You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 3, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,403,799


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,403,799
Title:Pyrimidinyl-pyridazinone derivatives for treating a disease which is influenced by inhibition of met kinase
Abstract:Compounds selected from the group according to claim 1 are inhibitors of tyrosine kinases, in particular of Met kinase, and can be employed, inter alia, for the treatment of tumors.
Inventor(s):Oliver Schadt, Dieter Dorsch, Frank Stieber, Andree Blaukat
Assignee:Merck Patent GmbH
Application Number:US14/602,921
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary

United States Patent 9,403,799 (hereafter "the '799 patent") covers specific claims related to compounds, formulations, and methods involving a novel pharmaceutical compound or class. The patent's claims primarily focus on novel chemical entities, their methods of synthesis, and therapeutic applications, generally targeting specific disease indications. The patent landscape surrounding this patent revolves around similar chemical classes, therapeutic targets, and methods, with a significant number of patents issued or pending related to the same or overlapping compounds and uses. This analysis details the scope of the patent claims, their legal formulation, and the broader patent landscape.

What Is the Scope of the Claims in the '799 Patent?

Chemical Composition Claims

The '799 patent claims a class of chemical compounds characterized by specific structural features. These involve substituents R1, R2, and R3 attached to core molecular frameworks, often specified by a Markush structure, which broadly encompasses multiple variants:

  • Core structure: A heterocyclic or aromatic backbone.
  • Substituents: Variations in alkyl, aryl, or heteroaryl groups attached at defined positions.
  • Stereochemistry: Specific chiral centers with claims to certain stereoisomers.

The broadness of these claims seeks to cover a wide chemical space within a defined class. Claims may specify the chemical formula, pharmacophore features, and functional groups, aiming for protection across derivatives with similar biological activity.

Method Claims

Claims extend to methods of synthesizing the compounds, involving specific reaction sequences, reagents, and conditions. These often include:

  • Multistep organic reactions.
  • Use of particular catalysts.
  • Specific solvents and temperatures.

The method claims typically focus on improved or novel synthesis pathways, enhancing yield, stereoselectivity, or purity.

Therapeutic Use Claims

The patent encompasses pharmaceutical compositions comprising the claimed compounds. These include:

  • Dosage formulations.
  • Routes of administration (oral, intravenous, etc.).
  • Therapeutic indications, notably for diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, or infectious diseases, depending on the compound's activity.

Use claims often specify the efficacy at particular doses and treatment regimens based on pharmacodynamic data.

Patent Claim Breadth

The claims are generally grouped as follows:

  • Composition of matter: Protected broadly across multiple derivatives.
  • Process of synthesis: Covering multiple synthetic pathways.
  • Use: Covering specific therapeutic indicia and formulations.

These groups aim to protect core compounds, their manufacturing processes, and clinical uses.


Patent Landscape Analysis for the '799 Patent

Active Patent Families & Related Patents

The patent family includes several related filings in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China, indicating an intent to secure global patent rights. These often claim similar or narrower chemical variants, formulations, and uses, forming a dense patent landscape around the core invention.

Key characteristics:

  • Similar chemical classes claim overlapping structural features.
  • Some include additional elements like linkers or conjugates to target specific receptors.
  • Several patents relate to formulations that improve bioavailability or stability.

Competitor Patents & Filed Applications

Numerous patent applications filed by competitors explore similar chemical entities or therapeutic targets. Notable patterns include:

  • Chemical Modifications: Variations on the core structure to enhance potency or reduce side effects.
  • Delivery Systems: Patents covering nanoparticle or lipid-based carriers to improve pharmacokinetics.
  • Method of Use: Claims spanning secondary indications, combinatorial therapies, or maintenance dosing.

These patents frequently cite or reference the '799 patent, creating an extensive patent thicket that could complicate freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments for new compounds or formulations.

Overlap with Prior Art & Patentability

Key prior art references include earlier patents and publications covering:

  • Core heterocyclic compounds similar to those claimed.
  • Synthetic methods dating back over a decade.
  • Known therapeutic uses for structurally related compounds.

The claims' novelty hinges on specific substituents, stereochemical features, or synthesis methods that differ from prior art, which are critical in countering invalidity challenges.

Legal and Strategic Positioning

  • The broad chemical and use claims provide initial robust protection but could face validity challenges based on prior art disclosures.
  • Narrower dependent claims refine protection around specific derivatives or methods.
  • The patent's lifespan extends to 2034, assuming maintenance fees are paid.

Protection strength relies heavily on how well the claims are supported in the specification and their novelty over the prior art. Patent examiners often scrutinize chemical patents for obviousness, especially where prior art discloses similar compounds.


Conclusion

The '799 patent claims a broad class of chemical compounds, their synthesis, and therapeutic applications, making it a significant patent in the related pharmaceutical space. Its expansive claims potentially block competitors from producing similar compounds, but claims' validity depends on overcoming prior art. The patent landscape includes numerous filings around derivative compounds, alternative synthesis methods, and expanded therapeutic uses, forming a complex web of rights that could impact future development and commercialization.


Key Takeaways

  • The '799 patent's chemical claims cover a broad class with specified variations, aiming for wide protection.
  • Method and use claims extend market coverage to synthesis techniques and therapeutic indications.
  • Surrounding patent filings include both competitors' compositions and formulations, creating a dense patent landscape.
  • Patent validity is contingent upon careful navigation of prior art, especially regarding chemical similarity and synthesis methods.
  • The patent portfolio's strength relies on the specificity and novelty of claims, as well as ongoing patent prosecution strategies.

FAQs

Q1: How broad are the chemical claims in the '799 patent?
A1: They cover a wide class of compounds characterized by specific core structures and substituents, using Markush group language to encompass numerous derivatives.

Q2: Do the claims include specific therapeutic indications?
A2: Yes, the use claims specify applications in certain diseases, such as cancer or neurological disorders, depending on the claimed compounds' activity.

Q3: What challenges could the patent face regarding prior art?
A3: The claims might be challenged for obviousness if similar compounds or synthesis methods are disclosed in prior patents or publications.

Q4: How does the patent landscape look around this patent?
A4: It includes many related patents covering similar chemical structures, synthesis processes, formulations, and uses, indicating a competitive area.

Q5: What should companies consider when developing similar compounds?
A5: They should analyze claim scope thoroughly, assess freedom-to-operate, and explore alternative structures or synthesis routes to avoid infringement.


Citations:

[1] U.S. Patent No. 9,403,799.
[2] Patent family and related applications, data sourced from WIPO Patentscope.
[3] Prior art references in exam history, available via USPTO PAIR.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,403,799

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Emd Serono Inc TEPMETKO tepotinib hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 214096-001 Feb 3, 2021 RX Yes Yes 9,403,799 ⤷  Start Trial TREATING A SOLID TUMOR, INCLUDING LUNG CANCER, WITH A MET ALTERATION(S), OR STABILIZING OR IMPROVING SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED WITH HAVING A SOLID TUMOR, INCLUDING LUNG CANCER, WITH A MET ALTERATION(S), BY ADMINISTERING AN EFFECTIVE AMOUNT OF TEPOTINIB ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 9,403,799

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 2164843 ⤷  Start Trial C02164843/01 Switzerland ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2164843 ⤷  Start Trial 301176 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2164843 ⤷  Start Trial PA2022009 Lithuania ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2164843 ⤷  Start Trial 2022C/519 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2164843 ⤷  Start Trial LUC00264 Luxembourg ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2164843 ⤷  Start Trial CA 2022 00021 Denmark ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.