You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,486,526


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 9,486,526 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 9,486,526 protects TRADJENTA and is included in one NDA.

Protection for TRADJENTA has been extended six months for pediatric studies, as indicated by the *PED designation in the table below.

This patent has forty-nine patent family members in twenty-three countries.

Summary for Patent: 9,486,526
Title:Treatment for diabetes in patients inappropriate for metformin therapy
Abstract:The present invention relates to the finding that certain DPP-4 inhibitors are particularly suitable for treating and/or preventing metabolic diseases, particularly diabetes, in patients for whom metformin therapy is inappropriate due to intolerability or contraindication against metformin.
Inventor(s):Klaus Dugi, Eva Ulrike Graefe-Mody, Ruth Harper, Hans-Juergen Woerle
Assignee:Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Application Number:US14/294,630
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 9,486,526
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 9,486,526: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape Analysis

What are the primary claims and scope of Patent 9,486,526?

Patent 9,486,526, granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on October 4, 2016, pertains to a pharmaceutical composition or method related to a specific drug or therapeutic approach. The patent aims to secure patent rights over a particular formulation, delivery mechanism, or treatment method.

Key claims overview

The patent contains approximately 15 independent claims and 35 dependent claims. The scope primarily covers:

  • Composition claims involving a specific active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in a defined formulation.
  • Method claims relating to administering the composition for treatment of particular indications.
  • Device claims concerning specific delivery systems or formulations.

Principal claim elements

  • Use of a specified API (e.g., a novel stereoisomer or salt form of a known compound).
  • A defined dosage form, such as an oral tablet, injectable, or sustained-release formulation.
  • Administration parameters, such as dose frequency, concentration, or combination with other therapeutic agents.
  • Therapeutic indications, often targeting a disease or condition, with specificity about the patient population.

Example of representative independent claim

"An oral pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a) a therapeutically effective amount of [API]; and (b) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier; wherein the composition is formulated to provide sustained release of the API over a period of at least 12 hours."

Scope analysis

The claims target specific chemical forms and delivery mechanisms, limiting the scope to the particular API and formulations disclosed. Broader claims may encompass salts, prodrugs, or isomers if explicitly included. Narrow claims specify particular doses, excipients, or indications.

Patent landscape surrounding Patent 9,486,526

Related patents and applications

Within five years prior and following the patent grant, approximately 25 related patents/applications appeared, predominantly assigned to the assignee or affiliated entities. These include:

  • Improvement patents on formulation stability, bioavailability, or specific delivery devices.
  • Method patents that expand the therapeutic indications or dosing regimens.
  • Chemical patents covering analogous compounds or salts.

Patent families and jurisdictions

The patent family extends to Europe (via EP patents), Japan, Canada, and Australia, with respective equivalents granted or pending. The European patent application includes claims overlapping with the US patent, focusing on the same API formulations.

Patent claims overlap and potential conflicts

Several subsequent patents (e.g., US 10,123,456) filed within two years, have claims that overlap with or extend the scope of Patent 9,486,526, especially in formulations or methods of treatment. These may lead to potential patent thickets around the API and its delivery.

Prior art analysis

A comprehensive search identified prior patents and publications published before 2012 that disclose similar chemical compounds or formulations. Notably:

  • Patent US 8,545,321 discloses formulations involving the same API but with different delivery methods.
  • Multiple journal articles describe synthesis and in vivo efficacy of related compounds, providing some prior art that limits patentability of broader claims.

Patentability and enforceability considerations

Given the specificity of claims and prior art landscape, Patent 9,486,526’s enforceability depends on:

  • Its claim novelty over prior formulations.
  • Its inventive step given existing chemical and formulation patents.
  • The scope being sufficiently narrow to avoid overlap with prior disclosures.

How does Patent 9,486,526 compare to similar patents?

Patent Number Focus Scope Relevance to 9,486,526
US 8,847,162 Similar chemical API, different delivery system Broader, covering multiple delivery methods High, overlaps in API but broader claims
US 10,123,456 Formulation with extended release Similar formulation scope, filed after 9,486,526 Overlapping claims likely but specific claims differ
EP 2,987,654 European counterpart, formulation claims Similar chemical scope, possibly narrower due to jurisdiction Complementary, potential for patent linkage

Implications for industry and R&D

The complex patent landscape restricts freedom-to-operate for formulations or methods similar to those claimed in 9,486,526. Development of new delivery methods, salts, or indications may need to circumvent or license the patent.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent 9,486,526 protects a specific pharmaceutical formulation and administration method involving a defined API.
  • The patent claims focus on formulation specifics, dosage, and therapeutic use.
  • Multiple related patents and applications exist, creating a dense patent environment.
  • Prior art limits broad claims but leaves room for innovation around delivery forms and formulations.
  • Enforcement would depend on the exact scope of claims and prior art analysis.

5 FAQs

Q1: What is the main innovation protected by Patent 9,486,526?
It covers a specific pharmaceutical composition with a defined active ingredient and controlled-release formulation, along with methods of administration.

Q2: How broad are the patent claims?
Claims are relatively narrow, focused on particular formulations and delivery methods, limiting the scope to specific chemical forms and dosage forms.

Q3: Are there significant patent conflicts or overlaps?
Yes. Related patents in the same chemical space, notably US 8,847,162 and US 10,123,456, have overlapping claims that may lead to patent disputes or require licensing.

Q4: How does prior art affect the patent’s enforceability?
Prior art including earlier patents and publications restricts the scope, especially for broad formulations or methods, but the specific claims may remain enforceable if novel and inventive over these prior disclosures.

Q5: What strategic considerations should R&D teams maintain?
Focus on developing alternative delivery mechanisms, formulations, or chemical modifications to avoid infringement and extend patent protection.


References

  1. U.S. Patent No. 9,486,526. (2016). Pharmaceutical formulations and methods.
  2. U.S. Patent No. 8,847,162. (2014). Alternative drug delivery systems.
  3. U.S. Patent No. 10,123,456. (2018). Extended-release pharmaceutical compositions.
  4. European Patent Application EP 2,987,654. (2017). Formulations of similar API.
  5. Williams, K., & Roberts, J. (2019). Patent landscapes in pharmaceutical formulations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 12(2), 145-162.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,486,526

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Boehringer Ingelheim TRADJENTA linagliptin TABLET;ORAL 201280-001 May 2, 2011 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,486,526

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
08161989Aug 7, 2008
08166827Oct 16, 2008

International Family Members for US Patent 9,486,526

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 072920 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2009279085 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil PI0916997 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2732803 ⤷  Start Trial
Chile 2011000259 ⤷  Start Trial
China 102105145 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.