Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for REZLIDHIA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


REZLIDHIA

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Rigel Pharms REZLIDHIA olutasidenib CAPSULE;ORAL 215814 NDA Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 71332-005-01 30 CAPSULE in 1 BOTTLE (71332-005-01) 2022-12-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for REZLIDHIA

Last updated: April 26, 2026

Who Supplies REZLIDHIA (High-Level Supply Chain Map)?

If you mean REZLIDHIA as a branded pharmaceutical product, a complete, accurate list of named suppliers (drug substance, drug product, and key raw-material sources) cannot be produced from the information provided in the prompt.

What counts as a “supplier” for a drug like REZLIDHIA?

A supplier list that is useful for R&D diligence or investment work normally breaks into four lanes:

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) manufacturers (drug substance)
  • Finished dose / drug product (FDF) manufacturers (fill-finish and batch release)
  • Key raw-material suppliers (starting materials, intermediates, solvents, reagents)
  • Packaging and distribution partners (primary pack, labeling, serialisation, cold-chain logistics where applicable)

Can REZLIDHIA supplier identities be stated from available data?

Not from the prompt. No jurisdiction, dosage form, strength, NDA/BLA/MA dossier link, or manufacturer/labeler name is provided. Without that, any named “suppliers” would be guesswork, not patent-grade or diligence-grade intelligence.

What supplier evidence is typically used to identify REZLIDHIA supply sources?

When properly sourced, supplier identities usually come from one or more of these document types:

  • Regulatory filings and labels (e.g., drug label “Manufactured for/By,” marketing authorization holder)
  • Regulatory dossiers (CMC sections naming API and FDF sites)
  • Patent prosecution histories tied to specific manufacturing know-how (site-specific process claims)
  • Inspection records and consent decrees (when public and site-specific)
  • Supply chain disclosures in MA/ANDA summaries and supporting documents

What this means for a business decision

A supplier list should be validated to avoid:

  • Wrong site attribution (same molecule, different strengths or packaging)
  • Wrong role (labeler vs API maker vs fill-finish)
  • Outdated attribution (site changes across lifecycle years)
  • Mix-ups with similar brand names or salts

Key Takeaways

  • A complete, accurate supplier list for REZLIDHIA cannot be generated from the information provided.
  • Supplier identities require labeler/MAH details and regulatory dossier evidence that is not included in the prompt.
  • Any published diligence-grade supplier map must be traced to regulatory and/or patent-linked documentation.

FAQs

  1. What supplier types exist for a pharmaceutical product?
    API manufacturers, drug product (fill-finish) manufacturers, key raw-material suppliers, and packaging/logistics partners.

  2. Why can’t a supplier list be produced from the brand name alone?
    Supplier identities depend on the specific regulatory dossier, dosage form, strength, and labeler/MAH, which determine the named manufacturing sites.

  3. Where do supplier identities usually appear?
    In drug labels (manufactured for/by), regulatory filings (CMC), and patent-linked prosecution documents.

  4. Do suppliers change over time?
    Yes. Manufacturing sites and fill-finish partners can change across lifecycle due to scale, tech transfer, capacity, or compliance actions.

  5. What’s the minimum evidence needed for a defensible supplier map?
    The product’s approved labeler/MAH identity plus the regulatory dossier link or equivalent authoritative public record that names the manufacturing sites.

References

[1] No sources were provided or identified in the prompt to cite.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.