Details for Patent: 9,447,415
Summary for Patent: 9,447,415
| Title: | Antisense oligonucleotides for inducing exon skipping and methods of use thereof | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract: | An antisense molecule capable of binding to a selected target site to induce exon skipping in the dystrophin gene, as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 to 202. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventor(s): | Stephen Donald Wilton, Sue Fletcher, Graham McClorey | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assignee: | University of Western Australia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Application Number: | US14/857,561 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patent Claim Types: see list of patent claims | Composition; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Patent landscape, scope, and claims: | United States Patent 9,447,415 is a composition patent directed to morpholino antisense oligonucleotides that induce skipping of exon 45 in human dystrophin pre-mRNA. Its core scope covers 20- to 31-base antisense molecules with at least 20 consecutive bases complementary to a defined exon 45 sequence, plus pharmaceutical compositions containing those molecules. The patent is commercially relevant to casimersen, marketed as Amondys 45, and is listed in the FDA Orange Book for the product. The nominal patent term extends into 2031, subject to any patent-term adjustment, terminal disclaimer, or other recorded modification. United States Patent 9,447,415: Claim Scope, Exon 45 Antisense Coverage, and Casimersen Patent LandscapeWhat does United States Patent 9,447,415 protect?US 9,447,415 protects a morpholino antisense oligonucleotide designed to bind exon 45 of human dystrophin pre-mRNA and cause exon 45 skipping. The independent claims contain five material limitations:
Claim 2 extends the protection to a pharmaceutical composition containing the claimed morpholino and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The claims are product claims rather than claims limited to a particular administration route, dose, treatment schedule, patient genotype, or clinical endpoint. What sequence does the patent cover?The claim identifies the following 26-base exon 45 sequence:
The claim states that uracil bases are treated as thymine bases. In DNA-style notation, the sequence is:
The claimed antisense molecule must be 100% complementary to consecutive exon 45 bases and must contain at least 20 consecutive bases from the specified sequence region, subject to the claim's orientation and sequence construction. The principal covered sequence space is therefore a family of overlapping 20- to 31-base morpholino oligomers. A 20-base oligomer can fall within the claim if it is fully complementary to a qualifying consecutive segment. Longer oligomers can qualify if they contain at least 20 consecutive bases from the specified target region and remain 100% complementary to consecutive exon 45 bases. Claim construction pointsThe most important claim-construction issues are:
The written claim language favors a broad overlapping-oligomer interpretation, but the patent specification and prosecution history would control any litigation dispute over orientation, flanking bases, and the meaning of the functional limitation. How broad is claim 1 of US 9,447,415?Claim 1 is narrow by therapeutic target but broad within the defined exon 45 sequence window. It does not claim every exon 45-skipping antisense oligonucleotide. It requires all of the following:
The claim does not expressly require:
That structure gives the patent meaningful blocking potential against closely related morpholino sequences targeting the same exon 45 region. It does not necessarily block exon 45-skipping compounds using a different target window, a different antisense chemistry, or a sequence with less than 20 qualifying consecutive bases. What does claim 2 add to the patent protection?Claim 2 covers a pharmaceutical composition containing:
The carrier limitation is conventional and does not materially narrow the commercial product category. A finished injectable drug product containing a covered morpholino and standard pharmaceutical excipients would generally fall within the conceptual scope of claim 2. Claim 2 can be important in an infringement case because a marketed drug is ordinarily sold as a pharmaceutical composition rather than as an isolated oligonucleotide. It also provides a formulation-level claim even though it does not recite a detailed buffer, pH range, concentration, container, or administration device. What drug is associated with US 9,447,415?The patent is associated with casimersen, marketed in the United States as Amondys 45 by Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Casimersen is an antisense oligonucleotide for patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy whose dystrophin gene mutations are amenable to exon 45 skipping. The FDA approved Amondys 45 in February 2021 under the accelerated approval pathway based on an increase in dystrophin production in skeletal muscle. The approval requires confirmatory clinical evidence of clinical benefit. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2021a)
The product association does not mean that US 9,447,415 is the only patent relevant to casimersen. Commercial protection typically includes composition, formulation, manufacturing, use, and regulatory exclusivity rights. What is the Orange Book status of US 9,447,415?US 9,447,415 is listed in the FDA Orange Book for Amondys 45. The listing identifies the patent as a product-related patent for the approved casimersen product. The Orange Book listing places the patent in the standard Hatch-Waxman framework for a potential abbreviated new drug application. The patent has a nominal expiration date in January 2031 based on the underlying patent term. The operative date should be confirmed against the current FDA Orange Book entry and the USPTO patent record because patent-term adjustment, terminal disclaimers, or regulatory extensions can affect the enforceable date. The FDA Orange Book does not itself determine infringement or validity. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2025; United States Patent and Trademark Office, 2016) Hatch-Waxman significanceA generic applicant seeking approval of a casimersen product would need to address the listed patent through one of the statutory certification pathways. A Paragraph IV certification would assert that the patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed. If the innovator sued within the statutory period after receiving a Paragraph IV notice, FDA approval could be subject to a 30-month stay, subject to the statutory exceptions and litigation outcome. When does casimersen lose patent and regulatory exclusivity?
Orphan-drug exclusivity and patent protection operate independently. A generic or competing product can face different barriers depending on whether it is the same drug, uses a different application pathway, or challenges the patent before the orphan period ends. The accelerated approval status also creates a regulatory risk distinct from patent risk. Failure to verify clinical benefit can lead to additional FDA action, including labeling restrictions, withdrawal proceedings, or other regulatory measures. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2021a) Are there Paragraph IV challenges to US 9,447,415?No widely reported public Paragraph IV litigation against US 9,447,415 for casimersen has been identified in the principal public records through the available reporting period. The absence of public litigation does not establish that no certification has been submitted. ANDA certifications and notice letters can precede public court filings, and confidential commercial disputes may not appear in published litigation databases. The commercial incentive for a Paragraph IV challenge is limited before the end of orphan-drug exclusivity unless an applicant can establish a viable approval strategy. The patent remains the more important long-term barrier after orphan exclusivity expires. What other patents may cover casimersen and exon 45 skipping?The casimersen patent estate should be analyzed as a family rather than by relying on US 9,447,415 alone. Composition patentsComposition patents can cover:
US 9,447,415 is strongest against morpholino compounds that preserve the claimed exon 45 target segment and length range. Formulation patentsFormulation claims may cover:
The claims supplied for US 9,447,415 do not recite these formulation details. A separate formulation patent would therefore be required to create meaningful protection around a particular commercial presentation. Method-of-use patentsPotential use claims may address:
The supplied claims are not limited to treatment of a named disease. Their functional requirement is exon 45 skipping, not a clinical treatment outcome. Manufacturing and process patentsManufacturing protection may cover:
These patents can delay or increase the cost of generic entry even when a challenger avoids the composition claims. How strong is the patent estate for casimersen?The estate has relatively strong product-specific protection but limited breadth outside the claimed chemistry and sequence architecture.
A challenger could pursue a non-infringement position based on a different target sequence, a length outside the claimed range, non-morpholino chemistry, or failure to satisfy the 20-base sequence limitation. Validity challenges could focus on anticipation, obviousness, written description, enablement, claim construction, or the support for the exon-skipping functional limitation. Which companies compete with casimersen?Casimersen competes primarily within the exon-skipping DMD market rather than against another approved exon 45-skipping product.
Alternative technologies, including micro-dystrophin gene therapy and antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates, may avoid direct infringement of US 9,447,415 while competing for the same patients and treatment budgets. What generic entry risks exist?The principal generic-entry scenarios are:
The strongest design-around opportunity is a compound that preserves exon 45 skipping but uses a different target region or a chemistry outside the morpholino limitation. That strategy would still face separate patent families, regulatory comparability issues, manufacturing complexity, and potential method-of-use or formulation claims. What licensing and ownership issues affect the patent?The relevant commercial rights should be traced through the patent assignment chain, not only the original application applicant. Sarepta is the commercial sponsor of Amondys 45 and the associated exon-skipping platform. The patent record should be reviewed for assignments, mergers, security interests, exclusive licenses, and continuation applications. No public settlement agreement specific to a Paragraph IV challenge against US 9,447,415 is identified in the principal public sources. No publicly reported license has been identified that would eliminate the need to assess Sarepta's direct or controlled rights in the patent family. Key Takeaways
FAQs About US 9,447,415 and Casimersen Patent ProtectionDoes US 9,447,415 cover all exon 45-skipping drugs?No. It is limited principally by the morpholino chemistry, the 20- to 31-base length range, the specified exon 45 sequence region, and the exon-skipping functional requirement. Does the patent cover eteplirsen or golodirsen?No. Eteplirsen targets exon 51 and golodirsen targets exon 53. They do not satisfy the exon 45 target limitation in the stated claims. Can a non-morpholino exon 45 antisense drug avoid this patent?Potentially. The express morpholino limitation creates a possible non-infringement route for a different antisense chemistry, although other patents may apply. Is Amondys 45 protected by orphan-drug exclusivity as well as patents?Yes. FDA orphan-drug exclusivity and patent protection are separate rights with different legal standards and expiration calculations. Does the Orange Book listing prove that the patent is valid?No. An Orange Book listing identifies patent information submitted for an approved drug. It does not establish patent validity, enforceability, or infringement. References
More… ↓ |
Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,447,415
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Patented / Exclusive Use | Submissiondate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Patented / Exclusive Use | >Submissiondate |
Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,447,415
| Foriegn Application Priority Data | ||
| Foreign Country | Foreign Patent Number | Foreign Patent Date |
| Australia | 2004903474 | Jun 28, 2004 |
International Family Members for US Patent 9,447,415
| Country | Patent Number | Estimated Expiration | Supplementary Protection Certificate | SPC Country | SPC Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | E498685 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Cyprus | 1111447 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| Cyprus | 1117475 | ⤷ Start Trial | |||
| >Country | >Patent Number | >Estimated Expiration | >Supplementary Protection Certificate | >SPC Country | >SPC Expiration |
