplier, especially in Asia, Latin America, and Africa.

Manufacturing Capabilities:
Lupin produces erythromycin in multiple formulations, leveraging its extensive manufacturing infrastructure in India to meet regional demands.

Regulatory & Quality:
Lupin’s facilities are approved by global regulators, aligning product standards with international expectations.

5. Zambon Group

Overview:
An Italian-based, family-owned pharmaceutical manufacturer, Zambon supplies erythromycin globally.

Manufacturing Capabilities:
Zambon’s facilities in Italy and China produce high-quality erythromycin formulations, with a focus on Europe and Asia.

Market Position:
Zambon emphasizes quality and compliance, targeting both diverse markets and private-label partnerships.

6. Other Notable Suppliers

Additional regional players and CMOs contribute to erythromycin availability, including companies such as GSK (GlaxoSmithKline), Sun Pharmaceutical Industries (India), and Hikma Pharmaceuticals. These companies enhance supply diversity and mitigate risks linked to dependence on a few suppliers.

Regulatory and Supply Chain Considerations

Regulatory approvals from authorities like the FDA, EMA, and local agencies largely influence supplier capabilities. Manufacturing standards—including Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)—are prerequisites for market authorization, impacting the supply chain's robustness.

Global supply chain disruptions, exemplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, have underscored the importance of diversified sourcing. Many suppliers have invested in expanding capacities and establishing regional manufacturing hubs to ensure continued erythromycin availability.

Emerging Trends and Market Dynamics

  • Generic Dominance: The market for erythromycin is predominantly generic, with suppliers competing primarily on price and regulatory approval speed.
  • Supply Chain Resilience: Companies are building inventories, establishing multiple manufacturing sites, and collaborating across regions to reduce vulnerabilities.
  • Quality Assurance: Increased focus on compliance with global standards is shaping supplier reputation and market access.
  • Regulatory Environment: Stringent approvals and patent expirations impact supplier strategies, encouraging diversification and innovation.

Conclusion

The supply of erythrocin (erythromycin) hinges on a broad ecosystem of global manufacturers, ranging from multinational corporations to regional generics producers. Pfizer, Teva, Viatris, Lupin, and Zambon represent key suppliers that support worldwide demand. Ensuring supply chain resilience necessitates ongoing diversification, adherence to regulatory standards, and strategic partnerships amidst evolving market and regulatory landscapes.

Key Takeaways

  • Major erythromycin suppliers include Pfizer, Teva, Viatris (Mylan), Lupin, and Zambon.
  • Regional manufacturers play crucial roles, especially in Asia and Latin America, ensuring supply accessibility.
  • Regulatory approval and GMP compliance are critical factors influencing supplier reliability.
  • Supply chain disruptions emphasize the importance of diversified manufacturing bases and inventory strategies.
  • Industry trends favor increased capacity investments and regional production hubs to buffer against global uncertainties.

FAQs

1. What are the primary formulations of erythromycin supplied by leading manufacturers?
Leading manufacturers offer erythromycin in various formulations, including capsules, tablets, suspensions, and topical preparations, designed to meet diverse clinical needs and patient preferences.

2. How do regulatory agencies impact erythromycin suppliers?
Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA enforce quality standards and approve manufacturing facilities, directly influencing which suppliers can access international markets and ensuring medication safety.

3. What regional suppliers are significant in low- and middle-income countries?
Indian companies such as Lupin and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries are prominent regional suppliers, providing cost-effective erythromycin formulations primarily for African, Asian, and Latin American markets.

4. Are there ongoing supply chain risks for erythromycin?
Yes. Disruptions caused by geopolitical tensions, pandemics, or raw material shortages can affect production, emphasizing the need for diversified sourcing and strategic inventory management.

5. How is the market for erythromycin evolving amid antibiotic resistance concerns?
While erythromycin remains essential, rising resistance has prompted increased focus on stewardship and the development of alternative therapies, potentially influencing future demand and supplier strategies.


References

[1] World Health Organization. "The Essential Medicines List." WHO, 2022.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Erythromycin Drug Approval and Manufacturing Standards," FDA, 2023.
[3] Statista. "Global Antibiotics Market." 2023.
[4] Deloitte. "Pharmaceutical Industry Supply Chain Strategies," Deloitte Insights, 2022.
[5] IQVIA. "Global Prescription Drug Market Data," IQVIA, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.