Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for benicar


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


benicar

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Cosette BENICAR olmesartan medoxomil TABLET;ORAL 021286 NDA Cosette Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 0713-0860-30 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (0713-0860-30) 2022-09-01
Cosette BENICAR olmesartan medoxomil TABLET;ORAL 021286 NDA Cosette Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 0713-0861-30 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (0713-0861-30) 2022-09-01
Cosette BENICAR olmesartan medoxomil TABLET;ORAL 021286 NDA Cosette Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 0713-0862-30 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE, PLASTIC (0713-0862-30) 2022-09-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for benicar

Last updated: April 23, 2026

Who Supplies BENICAR (Olmesartan Medoxomil)?

What companies supply BENICAR’s active ingredient and key manufacturing inputs?

BENICAR is the brand for olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). The brand is marketed in the US by Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS). While BENICAR’s label identifies the marketing authorization holder and lists manufacturing sites, it typically does not name the underlying API and intermediate suppliers in a way that is complete for all global sources. The most actionable supply-chain view for BENICAR is therefore organized around: (1) finished-dose manufacturers shown on US labeling and (2) API manufacturers that appear in regulatory filings and related public datasets.

Finished-dose manufacturers listed for BENICAR (US label-facing supply) Product strength (US) Finished-dose manufacturing entities shown in publicly indexed labeling Typical role
BENICAR (olmesartan medoxomil) tablets Manufacturer list varies by strength and label revision (site and label updates) Finished-dose production / packaging release

Which suppliers are most visible for BENICAR through regulatory and labeling signals?

Publicly indexed sources for BENICAR supply typically surface suppliers under one of two patterns:

  • US labeling “Manufactured for / Distributed by” and manufacturing site statements, which identify the firms responsible for finished-dose manufacturing and release.
  • API manufacturer identifiers that appear in regulatory-linked datasets used by market intelligence providers (often via drug master files, DMFs, or supplier listings surfaced through inspections or filing extracts).

Best-evidence supplier set for BENICAR is “finished-dose manufacturers + API DMF-linked firms” rather than a single universal API vendor.


How does BENICAR’s supplier map affect R&D and investment decisions?

What supply-chain risks matter for BENICAR?

Risk vector Impact on BENICAR
Multi-site manufacturing Dose-level changes can shift supply among facilities without changing the product label identity
API-source turnover API sourcing changes can alter lead times and compounding schedules for generics and authorized generics
Regulatory inspection exposure A supplier under scrutiny can constrain capacity, driving volatility in certain strengths

What contracting structure is typical for an older, branded ARB like BENICAR?

  • Brand owner controls global commercial packaging and release strategy
  • Finished-dose manufacturing is executed by contract manufacturers at labeled sites
  • API supply is handled through DMF-linked qualified sources, often multiple vendors to support continuity

What supplier facts are available from BENICAR’s public brand presence?

Who is the brand/marketing authorization holder for BENICAR?

  • Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) markets BENICAR in the US.

Which public records typically identify BENICAR manufacturing suppliers?

  • US prescribing information (package insert) manufacturing statements
  • FDA drug labeling repositories and public drug databases
  • DMF-linked API supplier listings in regulatory-linked public datasets

Because BENICAR’s detailed manufacturing-site roster is strength- and revision-dependent, the supplier list must be taken from the specific US label version in force at the time of assessment.


Key Takeaways

  • BENICAR’s supplier network is best analyzed as brand owner (BMS) + labeled finished-dose manufacturers + DMF-linked API sources rather than a single named supplier.
  • The most decision-grade supplier data for BENICAR comes from US labeling manufacturing statements and regulatory-linked API source identifiers.
  • Supplier visibility is not uniform across strengths and changes with label revisions, so any procurement or investment view must map supply by strength and current label version.

FAQs

1) Who owns BENICAR?

Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS).

2) Who manufactures BENICAR tablets?

Finished-dose manufacturing is performed by entities named in BENICAR’s US labeling “manufactured for / manufacturing site” sections, with site lists that can differ by strength and label revision.

3) Who supplies the olmesartan medoxomil API?

Olsesartan medoxomil is supplied by API manufacturers that are typically linked via regulatory submissions (DMFs) and reflected in regulatory-linked supplier datasets; the API source set can include multiple qualified vendors.

4) Is the supplier list the same for every BENICAR strength?

No. Manufacturing site and release configurations can vary by strength and label revision.

5) Where do the most reliable supplier names come from?

From BENICAR US prescribing information manufacturing statements and regulatory-linked drug supply datasets.


Sources

[1] FDA. “Drug Label Information for BENICAR (olmesartan medoxomil).” FDA Access Data / labeling repositories.
[2] DailyMed. “BENICAR (olmesartan medoxomil) tablets, for oral use.” DailyMed prescribing information and label manufacturing sections.
[3] FDA. “Drugs@FDA: BENICAR (olmesartan medoxomil).” FDA Drugs@FDA database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.