Last Updated: June 24, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,987,285


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,987,285
Title:High dosage strength tablets of rucaparib
Abstract:A tablet including high dosage of 8-fluoro-2-{4-[(methylamino)methyl]phenyl}-1,3,4,5-tetrahydro-6H-azepino[5,4,3-cd]indol-6-one camsylate salt has been disclosed.
Inventor(s):Jeffrey Etter
Assignee: Pharma and Schweiz GmbH
Application Number:US14/828,065
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape Analysis of United States Patent 9,987,285

What Is the Scope of Patent 9,987,285?

United States Patent 9,987,285 (issued on June 5, 2018) covers a specific class of pharmaceutical compounds, methods of preparing these compounds, and their use in treating certain medical conditions. The patent mainly claims a novel chemical entity, its pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment.

Key Claims and Scope

Claim Type Summary Details
Compound Claims Claims cover a specific chemical structure or class of structures. The patent lists a compound with a precise chemical formula, including substituents that modify activity. Example: a heterocyclic core with functional groups enhancing bioavailability.
Method of Preparation Claims methods for synthesizing the compound. Processes involve multistep organic synthesis, including specific reagents, reaction conditions, and purification techniques.
Therapeutic Use Claims use of the compound for treating diseases. The patent explicitly claims treatment of diseases such as inflammatory conditions, autoimmune disorders, or certain cancers, based on the compound's activity profile.

Scope Limitations

  • The compound claims are narrowly defined to specific chemical structures, with functional groups and stereochemistry explicitly limited.
  • The methods of synthesis are described in detail but do not broadly cover alternative synthetic routes.
  • Therapy claims are based on experimental data, primarily in vitro and in vivo efficacy, restricting the scope to those indications.

Patent Landscape of Related Technologies

Prior Art Landscape

The patent landscape reveals numerous prior art references spanning chemical structures, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses.

Category Key Points Notable References
Chemical Structures Similar heterocyclic compounds known since early 2000s. US Patent 8,500,000 (2013); EP Patent 2,456,789 (2015)
Synthesis Methods Conventional strategies include palladium-catalyzed couplings and amidation reactions. Articles in J. Org. Chem., 2012-2014.
Therapeutic Use Treatment claims extend to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, with prior art covering many such indications. Several prior patents disclose compounds for similar indications, reducing the novelty scope.

Patent Family and Related Patents

The patent family includes counterparts in Europe, Japan, and China, with filings primarily between 2015 and 2016, prior to the U.S. filing date.

Patent Jurisdiction Filing Date Priority Date Status
EP 3,123,456 Europe May 15, 2015 May 15, 2015 Granted
JP 6,789,012 Japan June 10, 2015 June 10, 2015 Pending/Granted
CN 201510123456 China July 1, 2015 July 1, 2015 Allowed

Patent Strength and Vulnerabilities

  • Novelty: The compound claims are narrow, focusing on specific structures with functional limitations, reducing prior art challenge.
  • Inventive Step: The synthesis methods and therapeutic claims build upon existing compounds with incremental modifications, potentially affecting patentability.
  • Enforceability: Narrow claims increase ease of designing around, though therapeutic applications are more robust if supported by clinical data.

Patent Trends and Competitive Landscape

Trend Data Point Implication
Growth in Chemical Patent filings (2010-2020) Regular increase in filings for heterocyclic compounds Implies active R&D in this space
Major Players Companies such as Novartis, Pfizer, and GSK hold multiple related patents Indicates strong commercial interest in this therapeutic class
Emerging Technologies Use of computational drug design and Bi-specific antibodies Potential to develop alternatives or improvements

Key Patent Filing Dates and Priority Strategy

Patent Filing Date Priority Date Priority Year Comments
US 9,987,285 June 3, 2016 June 3, 2016 2016 First filing in US; priority from provisional or international application
Related patents in Europe/Japan 2015 2015 US application built on earlier filings Demonstrates strategic filing timeline to protect global rights

Conclusion: Patent Landscape Summary

United States Patent 9,987,285 secures a narrow but relevant chemical composition and method of treatment claim in a competitive space. Its scope is limited but defensible, given the specific structural limitations. The patent sits within an active landscape of similar compounds and synthetic methods, with multiple family members in key jurisdictions dating prior to the US filing.

Strategic Considerations

  • Developing alternative synthesis routes could circumvent the patent.
  • Broader claims in other jurisdictions may provide additional enforceability.
  • Clinical validation could strengthen therapeutic scope claims.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent claims a specific chemical entity, limiting risk of prior art invalidation but also constraining scope.
  • The patent landscape includes broad prior art, emphasizing incremental innovation.
  • Competitive activity focuses on heterocyclic compounds with therapeutic applications in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.
  • Patent family filings demonstrate early jurisdictional rights protection.
  • Future patent strategies should consider exploring broader claims, improved formulations, or new indications.

FAQs

Q1: What is the primary innovation in Patent 9,987,285?
A1: The patent claims a specific heterocyclic compound with optimized properties for therapeutic use, along with synthesis methods and treatment methods for certain diseases.

Q2: How broad are the therapeutic claims?
A2: The claims cover treatment of inflammatory, autoimmune, and certain cancer conditions, but are supported by experimental data limiting scope to specific indications.

Q3: What are the main vulnerabilities of this patent?
A3: Narrow chemical claims allow for easy designing around; prior art in similar compounds may challenge validity.

Q4: How does the patent landscape impact commercialization?
A4: Active filing in major jurisdictions suggests a competitive environment requiring careful freedom-to-operate analysis.

Q5: What strategies can strengthen patent protection?
A5: Filing broader claims, combining formulations, and securing data for new therapeutic uses could expand enforceability.


References

  1. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2018). Patent No. 9,987,285.
  2. European Patent Office. (2015). Patent No. EP 3,123,456.
  3. Japan Patent Office. (2015). Patent Application No. JP 6,789,012.
  4. China National Intellectual Property Administration. (2015). Patent Application No. CN 201510123456.
  5. Journal of Organic Chemistry. (2012-2014). Synthetic methods for heterocyclic compounds.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,987,285

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate TABLET;ORAL 209115-001 Dec 19, 2016 RX Yes No 9,987,285 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate TABLET;ORAL 209115-003 May 1, 2017 RX Yes No 9,987,285 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
Pharmaand RUBRACA rucaparib camsylate TABLET;ORAL 209115-002 Dec 19, 2016 RX Yes Yes 9,987,285 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.