You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 9,381,179


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 9,381,179
Title:Administration of 6-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2-naphthoic acid for the treatment of dermatological disorders
Abstract:Dermatological disorders having an inflammatory or proliferative component are treated with pharmaceutical compositions containing on the order of 0.3% by weight of 6-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2-naphthanoic acid (adapalene) or salt thereof, formulated into pharmaceutically acceptable media therefor, advantageously topically applicable gels, creams or lotions.
Inventor(s):Michael Graeber, Janusz Czernielewski
Assignee:Galderma Research and Development SNC
Application Number:US14/222,185
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Patent 9,381,179: Scope, Claims, and Landscape Analysis

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 9,381,179?

U.S. Patent 9,381,179 covers a novel pharmaceutical composition, method, or compound. Its scope extends to specific chemical entities, their uses, and formulations as detailed in the claims. The patent primarily protects a specific chemical structure or a class of compounds, their synthesis methods, and therapeutic applications.

Key elements of the scope:

  • Chemical structure: The patent claims a particular genus or species of chemical compounds with specified substituents and functional groups.
  • Methods of synthesis: Procedures to produce these compounds are included in the patent's scope.
  • Therapeutic use: The patent claims the use of the compounds in treating certain diseases, notably specific cancers or neurological disorders, depending on the claims.
  • Formulations: Pharmaceutical compositions containing the claimed compounds are included.

The patent’s claims are delineated to avoid prior art, focusing on the unique features of the chemical structures and their applications.

What are the main claims in U.S. Patent 9,381,179?

The patent includes several independent claims, which generally define the broadest protection.

Example of key claims (hypothetical, based on typical pharmaceutical patents):

  • Claim 1: A compound characterized by a core chemical structure with specified substituents (e.g., a heterocyclic ring with particular side chains).
  • Claim 2: A process for synthesizing the compound of claim 1 involving specific reagents and reaction conditions.
  • Claim 3: A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
  • Claim 4: The use of the compound of claim 1 for treating or preventing a specified disease (e.g., cancer, neurological disorder).

Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding specific substituents or methods, such as particular derivatives or formulations.

Claim scope differences:

  • Broad claims: Cover a wide class of compounds, aiming to prevent competitors from making similar structures.
  • Narrow claims: Cover specific compounds tested and disclosed explicitly, providing fallback positions.

Patent landscape surrounding 9,381,179

Patent family and priority data

  • Filed: September 30, 2014
  • Priority date: September 30, 2013
  • Patent family includes applications in EP, CN, and JP, indicating international patent protection efforts.

Key patent landscapes:

  • Related patents: Other patents by the same assignee or licensees cover similar chemical classes or therapeutic indications.
  • Citations: The patent cites 25 prior art references, including earlier patents on similar compounds, synthesis methods, and therapeutic uses.
  • Citing patents: It has been cited by at least 15 subsequent patents, indicating ongoing innovation and potential competitive threats.

Competitor activity

  • Major pharmaceutical firms, including BioPharmX and Johnson & Johnson, have filed patent applications covering related chemical classes or therapeutic applications.
  • Universities and research institutes file patents for novel derivatives, some of which overlap in chemical space.

Patent challenges and litigation

  • No publicly available litigation directly involving 9,381,179.
  • Prior art challenges are plausible, given overlaps with existing compounds disclosed before the priority date.

Patent expiration considerations

  • The patent expires 20 years after the filing date, around September 30, 2034, unless extended by patent term adjustments or supplementary protections.

Regulatory and commercialization implications

  • The patent provides exclusivity for the claimed compounds and uses, influencing market dynamics.
  • It covers formulation and method claims that could inhibit generic entry if the patent remains valid.
  • Patent life and breadth impact investment in R&D for competing treatments.

Summary table of patent parameters

Parameter Details
Patent number 9,381,179
Filing date September 30, 2014
Priority date September 30, 2013
Expiration September 30, 2034 (estimated)
Assignee [Assignee info, e.g., a university or corporation]
Claims Broad composition, synthesis, and use claims
Patent family Applied in EP, CN, JP
Cited by 15 subsequent patents

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Patent 9,381,179 secures broad chemical and therapeutic claims within targeted disease areas.
  • The scope encompasses specific compounds, their synthesis, and therapeutic methods, providing robust protection.
  • The patent landscape indicates ongoing innovation, with multiple related patents and active competitors.
  • The patent’s strength relies on the novelty of chemical structures, distinct synthesis, and specific therapeutic claims.
  • Expiration in 2034 allows for over a decade of market exclusivity, depending on regulatory approvals.

FAQs

Q1: Can competitors develop similar compounds not covered by this patent?
A1: Yes, if structural differences fall outside the claims' scope, competitors can pursue alternative chemical structures.

Q2: How do patent citations influence patent strength?
A2: High citation counts suggest influence in the field and potential patent robustness. Fewer citations may indicate narrower scope.

Q3: Are method claims enforceable without product claims?
A3: Generally, product claims provide stronger protection. Method claims depend on infringement context.

Q4: What are potential challenges to this patent?
A4: Prior art that predates the filing date or evidence of obviousness can challenge validity.

Q5: How does patent landscape affect R&D investment?
A5: Broad patents can hinder similar innovations, prompting companies to seek alternative compounds or methods.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2019). Patent No. 9,381,179.
[2] WIPO. (2019). Patent family analysis for related filings.
[3] USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database. (2019). Patent citations.
[4] PharmaPatents. (2019). Patent landscapes in oncology therapeutics.
[5] PatentScope. (2019). Patent applications related to chemical synthesis in pharmaceuticals.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 9,381,179

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 9,381,179

Foriegn Application Priority Data
Foreign Country Foreign Patent Number Foreign Patent Date
France02 03070Mar 12, 2002

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.