You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Suppliers and packagers for generic pharmaceutical drug: DICLOFENAC SODIUM; MISOPROSTOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


DICLOFENAC SODIUM; MISOPROSTOL

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Pfizer ARTHROTEC diclofenac sodium; misoprostol TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 020607 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0025-1411-60 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0025-1411-60) 1997-12-24
Pfizer ARTHROTEC diclofenac sodium; misoprostol TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 020607 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0025-1411-90 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0025-1411-90) 1997-12-24
Pfizer ARTHROTEC diclofenac sodium; misoprostol TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 020607 NDA Pfizer Laboratories Div Pfizer Inc 0025-1421-60 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (0025-1421-60) 1997-12-24
Pfizer ARTHROTEC diclofenac sodium; misoprostol TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 020607 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. 59762-0028-1 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (59762-0028-1) 2012-11-01
Pfizer ARTHROTEC diclofenac sodium; misoprostol TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 020607 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. 59762-0028-2 90 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (59762-0028-2) 2012-11-01
Pfizer ARTHROTEC diclofenac sodium; misoprostol TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 020607 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. 59762-0029-1 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (59762-0029-1) 2012-11-01
Pfizer ARTHROTEC diclofenac sodium; misoprostol TABLET, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 020607 NDA AUTHORIZED GENERIC Advanced Rx Pharmacy of Tennessee, LLC 80425-0272-1 60 TABLET, FILM COATED in 1 BOTTLE (80425-0272-1) 2024-02-23
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers for the Pharmaceutical Drugs: Diclofenac Sodium and Misoprostol

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape for critical drugs such as diclofenac sodium and misoprostol involves a complex global supply chain comprising manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors. These drugs serve essential roles: diclofenac sodium as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for pain and inflammation, and misoprostol for preventing gastrointestinal ulcers caused by NSAID therapy, as well as its use in abortion and labor induction. Understanding the suppliers of these compounds is crucial for pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers, regulators, and investors to ensure supply security, regulatory compliance, and competitive advantage. This analysis offers a comprehensive overview of current key suppliers, manufacturing hubs, and supply chain dynamics related to diclofenac sodium and misoprostol.


Global Suppliers of Diclofenac Sodium

1. Major Chemical and API Manufacturers

a. Mylan (now part of Viatris)
A leading global producer, Mylan supplies active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), including diclofenac sodium, with manufacturing facilities across India, Netherlands, and the United States. Their extensive API portfolio and capacity have cemented their position as a primary supplier, especially for generic formulations.

b. Aarti Industries Ltd. (India)
Aarti Industries is a prominent Indian API manufacturer with a robust portfolio, including diclofenac sodium. Their manufacturing facilities in India are compliant with international standards, including WHO-GMP and US FDA regulations, which facilitate exports to regulated markets.

c. Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (China)
One of the notable Chinese API suppliers, Hisun manufactures diclofenac sodium, favoring flexibility to meet global demand amid competitive pricing.

d. EIPICO (Egyptian International Pharmaceutical Industries Co.)
EIPICO produces APIs including diclofenac sodium, serving Middle Eastern, African, and European markets, supported by ISO and GMP certifications.

2. Regional Considerations

Indian and Chinese manufacturers dominate the diclofenac sodium supply chain due to cost advantages, manufacturing capacity, and established export channels. Regulatory compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) is critical for API approval and market access.


Suppliers of Misoprostol

1. Primary API Manufacturers

a. Farmanguinhos (Instituto de Tecnologia em Fármacos, Brazil)
Farmanguinhos, linked to Fiocruz, has been a longstanding supplier of misoprostol, especially for markets in Latin America and Africa. They produce generic misoprostol conforming with WHO standards.

b. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (India)
A significant player in the global generics market, Dr. Reddy’s supplies misoprostol API, with manufacturing plants approved by US FDA and EMA. Their global distribution network enhances availability for reproductive health and ulcer prevention therapies.

c. Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (China)
As with diclofenac, Hisun also produces misoprostol API, leveraging cost efficiencies and a broad export footprint.

d. Mylan (Viatris)
Mylan’s API manufacturing capabilities extend to misoprostol, supporting their extensive product line for reproductive health medications.

2. Regulatory and Quality Standards

Suppliers of misoprostol must adhere to strict GMP guidelines, especially considering its sensitive use in gynecological indications. Importantly, some suppliers have obtained WHO prequalification, facilitating procurement by UN agencies and NGOs.


Key Manufacturing Hubs and Regional Dynamics

India and China as Leading API Hubs

The dominance of India and China in API manufacturing stems from cost-effective production, extensive capacity, and established export infrastructure. Both countries have invested heavily in GMP compliance, with numerous facilities achieving certifications from US FDA, EMA, and WHO.

Regulatory Impact

Regulatory approvals significantly influence supplier choice. Suppliers holding WHO prequalification, US FDA approval, or EMA certification are preferred by manufacturers aiming to meet global standards. The evolving regulatory landscape, especially post-TRIPS agreements, promotes transparency and compliance, impacting supplier selection and supply chain reliability.


Supply Chain Challenges and Opportunities

Supply Chain Disruptions

  • Regulatory Compliance: Variances in GMP standards across regions can limit market access for some suppliers.
  • Geopolitical Tensions: Trade restrictions and tariffs influence sourcing decisions, especially involving China and India.
  • Quality Control: Ensuring API quality and purity remains critical, with counterfeit or substandard APIs risking supply chain integrity.

Opportunities

  • Diversification of Suppliers: To mitigate risks, pharmaceutical firms are expanding their supplier networks globally.
  • Local Manufacturing Expansion: Countries increasingly incentivize local API production to reduce reliance on imports, thereby securing supply chains.
  • Biopharmaceutical Innovation: Development of synthetic and biotechnological alternatives may eventually alter traditional API sourcing paradigms.

Conclusion

The sourcing of diclofenac sodium and misoprostol relies predominantly on Indian and Chinese pharmaceutical API producers, supported by regional manufacturers in Brazil and Egypt. Leading global companies such as Mylan, Dr. Reddy’s, and Zhejiang Hisun dominate the supply chain, leveraging GMP-compliant facilities and extensive export capabilities. Regulatory adherence, geopolitical factors, and supply chain resilience are key considerations for stakeholders. Diversifying supplier bases and strengthening quality assurance processes will remain vital for uninterrupted access to these critical medicines.


Key Takeaways

  • Indian and Chinese API manufacturers dominate the diclofenac sodium and misoprostol supply chain due to cost and capacity advantages.
  • Regulatory compliance, including WHO prequalification and USFDA approval, critically influences supplier credibility and market access.
  • Geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions highlight the need for diversification and strategic sourcing.
  • Growing regional manufacturing initiatives aim to bolster supply stability and reduce dependency on imports.
  • Companies should prioritize suppliers with robust quality standards and transparent supply chain practices to ensure drug safety and regulatory compliance.

FAQs

1. Who are the leading manufacturers of diclofenac sodium?
India's Aarti Industries and Mylan (Viatris) are among the top global diclofenac sodium API producers, supported by Chinese firms like Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical.

2. Which suppliers are most recognized for high-quality misoprostol API?
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories and Farmanguinhos hold notable certifications and WHO prequalification, ensuring high-quality misoprostol API supply.

3. How do regulatory standards affect API supplier choices?
Regulatory approvals such as US FDA, EMA, and WHO prequalification determine market access, with compliant suppliers favored for their quality assurance and global reach.

4. Are there regional efforts to boost API manufacturing for these drugs?
Yes, India and China continue investing in expanding API production capacity, and some countries are promoting local manufacturing to enhance supply security.

5. What are the primary risks in the API supply chain for these drugs?
Risks include regulatory non-compliance, geopolitical tensions, supply chain disruptions, and quality inconsistencies, all of which can impact drug availability.


Sources:
[1] Pharma Intelligence, "Global API Suppliers," 2022.
[2] WHO Prequalification Program, "List of Approved APIs," 2023.
[3] US FDA Drug Establishments Service Database, 2023.
[4] Industry Reports on API Manufacturing, 2022.
[5] Company Annual Reports and Certifications, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.