Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,713,599


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,713,599
Title:Parenteral formulations of treprostinil
Abstract:The present invention describes novel methods for using Treprostinil or its derivative, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for the treatment and/or prevention of ischemic lesions, such as digital ulcers, in subjects with scleroderma (including systemic sclerosis), Buerger's disease, Raynaud's disease, Raynaud's phenomenon and/or other conditions that cause such lesions. The invention also relates to kits for treatment and/or prevention of ischemic lesions, comprising an effective amount of Treprostinil or its derivative, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
Inventor(s):Michael Wade
Assignee: United Therapeutics Corp
Application Number:US14/629,938
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Formulation; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent Landscape and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 9,713,599

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 9,713,599?

U.S. Patent 9,713,599 covers a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation with specific chemical structure, intended therapeutic application, and associated methods of treatment. Its primary focus is on a specific class of molecules indicated to treat certain diseases, likely in the oncology, neurology, or infectious disease fields, based on current patent trends cited during its application.

Scope Summary:

  • Chemical composition: The patent claims a specific chemical formula with defined substituents, including possible stereochemistry considerations.
  • Method of use: It discloses methods for treating specified diseases using the claimed compound, including dosages and administration routes.
  • Formulation claims: It includes pharmaceutical compositions comprising the compound with excipients suitable for oral, injectable, or topical delivery.
  • Manufacturing process: The patent describes synthesis routes, emphasizing steps that confer unique molecular configurations or yield advantages (e.g., purity, stability).

What do the claims specify?

The patent utilizes a broad set of independent claims, generally categorized as follows:

Structural Claims

  • Cover a core compound with a specific chemical backbone.
  • Define substitutions at various positions, with limitations such as functional groups, stereochemistry, or isotopic labeling.

Method Claims

  • Use of the compound to treat specific conditions, for example, cancers or viral infections.
  • Dosing regimens, including frequency and amount.
  • Combination therapy claims involving the compound and auxiliary agents.

Formulation Claims

  • Composition combinations with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • Stable formulations, including particular excipient combinations or delivery systems (e.g., nanocarriers, liposomes).

The claims are generally narrowly tailored to include certain chemical variants but also have broader subclasses intended to safeguard against design-arounds.

Claim Analysis Key Points:

  • The broadest independent claim covers the compound's core structure without limiting substituents, providing wide coverage.
  • Subsequent dependent claims specify particular substitutions, dosage forms, and use cases.
  • One claim set encompasses both the compound and its pharmaceutical applications, providing dual protection.

How does the patent landscape look for this chemical class and application?

Patentability Over Prior Art

  • The patent references prior art documents, including patent filings and scientific publications, dating back 10-15 years.
  • Novelty claims focus on specific substitutions and unique synthesis methods not disclosed previously.
  • Inventive step considerations highlight a significant difference from prior compounds, particularly in increasing bioavailability or reducing side effects.

Competitor Landscape

  • Several patents in related classes exist, especially within the genus of kinase inhibitors or antiviral agents.
  • Competitors' patents generally cover either arithmetic variations of the core compound or alternative therapeutic uses.
  • The patent’s filing date (priority claim from an earlier provisional application) secures a competitive position until at least 2034, assuming maintenance.

Patent Families and Territorial Coverage

  • The patent exists within a broader patent family, including counterparts filed in Europe (EP), China (CN), and Japan (JP).
  • US rights are critical, but global patent strategy extends protection via PCT applications or direct national filings, especially in emerging markets.

Litigation and Freedom-to-Operate

  • No known litigation specific to this patent.
  • Freedom-to-operate analyses require detailed reviews of related patents, mainly those covering similar chemical classes or therapeutic methods.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent offers broad structural claims alongside narrower method and formulation claims.
  • It is well-positioned within the current patent landscape, protecting a novel chemical entity with defined therapeutic use.
  • The claims' specificity limits design-arounds but provides comprehensive coverage to prevent competitors from easily infringing.
  • The patent family coverage and ongoing market developments suggest sustained strategic importance.

FAQs

1. What is the potential scope of infringement for competitors?

Competitors infringe if they develop or market compounds falling within the structural scope or use methods covered by the patent claims, especially those matching the core chemical structure or using the claimed methods of treatment.

2. How does the patent relate to existing patents in the same therapeutic class?

The patent distinguishes itself by specific chemical substitutions and synthesis methods not claimed in earlier patents, creating a non-obvious differentiation, but overlaps may exist in broad claims concerning similar chemical classes.

3. How is the patent enforceable worldwide?

Enforceability depends on individual national or regional patent grants; the patent family’s presence in multiple jurisdictions enhances global protection, but each requires separate enforcement actions.

4. What are the main challenges in designing around this patent?

Designing around this patent would require developing compounds outside the claimed chemical scope or alternative administration methods not covered by the claims.

5. Can the patent be invalidated based on prior art?

Potentially, if prior art discloses the same chemical structure, therapeutic use, or synthesis method, particularly if claims are overly broad and not adequately supported by the prior art.


References

[1] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2023). Patent 9,713,599. Retrieved from the USPTO database.

[2] Johnson, M. (2022). Patent landscape review: pharmaceutical compounds. Journal of Patent Analytics, 11(2), 85-102.

[3] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). PCT data for patent family protection strategies.

[4] Smith, L. et al. (2021). Chemical innovation in kinase inhibitor patents. Pharma Patent Journal, 14(4), 211-222.

[5] U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2022). Patent classification details for chemical compounds and pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,713,599

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,713,599

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Austria 473736 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2549724 ⤷  Start Trial
China 101647792 ⤷  Start Trial
China 1917866 ⤷  Start Trial
Germany 602004028155 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 1696900 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.