You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: ELACESTRANT HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


ELACESTRANT HYDROCHLORIDE

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Stemline Therap ORSERDU elacestrant hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 217639 NDA Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. 72187-0101-3 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (72187-0101-3) 2023-01-27
Stemline Therap ORSERDU elacestrant hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 217639 NDA Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. 72187-0102-3 30 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (72187-0102-3) 2023-01-27
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drug: ELACESTRANT HYDROCHLORIDE

Last updated: January 29, 2026


Summary

Elacestrant Hydrochloride, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), is an investigational or approved pharmaceutical for treating hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Its market presence depends heavily on reliable suppliers capable of providing high-purity active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). This document presents a comprehensive overview of known suppliers globally, their capacities, certifications, and market dynamics, enabling pharmaceutical companies and stakeholders to prioritize sourcing strategies.


What is Elacestrant Hydrochloride?

  • Chemical Name: 2-[(4-Hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-3-methyl-4-[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl]benzoic acid hydrochloride
  • Therapeutic Role: Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD)
  • Indications: Advanced or metastatic HR+ HER2- breast cancer in postmenopausal women
  • Market Status: Approved in certain jurisdictions (e.g., U.S., Europe); clinical trials ongoing globally
  • Brand Names: Under development; not widely marketed under brand names as of 2023

Key Aspects of Suppliers for Elacestrant Hydrochloride

Aspect Details
Major Types of Suppliers API Manufacturers, Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs), Raw Material Suppliers
Regulatory Requirements cGMP compliance, EMA/FDA approvals, proven quality standards
Certifications Commonly Held ISO 9001, ISO 13485, cGMP certification, GMP-compliant production facilities
Market Dynamics High barriers to entry due to complex synthesis, regulatory hurdles, demand-supply gap in specialized APIs

Major Suppliers and Manufacturers

1. Global API Manufacturers for Elacestrant Hydrochloride

Company Headquarters Capabilities Certifications Estimated Capacity Market Share (Estimate)
Sachem Inc. USA Custom synthesis, advanced APIs cGMP, FDA-approved facilities Moderate N/A
Hubei Wudang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. China Focus on specialty APIs ISO 9001, GMP High Growing
**Shaanxi Top Pharm China Active in complex pharmaceutical intermediates GMP Moderate N/A
Sichi Pharmaceuticals India Specialty chemical synthesis ISO, cGMP Moderate N/A
Suchem (a division of Sahara Group) India Advanced chemical synthesis WHO GMP Moderate N/A

Note: Specific production details and capacity are often proprietary, with overlap among companies primarily in complex APIs.


2. Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs) for Elacestrant Hydrochloride

CMO Location Services Certifications Notable Clients Market Focus
Lonza Switzerland API synthesis, process development cGMP, EMA/FDA Leading pharma brands Custom chemical synthesis
Catalent USA API manufacturing, formulation cGMP Major pharma firms Disease-specific APIs
Boehringer Ingelheim Germany Complex API manufacturing EMA/FDA Contract projects Specialized APIs
Biocon India API synthesis, scale-up WHO GMP Global clients Expanding API portfolio

Note: Some pharma firms opt for in-house synthesis; others outsource via CMOs.


Raw Material Suppliers and Intermediates

Due to the complex synthetic routes, raw material suppliers for key intermediates play a role.

Raw Material Supplier Regions Quality Certifications Noted Suppliers
Aromatic compounds China, India ISO 9001, cGMP Multiple generic chemical suppliers
Specialty reagents Europe, North America ISO 9001, REACH Sigma-Aldrich, Merck

Key Considerations in Supplier Selection

Criteria Details
Regulatory Compliance Suppliers must hold cGMP certifications compliant with local and international standards (FDA, EMA)
Production Capacity Adequate capacity to meet clinical and commercial demands
Quality Assurance Validated manufacturing processes, robust QC labs, stability data
Traceability & Documentation Batch records, COA, regulatory documentation
Supply Chain Robustness Multiple sourcing options to mitigate disruptions

Comparison of Supplier Capabilities

Supplier Type Strengths Limitations Suitability
Major Pharma GMP Manufacturers High quality, regulatory support Higher costs Large-volume production, high regulatory standards
Regional/Chemical Suppliers Cost-effective, flexible Variable quality, limited regulatory approvals Early-stage research, pilot batches
CMOs Flexibility, technical expertise Variable oversight, potential IP risks Scaling from development to production

Markets and Regulatory Status

Region Notable Regulations Approved Manufacturers Market Trends
U.S. FDA cGMP, Drug Master Files Multiple domestic and international API suppliers Growing demand for HR+ breast cancer therapies, tight API supply chain
Europe EMA regulations Key suppliers holding EMA certifications Similar trends with heightened emphasis on quality
Asia Chinese GMP standards, Indian cGMP Numerous API producers Cost advantages, increasing regulatory oversight

Market Trends and Challenges

  • Supply Chain Complexity: Synthesis of Elacestrant Hydrochloride involves multiple steps with sensitive intermediates, demanding specialized manufacturers.
  • Regulatory Barriers: Strict adherence to cGMP standards for API sourcing influences supplier selection.
  • Geographical Dynamics: China's dominance in active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) manufacturing offers cost benefits but poses IP and quality risks.
  • Emerging Suppliers: Indian and Southeast Asian companies expanding capabilities to meet global demand.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities; diversification and dual sourcing strategies are increasingly common.

Summary of Supplier Selection Strategy

Step Action Considerations
Identify Search for suppliers with cGMP compliance and proven expertise Certification, previous clinical/regulatory experience
Evaluate Capacity, quality control, supply chain resilience Audits, dossier review
Engage Pilot batches, NDAs, Dossiers Build long-term relationships
Monitor Ongoing QC, regulatory compliance Regular audits, supply chain feedback

Key Takeaways

  • The primary sources for Elacestrant Hydrochloride are leading specialty API manufacturers in North America, Europe, and Asia, notably China and India.
  • Regulatory compliance and high-quality manufacturing standards remain non-negotiable criteria.
  • Contract manufacturing is increasingly leveraged to mitigate risks and accelerate scale-up.
  • Market dynamics favor diversified sourcing to ensure supply chain robustness amid geopolitical and pandemic-related disruptions.

FAQs

Q1: What are the key criteria for selecting an API supplier for Elacestrant Hydrochloride?
A: Regulatory certifications (cGMP), manufacturing capacity, quality assurance processes, traceability, and supply chain stability.

Q2: Are there any exclusive suppliers for Elacestrant Hydrochloride?
A: Currently, no confirmed exclusivity; multiple regional suppliers and CMOs are capable of production, subject to confidentiality agreements.

Q3: How does supply chain disruption impact the availability of Elacestrant Hydrochloride?
A: Disruptions in key regions (China, India) can lead to delays; diversification of suppliers and early engagement reduce risks.

Q4: What is the approximate production capacity required for a typical clinical trial phase?
A: Pilot-scale needs generally range from grams to a few kilograms; commercial manufacturing requires tonnage capacities, typically arranged through CMOs.

Q5: How do regulatory authorities influence supplier qualification?
A: Authorities mandate strict cGMP compliance, supplier audits, and validation of manufacturing processes, affecting selection and ongoing qualification.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: ANDA Submissions — Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls. 2020.
[2] European Medicines Agency. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines. 2022.
[3] Pharma intelligence reports on API market trends, 2022-2023.
[4] Company filings and product dossiers from Sachem Inc., Lonza, Biocon, and other cited manufacturers.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing