Last Updated: June 26, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for ESTARYLLA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


ESTARYLLA

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Xiromed ESTARYLLA ethinyl estradiol; norgestimate TABLET;ORAL-28 090794 ANDA AvKARE 42291-553-84 3 CARTON in 1 CARTON (42291-553-84) / 1 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (42291-553-28) / 1 KIT in 1 BLISTER PACK 2020-04-20
Xiromed ESTARYLLA ethinyl estradiol; norgestimate TABLET;ORAL-28 090794 ANDA Bryant Ranch Prepack 63629-2349-1 3 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (63629-2349-1) / 1 KIT in 1 BLISTER PACK 2018-01-01
Xiromed ESTARYLLA ethinyl estradiol; norgestimate TABLET;ORAL-28 090794 ANDA Xiromed, LLC. 70700-119-85 3 BLISTER PACK in 1 CARTON (70700-119-85) / 1 KIT in 1 BLISTER PACK 2018-01-01
Xiromed ESTARYLLA ethinyl estradiol; norgestimate TABLET;ORAL-28 090794 ANDA Proficient Rx LP 82804-158-28 1 BLISTER PACK in 1 POUCH (82804-158-28) / 1 KIT in 1 BLISTER PACK 2018-01-01
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for ESTARYLLA

Last updated: June 2, 2026

ESTARYLLA Suppliers: Who manufactures, supplies, and distributes Estarylla (ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate) in the US?

Executive summary: Estarylla (ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate) is an FDA-approved combined oral contraceptive (COC). In the US supply chain, “suppliers” typically split into (1) the branded/marketing rights holder listed for the product in FDA systems, (2) finished-dosage manufacturers for Estarylla tablets, and (3) upstream API and excipient suppliers. Without specific FDA label/manufacturer-line items and the Orange Book listing details for the exact Estarylla strength(s) and NDCs, a complete, accurate supplier map cannot be produced.

Who is listed as the manufacturer or labeler for Estarylla (ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate)?

Featured snippet answer: The labeler/manufacturer details for Estarylla must be taken from FDA labeling (package insert “Manufactured for…” lines) and the FDA Orange Book listing for each Estarylla NDC/strength.

Which strength and NDC matter for Estarylla supplier attribution?

Estarylla exists across multiple presentations (tablet strengths and packaging configurations). Supplier identity can differ by:

  • Strength (EE/norgestimate dose)
  • Package type (count)
  • NDC (10- or 11-digit format)
  • Revision date of the label

What finished-dose manufacturers supply Estarylla tablets?

Featured snippet answer: Finished-dose manufacturing sites for Estarylla are identified in the product’s FDA labeling and Orange Book “Applicant” and “Manufacturer” fields for each NDC/strength.

How to trace finished-dose supply for Estarylla

A defensible finished-dose supplier map requires cross-checking:

  • FDA label “Manufactured by/for” and address lines
  • Orange Book listing associated with the same NDC
  • Any “site of manufacture” changes reflected in label revisions

Who supplies the active pharmaceutical ingredients for Estarylla (API: ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate)?

Featured snippet answer: Estarylla’s upstream API suppliers are not consistently published at the branded level; API vendor attribution is usually not public unless disclosed via:

  • FDA Drug Master Files (DMFs)
  • Procurement disclosures in company filings
  • Public regulatory submissions that enumerate DMF holders (not always indexed to the brand)

API sourcing differences that affect continuity

API suppliers can change due to:

  • DMF transitions
  • compliance and capacity constraints
  • requalification of commercial lots
  • site swaps approved via CBE-30 or PAS (depending on change type)

Which excipient and packaging suppliers are used for Estarylla?

Featured snippet answer: Excipient and packaging suppliers are generally not named in public FDA databases for branded oral contraceptives, but they can be inferred only from:

  • vendor qualification documents (not public)
  • supplier disclosures in regulatory submissions (often DMF/CMC-linked)
  • label “packaged by” and “distributed by” lines when available

What packaging formats are typically involved

COC supply chains use:

  • blister packaging or bottles
  • desiccant/induction seals where applicable
  • child-resistant and tamper-evident packaging variants

How can you identify Estarylla distributors and wholesale suppliers in the US?

Featured snippet answer: The public-facing distribution roles are usually captured as:

  • “Distributed by” lines on the label
  • wholesaler catalog entries tied to NDCs
  • GPO contract listings

Wholesale distribution is NDC-specific

Distribution partners can vary by:

  • NDC (even within the same strength)
  • region and contract structure
  • inventory and substitution rules

What supplier risks affect Estarylla availability (capacity, recalls, shortages)?

Featured snippet answer: Estarylla availability risk typically tracks:

  • manufacturing site capacity and sterility/non-sterility line constraints (COCs are non-sterile)
  • tablet compression coating line availability
  • packaging line constraints
  • regulatory action affecting a specific NDC strength/manufacturing site

Where shortage signals appear

Public shortage signals are typically communicated through:

  • FDA Drug Shortages database (for finished product)
  • voluntary manufacturer communications
  • state-level pharmacy alerts (less consistent)

Which companies supply competing generics for ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate COCs versus Estarylla?

Featured snippet answer: Competitor supplier sets are inferred from generic manufacturers for each AB-rated product sharing the same active ingredients and dosage form (tablet). A precise comparison requires NDC-level Orange Book listing for each competitor.

Generic entry can shift the supplier landscape

When generic and authorized generics launch, finished-dose manufacturing and distribution rotate through:

  • multiple generic applicants
  • contract manufacturers
  • alternate packaging configurations

How does Estarylla’s supplier chain compare with other EE/norgestimate brands?

Featured snippet answer: Other EE/norgestimate COCs may share upstream API supply but often differ at:

  • finished-dose manufacturing sites
  • packaging vendors
  • distributor/labeler names

Most comparable dimension for procurement

Procurement teams benchmark:

  • tablet manufacturing site
  • batch-release testing sites
  • packaging line sites
  • regulatory inspection history per site (CMC compliance)

Key Takeaways

  • Estarylla supplier identification must be grounded in NDC- and strength-specific FDA label and Orange Book listing fields.
  • Public sources rarely disclose upstream API/excipient vendor names at the branded level.
  • A complete supplier map requires manufacturer “site of manufacture” and labeler/distributor lines for each Estarylla NDC, plus Orange Book applicant/manufacturer linkage.

FAQs

  1. Does Estarylla’s labeler change by NDC or strength?
  2. How do DMFs link to the API suppliers for ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate?
  3. Can the same finished-dose manufacturer produce multiple COCs with shared packaging lines?
  4. What information on FDA labels helps identify “distributed by” vs “manufactured for”?
  5. How should procurement teams assess Estarylla manufacturing site risk during shortage periods?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (n.d.). FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. FDA Drug Shortages. (n.d.). FDA. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/drugshortages/
  3. FDA Labeling (DailyMed). (n.d.). National Library of Medicine. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.