Last Updated: June 23, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for PRIFTIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


PRIFTIN

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Sanofi Aventis Us PRIFTIN rifapentine TABLET;ORAL 021024 NDA sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC 0088-2102-24 3 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (0088-2102-24) / 8 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BLISTER PACK (0088-2102-01) 2017-02-08
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for PRIFTIN

Last updated: June 9, 2026

Priftin (rifapentine) suppliers: who manufactures the API, key finished-dose partners, and what supply risks matter

Priftin is the brand of rifapentine (oral drug) used primarily for tuberculosis treatment. Supplier identification depends on (1) the rifapentine API producer(s) and (2) the drug product (finished-dose) manufacturer(s) that hold the marketing authorization and supply the US market. Without specific regulatory or listing data for the exact Priftin strength and market (US vs. ex-US), a complete, accurate “who supplies what” map cannot be produced.

Who supplies the rifapentine API used in Priftin?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

What do API supplier findings normally come from?

For rifapentine, the most reliable supplier mapping in practice comes from:

  • Drug Master File (DMF) references and listed API holders supporting NDA/ANDA submissions
  • Contract manufacturing disclosures in regulatory filings
  • Component-level disclosures in inspection and import records
  • Public procurement and labeler/holder metadata tied to finished-dose NDCs

Which company manufactures Priftin finished tablets or capsules?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

What identifies the finished-dose manufacturer

Finished-dose manufacturers are typically shown in:

  • FDA label “Manufactured for/Distributed by” lines (US)
  • NDC labeler and applicant/holder identifiers
  • Regulatory product listings tied to the marketing authorization

What is the Priftin marketing authorization holder vs. the contract manufacturer?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

Why the distinction matters for procurement

  • The marketing authorization holder controls regulatory responsibility.
  • The contract manufacturer controls capacity, QC release, and component supply risk.
  • Procurement and substitution decisions hinge on both.

How many supply sources exist for rifapentine and Priftin dosage forms?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

What “many vs. single source” changes commercially

  • Single-source APIs raise lead-time and batch release risk.
  • Multi-source APIs can reduce shortages but may increase variability in impurity profiles that affect stability and comparability.

Are there alternative rifapentine suppliers that can replace Priftin supply?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

What to check for replacement capability

  • Whether alternative products use the same salt form, polymorph, and dosage strength
  • Whether they have different excipient systems that can impact bioavailability and manufacturing hold times

What supply chain risks affect Priftin availability in the US or EU?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

Risk factors that typically drive rifapentine shortages

  • API capacity constraints and raw material availability
  • Quality system findings at key sites
  • Regulatory holds impacting batch release
  • Logistics bottlenecks for high-activity anti-tuberculosis actives

What are the key regulatory listings that show Priftin suppliers?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

Listings that usually answer “who supplies”

  • FDA Orange Book entries (where applicable) for manufacturer/applicant context
  • Label “manufactured for” lines by strength and NDC
  • FDA NDC Directory data and associated labeler records

How does Priftin supply compare with competing TB regimens using rifamycin class drugs?

Answer: Not determinable from the information provided.

What a supplier comparison normally includes

  • API upstream producers and whether procurement is captive
  • Finished-dose CMOs and site diversification
  • Storage and distribution constraints by dosage format

Key Takeaways

  • A complete supplier map for Priftin requires specific regulatory/NDC and labeler/API DMF-linked data by market and strength.
  • The information provided is insufficient to produce a correct list of rifapentine API suppliers and Priftin finished-dose manufacturers.

FAQs

  1. How do I identify the API supplier for rifapentine in US filings?
  2. What does the NDC labeler field tell me about Priftin manufacturing sites?
  3. Where can I find Priftin “manufactured for” lines by strength and NDC?
  4. Does Priftin have multiple approved manufacturing sites in the same regulatory jurisdiction?
  5. How do supplier changes affect batch release, QC testing, and product availability?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. FDA NDC Directory. https://ndclist.com/ndc/
  3. FDA Drugs@FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.