Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Suppliers and packagers for ANZUPGO


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


ANZUPGO

Listed suppliers include manufacturers, repackagers, relabelers, and private labeling entitities.

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA NDA/ANDA Supplier Package Code Package Marketing Start
Leo Pharma As ANZUPGO delgocitinib CREAM;TOPICAL 219155 NDA LEO Pharma, Inc 50222-280-30 1 TUBE in 1 CARTON (50222-280-30) / 30 g in 1 TUBE 2025-07-24
Leo Pharma As ANZUPGO delgocitinib CREAM;TOPICAL 219155 NDA LEO Pharma, Inc 50222-280-91 1 TUBE in 1 CARTON (50222-280-91) / 15 g in 1 TUBE 2025-07-24
Leo Pharma As ANZUPGO delgocitinib CREAM;TOPICAL 219155 NDA LEO Pharma, Inc 50222-280-99 1 TUBE in 1 CARTON (50222-280-99) / 5 g in 1 TUBE 2025-07-24
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >NDA/ANDA >Supplier >Package Code >Package >Marketing Start

Suppliers and packagers for ANZUPGO

Last updated: May 6, 2026

Who Supplies Anzupgo?

What is Anzupgo and what does the supply chain likely include?

No complete, authoritative public dataset is available in the provided information to identify: (1) the branded manufacturer/market authorization holder for “Anzupgo,” (2) its labeled dosage forms and strengths, and (3) its contract manufacturing organization (CMO), contract development manufacturing organization (CDMO), or active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) supplier list.

Without those anchors, any supplier naming would be speculative and risk misidentifying the wrong product, salt form, strength, or jurisdictional variant.

Which supplier categories must be verified for a correct supplier map?

A defensible supplier map for a marketed pharmaceutical brand typically requires verification of all of the following:

Supply-chain node What must be identified Where it is usually disclosed
Market authorization holder (MAH) / brand owner Legal entity responsible for the product Product label, regulatory filings, FDA/EMA/NMPA labels, company product pages
API supplier Site(s) and legal entity supplying the API (or intermediate) DMFs/CEP dossiers, inspection reports, EUDRACT/CEP references, label/manufacturer statements
Finished-dose manufacturer (FDF) Site(s) that manufacture tablets/capsules/injectables Product label section “Manufactured for/ by,” regulatory product monographs
Packaging/secondary manufacturing Filling, labeling, blistering/cartoning Label manufacturing statements; site lists in regulatory dossiers
Logistics/distribution partners Storage and distribution entities Wholesale/wholesaler and country distribution listings; sometimes label/distributor line items
Quality testing labs Release/stability testing labs Site disclosures in regulatory dossiers; sometimes in batch release references

What can be concluded from the information provided?

Only one actionable conclusion is possible: the necessary identifiers to map suppliers for “anzupgo” are not present. That makes it impossible to produce a complete and accurate supplier list.

Key Takeaways

  • A supplier list for Anzupgo requires product identity confirmation (MAH, strength, dosage form, jurisdiction) and regulatory/label-linked manufacturing statements.
  • No such verified source-linked product identity is provided here, so a correct supplier map cannot be generated from the available information.

FAQs

  1. Can I list API suppliers for Anzupgo without the MAH and strength/dosage form?
    No. Supplier responsibility and even the API form can differ by jurisdiction, strength, or salt/polymorph.

  2. Do labels always list the API supplier?
    Rarely. Labels most often disclose the finished-dose manufacturer and the MAH, not the API source.

  3. Where is the most reliable supplier evidence usually found?
    Regulatory product labels/SmPCs and dossier-linked documents (DMF/CEP/inspection-related publications), not marketing pages.

  4. Can one CMO make multiple strengths under the same brand?
    Yes. But the correct mapping is dossier- and site-specific, so it must be tied to the exact marketed presentation.

  5. Is “Anzupgo” necessarily a single global product?
    Brands often vary by country formulation, labeling, and manufacturer assignments, so supplier lists must be jurisdiction-specific.

References

[1] No cited sources were provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.