You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Details for Patent: 9,670,492


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,670,492
Title:Modulation of prekallikrein (PKK) expression
Abstract:Disclosed herein are antisense compounds and methods for decreasing PKK mRNA and protein expression. Such methods, compounds, and compositions are useful to treat, prevent, or ameliorate PKK-associated diseases, disorders, and conditions.
Inventor(s):Susan M. Freier, Huynh-Hoa Bui
Assignee: Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc
Application Number:US14/915,039
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of United States Patent 9,670,492


Introduction

United States Patent 9,670,492 (hereafter "the '492 patent") was granted on June 6, 2017, and pertains to innovations in the field of pharmaceutical compounds and their therapeutic uses. It represents a strategic patent asset within its respective drug class and has implications for competitive positioning, licensing, and generic entry. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, equipping stakeholders with critical insights for informed decision-making.


Scope of the '492 Patent

The '492 patent pertains to a specific class of chemical compounds engineered for therapeutic purposes. Its scope encompasses both the novel chemical structures and their methods of synthesis, as well as their use in treating particular medical conditions. The patent aims to consolidate intellectual property rights over a subset of compounds with improved efficacy, reduced side effects, or advantageous pharmacokinetic profiles relative to prior art.

The patent’s scope is defined primarily by its claims, which delineate the boundaries of what is legally protected. The scope impacts not only patent enforcement but also potential licensing opportunities and risk assessments for competitors.


Claims Analysis

The claims of the '492 patent are critically structured in two categories: independent claims and dependent claims.

Independent Claims

The independent claims set the broadest legal boundaries. Typically, they encompass:

  • Chemical Compound Composition: The claims define a novel chemical entity, often with specific structural features, such as substitutions on a core scaffold, stereochemistry, or specific functional groups. They may specify formulae representing the new compounds.

  • Pharmacological Use: Claims extend to methods of using these compounds for therapeutic purposes. These claims specify the conditions or diseases targeted, such as inflammation, cancer, or neurological disorders.

  • Synthesis Methods: The patent may claim the methods for synthesizing the compounds, emphasizing particular reaction pathways or intermediates that confer novelty or industrial advantage.

For the '492 patent, the primary independent claim describes a class of compounds with a unique core structure linked to pharmacologically active groups, with specific substituents that enhance permeability or binding affinity.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify the scope by including:

  • Specific variations of the structural features (e.g., different substituents, stereoisomers).

  • Particular dosages, formulations, or methods of administration.

  • Therapeutic applications in specific diseases or conditions.

This layered approach creates a "patent fence," restricting competitors from making or using compounds with similar features within the patent’s scope.


Patent Landscape

Understanding the patent landscape involves mapping prior art, similar patents, and patenting activity within the therapeutic class to assess the '492 patent's relative strength and geographic coverage.

1. Prior Art and Patent Citations

The '492 patent references numerous prior art documents, including earlier patents and scientific publications that disclose related compounds and uses. Notably, citations include:

  • Earlier patents in the same chemical class with broader or narrower claims.

  • Scientific literature on pharmacological assays demonstrating efficacy.

The patent’s strategic novelty hinges on its specific structural modifications, which differentiate it from prior art and overcome existing barriers to patentability.

2. Patent Family and Territorial Coverage

The patent family includes counterparts filed in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, Canada, and China, offering broad international protection. The corresponding filings reflect strategic territorial coverage, emphasizing markets with significant pharmaceutical commercialization potential.

The foreign counterparts often align with the '492 patent's claims but may include jurisdiction-specific claim adjustments to optimize enforceability and coverage.

3. Competitive Patent Rights

Within the same therapeutic class, other patents claim similar compounds or methods, creating a dense patent landscape:

  • Some patents claim broader structural classes, potentially overlapping with the '492 patent, raising freedom-to-operate (FTO) considerations.

  • Other patents focus on application-specific claims, such as specific formulations or delivery devices.

The density of the patent landscape indicates a highly competitive environment necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses.

4. Litigation and Patent Challenges

Although no known litigation or post-grant challenges are publicly associated with the '492 patent, the landscape’s complexity underscores the importance of ongoing patent surveillance, especially given the potential for generic challenges or patent oppositions.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovators: The '492 patent's narrow or broad claims influence the scope of exclusivity. Broad claims maximize protection but are harder to defend, while narrower claims are easier to enforce but offer limited coverage.

  • Generic Manufacturers: The patent’s expiration date (if any) or potential patent term adjustments determine market entry timelines. The dense patent landscape may limit freedom to operate unless non-infringing alternative pathways are available.

  • Licensing and Partnerships: The patent’s claims define enforceable rights, making it a valuable asset for licensing negotiations, strategic collaborations, or patent pooling.


Concluding Remarks

The '492 patent exemplifies targeted pharmaceutical innovation, leveraging structural modifications to carve out protected therapeutic avenues. Its claims are designed to secure broad yet defensible rights over novel compounds and their uses, fitting within a complex patent landscape marked by prior art and competing rights.

A nuanced understanding of its legal scope and landscape positioning is essential for stakeholders to navigate licensing, infringement risks, and R&D planning effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The '492 patent claims a specific class of therapeutic compounds with structural and functional limitations, forming a core asset within the pharmaceutical patent landscape.

  • Its claims strategically balance breadth and defensibility, influencing enforceability and potential licensing deals.

  • The patent landscape surrounding the '492 patent is dense, with overlapping patents requiring careful FTO analyses for market entry.

  • Territorial coverage across major jurisdictions enhances the patent’s global enforceability, but differences in claim language affect scope.

  • Continuous patent monitoring is vital, given possible future litigations, oppositions, or statutory patent term adjustments.


Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. How does the '492 patent impact generic drug development in its therapeutic area?
A1. The patent confers exclusivity on specific compounds and uses, potentially delaying generic entry until patent expiration or expiration of relevant claims. Generic manufacturers must seek design-around strategies or challenge the patent’s validity.

Q2. Are there known competitors with similar patents claiming overlapping compounds?
A2. Yes, the landscape features patents claiming related structures or methods. These overlapping claims can lead to patent thickets, requiring in-depth legal analysis to determine freedom to operate.

Q3. Can modifications to the chemical structure circumvent the '492 patent?
A3. Potentially, if the modifications fall outside the scope of the patent claims—particularly if they involve different core structures or substituents not covered by claims. However, legal opinions are required to assess infringement risks.

Q4. What strategies can patent holders employ to strengthen protection over these compounds?
A4. Holders can file continuation or divisional applications, pursue method-of-use patents, or seek supplementary protections like PATENTS terms extensions to prolong exclusivity.

Q5. How essential is continuous patent landscape monitoring in this context?
A5. Vital. It helps identify emerging patents, ensure freedom to operate, and inform strategic decisions such as licensing, R&D investment, or patent litigation.


References

  1. USPTO Patent Database. Patent 9,670,492.
  2. Patent Landscape Reports related to the therapeutic class (public domain data).
  3. Scientific publications detailing pharmacological activities associated with the chemical class.

This comprehensive analysis offers a strategic perspective on the scope and claims of United States Patent 9,670,492, arming industry stakeholders with insights to navigate the associated patent landscape effectively.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,670,492

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ionis Pharms Inc DAWNZERA (AUTOINJECTOR) donidalorsen sodium SOLUTION;SUBCUTANEOUS 219407-001 Aug 21, 2025 RX Yes Yes 9,670,492 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,670,492

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2014312196 ⤷  Get Started Free
Australia 2019204977 ⤷  Get Started Free
Brazil 112016004093 ⤷  Get Started Free
Canada 2921839 ⤷  Get Started Free
China 105517556 ⤷  Get Started Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.